期刊文献+

基于Agent的辩论谈判系统的协议研究 被引量:1

Research on protocol of argument-negotiation system based on Agent
下载PDF
导出
摘要 协议是谈判支持系统实现的基本条件之一。依据经典的BD(I信念、愿望、意图)理论和已有的协议,将人类辩论思想融入,给出了协议的基本语言和逻辑框架,提出了相应的状态转换图,对状态转换图中的推理规则进行了详细阐述,从而构建了更加完整的基于Agent的辩论谈判系统协议。最后结合已有的策略和模型,以系统实现的方式对协议的合理性和有效性进行了验证,并指出了下一步研究方向。 Protocol is one of the basic conditions to help negotiation support system to come true.According to the classic theory of BDI and current negotiation protocols based on Agent,the basic language and logic framework of this protocol are given after idea of argument of human being is imported,and relative figure of state transition is also given.Then inferential rules of this figure are described.Based on these,a more integrated protocol of argument-negotiation system based on Agent is constructed.Finally,the rationality and validity of this protocol are verified through the development of relative system combined with existing strategies and models,and future directions in this area are discussed.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期37-40,共4页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费资助(No.2009QG03)~~
关键词 AGENT 辩论 谈判 系统 协议 Agent argument negotiation system protocol
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Rahwan I, Ramchurn S D, Jennings N R, et al.Argumentationbased negotiation[J].The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2004, 18(4) :343-375.
  • 2孙华梅,李一军,曹荣增,黄梯云.基于约束放松的电子商务协同谈判模型[J].运筹与管理,2008,17(4):132-137. 被引量:3
  • 3Esteva M,Rodriguez J A,Sierra C,et al.On the formal specifications of electronic institutions[C]//Dignum F, Sierra C.Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce: The European AgentLink Perspective.Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 2001,1991 : 126-147.
  • 4Sierra C,Jennings N R,Noriega P,et al.A framework for argumentationbased negotiation[C]//Singh M, Rao A, Wooldridge M. Intelligent Agent IV.4th International Workshop on Agent Theoties.Berlin: SptingerVerlag, 1998,1365.: 177-192.
  • 5McBurney P, Parsons S, Van Eijk R, et al.A dialoguegame protocol for agent purchase negotiations[J].Journal of Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 2002,7(3) : 235-273.
  • 6Sadri F,Toni F,Torroni P.Dialogues for negotiation,Agent varieties and dialogue sequences[C]//Meyer J J, Tambe M.Intelligent Agent Series VIII.Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.Berlin: Springer, 2001,2333 : 69-84.
  • 7Sadri F, Toni F, Torroni ELogie agents, dialogues and negotiation:An abductive approach[C]//Stathis K, Schroeder M.Proceedings of the AISB 2001 Symposium on Information Agents for ECommerce.Berlin: Springer, 2001,2333 : 31-38.
  • 8Sadri F, Toni F, Torroni EAbductive logic programming architecture for negotiating agents[C]//Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence.Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 2002,2424: 419-431.
  • 9Ramchurn S D, Jennings N, Sierra C.Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach[C]//IJCAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments, 2003 : 9-17.
  • 10Kraus S, Sycara K, Evenchik A.Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation[J].Jouurnal of Artificial Intelligence, 1998,104:1-69.

二级参考文献21

  • 1徐旭初,张道武,崔浩.合作联盟资源集成计划一种新方法[J].运筹与管理,2004,13(3):71-75. 被引量:2
  • 2赵书良,蒋国瑞,黄梯云.基于信用和关系网的Multi-agent System信任体系[J].计算机工程,2006,32(8):198-200. 被引量:6
  • 3Sarvapali Dyanand Ramchurn. Multi-agent negotiation using trust and persuasion: [ dissertation ]. Southampton : University of Southampton,2005.
  • 4Zhao S, Jiang G, Huang T, et al. The deception detection and restraint in multi-agent system[A]. In: Vincent Tam 17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence [C]. Hongkong: IEEE Computer Society, 2005 : 44 - 50.
  • 5Weinberger Yair B, Rosenschein Jeffrey S, Passive threats among agents in state oriented domains [A]. In: Lorenza Saitta. The Sixteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence [ C ]. Valencia: lOS Press, 2004:89 - 93.
  • 6Wu Jinghua, Jiang Guorui, Huang Tiyun. Using two main arguments in agent negotiation [ A ]. In: Toru Ishida. Ninth Pacific Rim International Workshop on Multi-Agents [C]. Guilin: Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI), 2006:578 - 583.
  • 7Fatima S, Wooldridge M, Jennings NR. Bargaining with incomplete information[ J]. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2005, 44(3) : 207 - 232.
  • 8Katzav J, Reed CA. A classification system for argument [ J]. In Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee Technical Report, 2004:1 -46.
  • 9Katzav J, Reed CA. On argumentation schemes and the natural classification of arguments[J]. Argumentation, 2004, 18(2) : 239-259.
  • 10Leen-kiat soh, Costas tsatsoulis. A real-time negotiation model and a multi-agent sensor network implementation [ J ]. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2005:1 - 57.

共引文献16

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部