期刊文献+

β-受体阻滞剂对主动脉瓣置换术后心室内压力阶差的影响 被引量:2

Effects of β-receptor Blocker on Intraventricular Pressure Gradient after Aortic Valve Replacement
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨β-受体阻滞剂对主动脉瓣重度狭窄行主动脉瓣置换术患者心室内压力阶差及其左心室重塑的影响。方法选取郑州大学第一附属医院2008年1月至2010年1月因单纯主动脉瓣重度狭窄行主动脉瓣置换术患者56例,将术后得到随访的32例患者在相同基础临床特征下分为两组,试验组:12例,常规口服β-受体阻滞剂(倍他乐克6.25-25.00 mg/次,2次/天);对照组:20例,未服用β-受体阻滞剂。在术后早期(1周内)、晚期(6-24个月)复查超声心动图,对两组患者随访的超声心动图指标进行比较。结果两组患者术后晚期随访无死亡,胸闷、气促等症状均明显改善。两组患者术后晚期左心室收缩期末内径(LVESD)、左心室流出道内径(LVOTD)较术后早期均有增加,仅试验组LVOTD与术后早期比较差异有统计学意义(t=-47.937,P=0.001);两组患者术后晚期室间隔厚度(IVS)、左心室后壁厚度(LVPWT)、左心室流出道射流速度(V)、心室压力阶差(G)、左心室心肌重量指数(LVMI)均较术后早期有所减小,以上指标试验组术后晚期与术后早期结果比较差异均有统计学意义(t=7.781,P=0.001;t=5.749,P=0.001;t=2.637,P=0.023;t=7.167,P=0.001;t=100.061,P=0.001),而对照组仅V、G和LVMI差异有统计学意义(t=4.051,P=0.001;t=4.759,P=0.001;t=-0.166,P=0.001);试验组EF值术后晚期与术后早期比较差异有统计学意义(t=-6.621,P=0.001)。组间比较:两组术后晚期EF值差异无统计学意义(t=-0.354,P=0.726),但术后晚期左心室舒张期末内径(LVEDD)、IVS、G和LVMI两组间比较差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.494,P=0.018;t=-3.434,P=0.002;t=-2.171,P=0.038;t=-2.316,P=0.028)。结论重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行主动脉瓣置换术后常规应用β-受体阻滞剂是安全、可靠的,可显著降低其残存的心室内压力阶差,并可加速改善左心室的重塑。 Objective To investigate the effects of β-receptor blocker on intraventricular pressure gradient and left ventricle remodeling after valve replacement for critical aortic stenosis. Methods Fifty-six patients with critical aortic stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement surgery from January 2008 to January 2010 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.Thirty-two of them who were followed up were selected to be enrolled in this study.The patients were divided into two groups under the same basis of clinical features.Twelve patients in the experimental group received oral β-receptor blocker(Metoprolol,6.25-25.00 mg once,twice daily).The rest 20 patients in the control group had no β-receptor blocker.The various indicators of ultrasound cardiogram(UCG) shortly after operation(within a week) and long after operation(6-24 months) were compared between the two groups. Results No death occurred in both groups,and chest distress,shortness of breath and other symptoms were obviously alleviated.Although left ventricular end-systolic dimension(LVESD) and left ventricular outflow tract dimension(LVOTD) of both groups increased 6-24 months after operation,compared with the early postoperative period,only the increase of LVOTD in the experimental group showed statistical difference(t=-47.937,P=0.001).In both groups,interventricular septum thickness(IVST),left ventricular posterior wall thickness(LVPWT),filament band velocity of left ventricular outflow tract(V),intraventricular pressure gradient(G) and left ventricular mass index(LVMI) of the later period after operation were significantly lower than those of the early postoperative period.All these indicators in the experimental group showed significant differences(t=7.781,P=0.001;t=5.749,P=0.001;t=2.637,P=0.023;t=7.167,P=0.001;t=100.061,P=0.001),while only V,G,and LVMI showed statistical differences in the control group(t=4.051,P=0.001;t= 4.759,P= 0.001;t=-0.166,P=0.001).EF in the experimental group also indicated significant difference compared with early period after aortic valve replacement(t=-6.621,P=0.001).EF between two groups indicated no significant difference(t=-0.354,P=0.726).But differences between the two groups in LVEDD,IVS,G,and LVMI were all statistically significant in the later period after surgery(t=-2.494,P=0.018;t=-3.434,P=0.002;t=-2.171,P=0.038;t=-2.316,P=0.028). Conclusion β-receptor blocker is a safe and reliable drug for those patients who have undergone aortic valve replacement surgery for critical aortic stenosis,and can decrease significantly the residual intraventricular pressure gradient and accelerate left ventricular cardiac remodeling.
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS 2011年第1期35-39,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
关键词 主动脉瓣置换术 Β-受体阻滞剂 左心室重塑 Aortic valve replacement β-receptor blocker Left ventricular cardiac remodeling
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Flores-Marin A,Gómez-Doblas JJ,Caballero-Borrego J,et al.Long-term predictors of mortality and functional recovery after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction.Rev Esp Cardiol,2010,63(1):36-45.
  • 2徐敬,赵文增,孙宏涛,杨栋.主动脉瓣置换术后的SAM现象[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2001,17(6):335-336. 被引量:4
  • 3Laurent M,Leborgne O,Clement C,et al.Systolic intracavitary gradients following aortic valve replacement:an echo Dopple study.Eur Heart J,1991,12(10):1098-1106.
  • 4Plante E,Lachance D,Champetier S,et al.Benefits of longterm beta-blockade in experimental chronic aortic regurgitation.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,2008,294(4):H1888-H1895.
  • 5陈珠,主译.心脏病学.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1289-1290.
  • 6饶莉,黄德嘉,曾智,黄鹤,Susanna Mohr-Kahaly.超声心动图评价主动脉瓣置换术后左心室收缩功能的改变[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2000,7(4):275-277. 被引量:1
  • 7Devereux RB,Reichek N.Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man.Anatomic validation of the method.Circulation,1977,55(4):613-818.
  • 8邱志兵,陈鑫,徐明,蒋英硕,石开虎,肖立琼,郭子璜.巨大左心室心脏瓣膜置换术后左心室重构的临床观察[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2006,13(3):155-157. 被引量:18
  • 9Hess OM,Ritter M,Schneider J,et al.Diastolic stiffness and myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before and after valve replacement.Circulation,1984,69(5):855-865.
  • 10Sim EK,Orszulak TA,Schaff HV,et al.Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,1994,8(6):293-297.

