期刊文献+

多段翼型的一种增升控制方法

A Lift-enhancing Mothed on Multielement Airfoil
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何在提高增升装置性能的同时降低机构的重量和复杂程度有着重要的意义。采用CFD手段对一种在多段翼型主翼后缘凹陷处加薄片(cover tab)的主动控制方法进行了数值研究。以Gaw—1两段翼型为基准翼型,对不同参数组合的tab构型进行了计算。最佳构型是在主翼后缘凹陷处距离后缘1%主翼弦长处增加高度为0.5%主翼弦长的tab,增加最大升力系数4.88%。结合计算结果对这种主动控制技术方法的参数对流动的影响以及改善流动的机理等做了探讨。计算结果表明,该方法可以改善后缘襟翼上翼面的流动,推迟流动的分离,从而增加多段翼型的最大升力系数。 The method of computational fluid dynamics(CFD) was used to calculate a lift-enhancing mothed on multielement airfoil,which contain a tab placed in the main-element trailing edge cover.A series of models with different parameters were calculated.The best configuration calculated,a 0.5%-chord tab placed 1% chord of the main-element trailing edge cover,increased the maximum lift coefficient of the airfoil by 4.88%.The mechanism of tab and the effect of the tab parameters were disscussed.The results show that this method can not only delay flow separation,but also increase the maximum lift coefficient.
作者 张鹏程 李栋
出处 《科学技术与工程》 2011年第7期1485-1489,共5页 Science Technology and Engineering
关键词 多段翼型 数值模拟 湍流模型 multielement airfoil numerical simulation turbulent model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Brunet V, Francois C, Gamier E, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of vortex generators effects. AIAA,2006-3027.
  • 2Patel M P, Sowle Z H, Corke T C, et al. Autonomous sensing and control of wing stall using a smart plasma slat. AIAA ,2 006-1 207.
  • 3Rudolph P K C. High-lift systems on commerical subsonic airliners . NASA Contractor Report, 1996.
  • 4Ross J C, Storms B L, Carrannanto P G. Lift-enhancing tabs on mul- tielement airfoils. NASA TM-112914, 1993.
  • 5Wentz W H, Seetbaram Jr H C. Development of A fowler flap system for a hihg perfoemance general aviation airfoil . NASA Contractor Report, 1974.
  • 6朱自强,陈迎春,吴宗成,陈泽民.高升力系统外形的数值模拟计算[J].航空学报,2005,26(3):257-262. 被引量:48

二级参考文献34

  • 1Meredith P. Viscous phenomena affecting high-lift systems and suggestions for future CFD development[R]. AGARD CP 515,1993.19-1-19-2.
  • 2Smith A M O. High lift aerodynamics[J].J Aircraft,1975, 12(6):501-530.
  • 3Haines A B. Scale effects on aircraft and weapon aerodynamics[R]. AGARD Ograph 323, 1994.
  • 4van Dam C P, Los S M, Miley S, et al. In-flight boundary layer measurements on a high lift system[J]. J Aircraft, 1997,34(6):748-756.
  • 5van Dam CP, Los S M, Miley S, et al. In-flight boundary layer measurements on a high lift system: main element and flap[J]. J Aircaft,1997, 34(6):757-763.
  • 6Gaster M. On the flow along swept leading edges[J]. Aeronaut Q,1967,18:165-184.
  • 7Pfenninger W. Laminar flow control laminerization[R]. AGARD Report 654, 1977.3-1-3-75.
  • 8Poll D I A. Transition in the infinite swept attachment line boundary layer[J]. Aeronaut Q,1979, 30:607-629.
  • 9Hall P, Malik M R, Poll D I A. On the instability of an infinite swept attachment line boundary layer[A]. Proc R Soc London[C]. 1984.229-245.
  • 10Haines A B. Scale effects on CL max at high Reynolds number[A]. Proceedings of high lift and separation control[C]. University of Bath, UK, 1995.28.1-28.14.

共引文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部