期刊文献+

Earthquake forecast via neutrino tomography

Earthquake forecast via neutrino tomography
原文传递
导出
摘要 We discuss the possibility of forecasting earthquakes by means of (anti)neutrino tomography. Antineutrinos emitted from reactors are used as a probe. As the antineutrinos traverse through a region prone to earthquakes, observable variations in the matter effect on the antineutrino oscillation would provide a tomography of the vicinity of the region. In this preliminary work, we adopt a simplified model for the geometrical profile and matter density in a fault zone. We calculate the survival probability of electron antineutrinos for cases without and with an anomalous accumulation of electrons which can be considered as a clear signal of the coming earthquake, at the geological region with a fault zone, and find that the variation may reach as much as 3% for νˉe emitted from a reactor. The case for a νe beam from a neutrino factory is also investigated, and it is noted that, because of the typically high energy associated with such neutrinos, the oscillation length is too large and the resultant variation is not practically observable. Our conclusion is that with the present reactor facilities and detection techniques, it is still a difficult task to make an earthquake forecast using such a scheme, though it seems to be possible from a theoretical point of view while ignoring some uncertainties. However, with the development of the geology, especially the knowledge about the fault zone, and with the improvement of the detection techniques, etc., there is hope that a medium-term earthquake forecast would be feasible. We discuss the possibility of forecasting earthquakes by means of (anti)neutrino tomography. Antineutrinos emitted from reactors are used as a probe. As the antineutrinos traverse through a region prone to earthquakes, observable variations in the matter effect on the antineutrino oscillation would provide a tomography of the vicinity of the region. In this preliminary work, we adopt a simplified model for the geometrical profile and matter density in a fault zone. We calculate the survival probability of electron antineutrinos for cases without and with an anomalous accumulation of electrons which can be considered as a clear signal of the coming earthquake, at the geological region with a fault zone, and find that the variation may reach as much as 3% for νˉe emitted from a reactor. The case for a νe beam from a neutrino factory is also investigated, and it is noted that, because of the typically high energy associated with such neutrinos, the oscillation length is too large and the resultant variation is not practically observable. Our conclusion is that with the present reactor facilities and detection techniques, it is still a difficult task to make an earthquake forecast using such a scheme, though it seems to be possible from a theoretical point of view while ignoring some uncertainties. However, with the development of the geology, especially the knowledge about the fault zone, and with the improvement of the detection techniques, etc., there is hope that a medium-term earthquake forecast would be feasible.
出处 《Chinese Physics C》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第4期325-332,共8页 中国物理C(英文版)
基金 Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) Special Grant of the Education Ministry of Chinafor Ph.D Programs
关键词 neutrino mass and mixing neutrino interactions EARTHQUAKES neutrino mass and mixing neutrino interactions earthquakes
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1de Rujula A,Glashow S L,Wilson R R et al.Phys.Rept.,1983,99:341-396.
  • 2Ioannisian A N,Smirnov A Y.2002,arXiv:hep-ph/0201012.
  • 3Ohlsson T,Winter W.Europhys.Lett.,2002,66(1):34-39.
  • 4Young B L.In the Proceedings for the Conference on the Advanced Topics in the Interdiscipilinary Fields of Parti cle Physics,Nuclear Physics and Cosmology.Tengchong,China,Aug.,2008.
  • 5Wilson T L.Nature,1984,309:38-42; Gonzalez-Garcia M C,Halzen F,Maltoni M et al.Phys.Rev.Lett.,2008,100:061802; Akhmedov E K,Tortola M A,Valle J W.F.JHEP,2005,0506:053; Lindner M,Ohlsson T,Tomas R et al.Astropart.Phys.,2003,19:755-770; Ohlsson T,Winter W.Phys.Lett.B,2001,512; 357-364; Jain P,Ralston J P,Frichter G M.Astropart.Phys.,1999,12:193-198; Sugawara H,Hagura H,Sanami T.2003,arXiv:hepph/0305062.
  • 6CAO Jun.Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl.,2006,155:229-230;CHEN Shao-Min.J.Phys.Conf.Ser.,2008,120:052024;White C.J.Phys.Conf.Ser.,2008,136:022012.
  • 7Dawson J.V.2009,arXiv:hep-ex/0905.4843.
  • 8Wolfenstein L.Phys.Rev.D,1978,17:2369-2374.
  • 9Mikheev S P,Smirnov A Y.Soy.J.Nucl.Phys.,1985,42:913-917; Nuovo Cim.C,1986,9:17-26.
  • 10Giunti C,Kim C W.Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics.New York:Oxford,2007.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部