期刊文献+

艾司西酞普兰治疗老年抑郁症的对照研究 被引量:3

A control study of Escitalopram in the treatment of elderly depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨艾司西酞普兰治疗老年抑郁症的疗效及安全性。方法:将56例老年抑郁症患者随机分为两组各28例,研究组口服艾司西酞普兰治疗,对照组口服文拉法辛治疗,观察6周。于治疗前及治疗12、4、6、周末采用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定临床疗效,副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果:治疗6w末,研究组总有效率92.85%,对照组为85.78%,两组总体疗效相当(χ2=0.187,P>0.05)。汉密顿抑郁量表评分,两组治疗1周末起,较治疗前有显著下降(P<0.05或0.01),研究组治疗1周末较对照组下降显著(P<0.05),其他时点评分均无显著性差异(P>0.05),两组不良反应均轻微。结论:艾司西酞普兰治疗老年抑郁症的疗效与文拉法辛相当,且起效较文拉法辛快,安全性高,依从性好。 Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of Escitalopram in the treatment of elderly patients with depression.Methods:56 patients were randomly divided into research group(n=28) took orally escitalopram and control group(n=28) did venlafaxine for 6 weeks.Efficacies were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) and adverse reactions with the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS) before treatment and at the ends of the 1st,2nd,4th,and 6th week.Results:After 6 week treatment,total effective rates were respectively 92.85% in the research and 85.78% in the control group,the total efficacies of both groups were equivalence(P 0.05).The HAMD scores lowered more significantly since the end of the 1st week in both groups(P 0.05 or 0.01),did more significantly in the research than in the control group at the end of the 1st week(P 0.05),and there were no significant differences at other time points(P 0.05).Adverse reactions of both groups were mild.Conclusion:Escitalopram has therapeutic equivalence to Venlafaxine,but takes effects quicker and has higher safety and better compliance in the treatment of elderly depression,and deserves to be extended and utilized clinically.
出处 《中国民康医学》 2011年第6期664-665,共2页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 老年抑郁症 艾司西酞普兰 Elderly depression Escitalopram
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1张红梅,梁炜,张红亚.艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰治疗广泛性焦虑障碍对照研究[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2009,28(5):364-367. 被引量:36
  • 2中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].第3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:75-77.
  • 3Colonna L, Anderson HF, Reines EH. A randomized, double blind, 24 - week study of escitalopram (10mg/d) versus citapram (20rag/d) in primary eare patients with major depressive disorder [ J ]. Curt Med Res Opin,2005,21 (10) : 1659 - 1668.
  • 4钱敏才,沈鑫华,林敏.艾司西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗门诊抑郁症的对照研究[J].上海精神医学,2007,19(2):95-97. 被引量:51
  • 5Baldwin DS, Cooper JA, Huuson AK, et al. A double - blind, randomized, parallel - group, flexible study to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy and effects of treatment discontinuation with escitalopram and paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder[ J ]. Int Clin Psychophamarcol, 2006,21 : 159 - 169.
  • 6Bielsk R J, Ventura D, Chang CC. A double - blind comparison of escitalopram and Venlafaxine extended release in the treatment of major depressive disorder [ J ]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2004,65 ( 9 ) : 1190 - 1996.

二级参考文献9

  • 1唐伟,黄文武.西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗抑郁症的对照研究[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(2):87-88. 被引量:12
  • 2BRKEU WJ. Escitalopram[J]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2002, 11(10): 1477-1486.
  • 3BIELSKI RJ, BOSE A, CHANG CC. A double-blind comparison of escitalopram and paroxetine in the long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder[J]. Ann Clin Psychiatry, 2005, 17 (2) : 65-69.
  • 4MURDOCH D, KEAM SJ. Eseitalopram: a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder[J]. Drugs, 2005, 65(16) : 2379-2404.
  • 5GORMAN JM, KOROTZER A, SU G. Efficacy comparison of escitalopram and citalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials [J]. CNS Spectr,2002, 7(4 Suppl 1): 40-44.
  • 6Colonna L,Andersen HF,Reines EH.A randomized,doubleblind,24 -week study of escitalopram(10mg/day) versus citalopram (20 m/day) in primary care patients with major depressive disorder.Curr Med Res Opin,2005,21(10):1659 -1668
  • 7Moore N,Verdoux H,Fantino B.Prospective,multicentre,randomized,double-blind study of the efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram in outpatient treatment of major depressive disorder.Int Clin Psychopharmcol,2005,20:131-137
  • 8马现仓,伏炜,陈策.西酞普兰与帕罗西汀治疗广泛性焦虑对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(5):325-326. 被引量:7
  • 9陈珺,宋敏,杭太俊,王丽,文爱东,杨林.艾司西酞普兰在健康人体的药动学[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2007,26(12):912-916. 被引量:9

共引文献573

同被引文献43

  • 1刘文,李焕德.新型抗抑郁药物的临床应用及其作用机制研究进展[J].中国药房,2007,18(1):66-68. 被引量:30
  • 2王家良.循证医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
  • 3汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,2001:161-167.
  • 4中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍诊断分类与标准[M].济南:山东科技出版社,2001:118-119.
  • 5van Ameringen M, Mancini C, Patterson B, et al. Pharmacotherapy for social anxiety disorder., an update [J]. IsrJ Psychiatry Relat Sci, 2009, 46 (1): 53-61.
  • 6Chen F, Larsen MB, Sdnchez C, et al. The S-enantiomer of R, S-citalopram, increases inhibitor binding to the human serotonin transporter by an allosteric mechanism. Comparison with other serotonin transporter inhibitors [J ]. Eur Neuropsyehopharmacol, 2005, 15 (2): 193-198.
  • 7Wellington K, Perry CM. Venlafaxine extended-release., a review of its use in the management of major depression [J]. CNSDruus, 2001, 15 (8): 643-669.
  • 8Wellington K, Perry CM. Venlafaxine extended-release: a review of its use in the management of major depression [J]. CNSDrugs, 2001, 15 (8): 643-669.
  • 9Mork A, Kreilgaard M, Sdnchez C. The R-enantiomer of citalopram counteracts escitalopram-induced increase in extracellular 5-HT in the frontal cortex of freely moving rats [J]. Neuropharmacology, 2003, 45 (2): 167-173.
  • 10Tonelli MR. The limits of evidence based medicine [J] Respir Care, 2001, :6 (12) : 143S-1440.

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部