期刊文献+

Strategic Management Development From the State-Owned Company to the Private Company

Strategic Management Development From the State-Owned Company to the Private Company
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The privatization of a firm entails a thoroughgoing process of reform that includes the introduction of new management practices. A review of the theoretical and empirical studies conducted allows us to confirm that a systematic analysis of the contextual, organizational and strategic factors that arise after a public company's privatization does not exist. This study explores the changes in strategic management that take place after a public company's privatization and proposes a theoretical global analysis model that facilitates their analysis. In order to confirm the theoretical propositions posed, the contemporary multiple case study was used as a research methodology. In particular, the changes experienced in the strategic management area in four privatized Spanish companies were investigated along the lines of a longitudinal analysis. The results of this study show that most theoretical propositions are confirmed or tend to be, according to the evidence shown by the firms in the sample. In addition, a comparative analysis of the different firms' behaviors by following the structure constructed on the basis of the three areas (strategies, objectives and organizational structure) leads to the conclusion that all these areas are relevant to the process of change in a privatized firm's strategic management.
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2011年第1期48-58,共11页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 strategies objectives organizational structure effects of privatization case study 民营企业 国有企业 理发 组织结构 上市公司 私有化 全局分析 管理
  • 相关文献

参考文献63

  • 1Aharoni, Y. (1981). Managerial discretion in state oxvned enterprises. In R. Vernon, & Y. Aharoni (Eds.), State-owned enterprise in western economies (pp. 184-193). Londres: Croom Helm.
  • 2Argimdn, I., Artola, C., & Gonzfilez-P/tramo, J. M. (1997). Public company and private company: Ownership and relative efficiency. (Bank of Spain, studies service (literal translation) Work document No. 9723).
  • 3Atkinson, S. E., & Halvorsen, R. (1986). The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a regulated environment: The case of US electric utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 281-294.
  • 4Bell, J., Mcnaughton, R., & Young, S. (2001). Born-again global firms: An extension of the "born-global" phenomenon. Journal of International Management, 7, 173-189.
  • 5Bishop, M., & Thompson. D. (1992). Privatisation in the U.K.: Internal organisation and productive efficiency. Annals oJ Public and Cooperative Economics, 63(2), 171 - 188.
  • 6Boardman, A. E., Laurin. C., & Vining, A. R. (2003). Privatization in North America. In D. Parker, & D. Saal (Eds.), International handbook on privatization (pp. 129-160). Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
  • 7Boubakri, N., & Cosset, J. C. (1998). The financial and operating performance of newly privatised firms: Evidence from developing countries. ,lournal of Finance, 53(3). 1081-1110.
  • 8Boubakri. N., & Hamza, O. (2007). The dynamics of privatization, the legal environment and stock market development. International Review of Financial Analysis, 16(4), 304-331.
  • 9Boubakri. N., Cosset. J. C.. & Guedhami, O. (2005). Liberalization, corporate governance and the performance ofprivatized firms in developina countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 767-790.
  • 10Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1996). A theory of privatisation. Economic Journal, 106, 309-319.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部