二级参考文献27

  • 1张宝仁,徐志云,邹良建,梅举,郝家骅,邢建洲.老年患者二尖瓣置换术265例分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2004,11(3):161-164. 被引量:25
  • 2ZHANGXi XUZhe XUYing-qi WANGZhi-ping WUZhong-kai TANGBai-yun XIONGMai YAOJian-ping SUNPei-wu ZHONGFo-tian.Surgical intervention for advanced valvular heart disease in 227 cases[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2005(12):989-994. 被引量:11
  • 3孙强,张永善,许运宾,孟国伟,李勇.心脏瓣膜病合并巨大左心室的外科治疗[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2005,12(3):226-226. 被引量:4
  • 4胡盛寿,张国平,朱晓东,肖明第,吴学军.巨大心脏瓣膜置换手术后远期疗效的观察[J].中华外科杂志,1996,34(3):164-166. 被引量:17
  • 5Sackner Bernstein JD. Use of carvedilol in chronic heart failure:challenges in therapeutic management. Pro Cardiovasc Dis, 1998,41(Suppl 1 ) :53-58.
  • 6Sahlgren B, Eklof AC, Aperia A. Studies of the renal component of the hypertension in rats with aortic construction: role of angiotensin Ⅱ. Acta Physiol Scand, 1986,127:443-448.
  • 7Ball EH, Jain N, Sanwal BD. Colligin, a collagen binding serpin.Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997.425:239-245.
  • 8Sauk JJ, Norris K, Moehring J, et al. The expression of colligin/hsp 47 after stress in human periodontal fibroblasts in vitro. Arch Oral Biol, 1990,35:645-651.
  • 9Ling Q, Chen TH, Guo ZG. Inhibition of beta-myosin heavy chain gene expression in pressure overload rat heart by losartan and captopril. Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao, 1997,18:63-66.
  • 10Baraone FC, Campbell WGJR, Nelson AH, et al. Carvedilol prevents severe hypertensive cardiomyopathy and remodeling. J Hypertens, 1998,16:871-884.

共引文献24

同被引文献28

  • 1刁明强,董力,江虹,周静,肖锡俊,张尔永.心脏机械瓣膜置换术后早期抗凝的方法分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2006,13(1):10-13. 被引量:23
  • 2Luszczak J, Olszowska M, Drapisz S, et al. Assessment of left ventricle function in patients with symptomatic and asymp- tomatic aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging[J]. Med Sci Monitt, 2012, 18(12):91-96.
  • 3Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Longitudinal myocardial shortening in aortic stenosis: ready for prime time after 30 years of re- search[J]. Heart, 2012, 96(2):95-96.
  • 4Miyazaki S, Daimon M, Miyazaki T, et al. Global longitudinal strain in relation to the severity of aortic stenosis: a two-di- mensional speckle-tracking study[J]. Echocardiography, 2011, 28(7):703-708.
  • 5Lee SP,Leew,Lee JM,et al.采用MR成像评估无症状主动脉瓣狭窄病人的弥漫性心肌纤维化[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2015,38(2):175.
  • 6Van Dalen BM, Tzikas A, Soliman OI, et al. Assessment of subendocardial contractile function in aortic stenosis: a study using speckle tracking echocardiography[J]. Echocardiora- phy, 2013, 30(3):293-300.
  • 7Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, et al. Outcome of pa- tients with aortic stenosis, small valve area and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection frac- tion[J]. J Am coll Cardiol, 2013, 13(13):735-1097.
  • 8Pereira JI, Lager MS, Bashir M, et al. Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Am Coil Cardiol, 2002, 39(8): 1356-1363.
  • 9Dumesnil IG, Pibarot P. Prevention of moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch: Individualization vs generalization. Rev Esp Cardiol, 2010, 63(4): 387-389.
  • 10Vicchio M, Delia A, De M, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly:survival, ventricular mass regression, and quality of life. Ann Thorac Sure. 2008. 86(6): 1791 - 1797.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部