摘要
目的:对比分析H-UPPP及等离子辅助的H-UPPP治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)的临床疗效,探索治疗OSAHS的有效术式。方法:用H-UPPP及等离子辅助的H-UPPP 2种术式分别治疗OSAHS患者35例及29例,随访6个月~3年,分析比较其疗效。结果:2种术式术前、术后PSG检测结果差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),2种术式总疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但等离子辅助的H-UP-PP组治愈率加显效率较高(P〈0.05)。结论:H-UPPP及等离子辅助的H-UPPP均为治疗OSAHS的有效术式,等离子辅助的H-UPPP术式对扩大咽腔左右径及增加软腭张力更有优势。
Objective:To compare the clinic effectiveness on OSAHS operated respectively by H-UPPP and plasma-assisted H-UPPP procedures,and to explore a utility operation procedure.Method:Thirty-five cases operated by H-UPPP and 29 cases by plasma-assisted H-UPPP,6~36 months followed-up,the effectiveness analyzed and compared.Result:The difference of polysomnogram results between preoperative and postoperative in the two operation procedures were significantly(P0.05).But the total effectiveness of H-UPPP and plasma-assisted H-UPPP procedures were found to be similar(P0.05),nevertheless plasma-assisted H-UPPP procedure has a higher curing and excellence rate(P0.05).Conclusion:The two operation procedures were in effect,the plasma-assisted H-UPPP procedure was more ascendant in extending the left and right diameter on pharyngeal cavity,increasing tension on soft palate.
出处
《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第6期258-261,共4页
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
基金
湖南省教委资助项目(No:05C459)
衡阳市科委资助项目(No:2009KS41)