1Schulz,R.A.Focus on form in the foreign language classroom:Students' and teachers'views on error correc- tion and the role of grammar.Foreign Language Annals,1996,29:343-364.
2Keh, C.L.Feedback in the writing process:a model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 1990,44 (4):294-304.
3Leki,I. Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response.In B.Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Re- search Insights for the Classroom. New York : Cambridge, 1990: 57 - 67.
4Cohen,A. ,& Cavalcanti, M. Feedback on compositions:teacher and student verbal reports.In B.Kroll (Ed.),Sec- ond Language Writing:Research In- sights for the Classroom.New York: Cambridge, 1990: 155- 177.
5Leki,I.The preferences oft ESL students for error correction in college- level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 1991,24(3):203-218.
6Enginarlar, H.Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System, 1993,21(2) : 193 - 204.
7Ferris,D. ,& Hedgcock, J. Teaching ESL Composition:Purpose,Process,and Practice. Mahwah,NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1998.
8Lee,I.Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms:The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Lan guage Writing, 2004, 13 : 285 - 312.
9Truscott,J.The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Lan- guage Learning, 1996,46(2) : 327 - 369.
10Itedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. Feed- back on feedback., assessing learnerreceptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1994,3 : 141 - 163.
3Cohen A D, Cavalcanti M C." Feedback on compositions: Teacher and students verbal reports" in B. Kroll (eds.) Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
4Ur P. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
5Keh C L. Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation[J]. ELT Journal,1990,( 4): 44.
