期刊文献+

农民主观生活质量问卷的编制研究 被引量:6

Development and initial validation of subjective quality of life of farmers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制农民主观生活质量问卷,为评价农民生活质量提供测评工具。方法通过政策和文献学习、咨询专家、借鉴以往问卷、质化访谈和开放式问卷等建立项目库,两次选取云南与河南536和332名农民为样本,进行项目分析、因子分析和信效度分析。结果(1)该问卷的项目特性良好,项目与总分的相关均达到显著,相关系数均在0.3以上;(2)探索性因子分析各因子因子载荷为0.425~0.912,特征根均大于1,3个分问卷累计解释总变异量为51.603%,50.130%和55.676%;验证性因子分析拟合度较高;(3)问卷信度α系数为0.5989~0.9241,分半信度为0.5897~0.8936;效标效度0.125~0.640。结论问卷具有较好的信效度,可以作为测量农民生活质量的工具。 Objective To development a subjective quality of life of farmers and provide the evaluation of measurement tools of the the quality of life. Methods Established items library by policy learning, literature review, consulting experts, learn questionnaires, questionnaire surveying and interview, then about 536 farms and 332 farms are picked out randomly as samples from Yunan and Henan provide, Item analysis ,factor analysis and analysis of reliability and validity are executed. Results ( 1 ) Item analysis showed this questionnaire had satisfactory item discrimination,the correlations between items and total scores were significant,the correlation coefficient of items above 0.3. (2) Exploratory showed analysis find the factor loading range from 0. 425 to 0. 912 . Eigenvalue greater than 1, three sub-questionnaires cumulative total explained variance was 51. 603%, 50. 130% and 55.676%. Confirmatory factor analysis had a higher goodness of fit. (3) Cronbaeha' α coefficient range from 0. 5989 to 0. 9241, split-half reliability range from 0. 5897 to 0. 8936 and criterion validity range from 0. 125 to 0. 640. Conclusion The questionnaire has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a measurement tool for measuring the quality of life of farmers.
作者 班永飞 李辉
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期280-282,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家社会科学基金西部项目(08XZX011)
关键词 主观生活质量 信度 效度 探索性分析 The subjective quality of life Reliability Validity Exploratory factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment: development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med, 1998,46 : 1569- 1585.
  • 2Brenda L,Guus L,Jan A, et al. The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol,2009, 62 : 195-205.
  • 3Gulbeyaz C, Zehra D, Adnan A. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Life Index [ QLI] ( Cancer version). Eur J One Nut,2010,14: 316-321.
  • 4Ferrans E,Powers M. Quality of Life Index: development and psychometric. Adv Nut Sci, 1985,8 : 15-24.
  • 5Smith GC, Trauer T, KeRR PG, et al. Prospective quality-of-life monito- ring of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipients using the 36-Item short-form health survey. Am J Kidney Dis,2010,55:698- 707.
  • 6Hornaer-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, et al. Differential performance of SF-36 item in heahh-y adults with and without functional limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2010,9:570-575.
  • 7吴汉荣,刘普林,蒙衡.儿少生活质量量表信效度分析及全国常模的制定[J].中国学校卫生,2006,27(1):18-21. 被引量:95
  • 8耿瑞月,解亚宁,赵静波,房芳,张馨予,郝洪键.广东省武警官兵生活质量影响因素的研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(9):818-820. 被引量:11
  • 9杨海丽,王鹏,陈国鹏.大学生职业价值观量表的初步编制[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2010,19(12):1133-1135. 被引量:3
  • 10Gotay C, Blaine D. Haynes. Assessment of quality of life in a multicultural cancer patient population psychological assessment. J Abnorm Psychol,2002 ,14 :439-450.

二级参考文献27

共引文献106

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部