期刊文献+

图像引导鼻咽癌调强放疗位置误差导致剂量差异分析 被引量:4

Analysis of dose deviation by set-up error in the image guided intensity modulated radiotherapy fornasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析千伏特锥形束CT(CBCT)对鼻咽癌调强放疗靶区中心位置变化及由位置偏差导致的剂量变化。方法对21例鼻咽癌患者调强放疗,全程376次CBCT得到每次靶区中心变化值。在上述变化值中随机抽取10、15次值输入逆向调强放疗计划系统中,照射角度、子野序列、权重等均不变,只对中心发生变化;累积10、15次偏差计划得到新的剂量分布,通过偏差公式得到相对应次数标准计划剂量偏差情况。结果未经校正的376次CBCT在左右、上下、前后方向的系统误差和随机误差分别为0.75mm和1.13mm,0.92mm和2.15mm,0.82mm和1.24mm,利用双参数模型计算CTV外扩4、6,4mm生成胛V,左右、上下、前后方向〈2mm的偏差比例分别为82.8%、76.0%、81.8%,〉3mm偏差分别为6.2%、9.8%、7.1%。在15次累积计划时靶区接受95%处方剂量(D95)偏差为-7.5%~-11.9%,D50的为-5.1%~-8.2%。结论每次较小的摆位误差可能对靶区或正常器官的剂量影响较小,但整个疗程累计30余次的误差结果可能导致较大剂量差异,通过双参数模型计算生成PTV并按PTV实现的计划和图像引导放疗可弥补这些剂量的不足。 Objective To discuss the set-up isocenter error based on kilovolt cone beam computed tomography (KVCBCT) and to investigate dose deviation led to set-up isocenter error. Methods 21 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with image guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) were investigated. The online KVCBCT scan, rigid image registration, set-up error was gained for 376 sets before radiotherapy. We sampled ten and fifteen setup isocenter error in the 376 sets randomly. Without changing beam angle, fields size and leaf sequences and dose weight et al. , we only replaced new isocenter and accumulated the new plan for ten or fifteen plans. We compared the percentage deviation between ten, fifteen times accumulated plans and normal ten , fifteen times plans. Results All 376 sets of KVCBCT image were analyzed for 21 cases. Under the condition of non-correction, the setup isocenter errors are 0. 75 mm±1.13 ram, 0. 92 mm±2. 15 ram,0. 82 mm±1.24 mm in left-right, superior-inferior and anterior- posterior directions respectively. So, we developed the margins which were 4 ram,6 ram,4 mm in three directions respectively from clinical tumor volume to planning tumor volume (PTV) calculated by two parameters model. In the fifteen accumulated plan, the deviation in the dose of 95% PTV ( D95 ) was -7. 5 % - - 11.9% , and the deviation in the Ds0 was -5.1% - -8.2%. Conclusions It is possible of small effects to normal organs and targets because of small error of patient displacement in one fraction. However, many small errors can led to considerable dose difference in targets and normal tissue in thirty fractions of all treatments period. So, according to two parameters model, PTV margin can be designed new olanning and deoended on IG-IMRT technique, which it will be significantly reduced these dose differences.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期160-163,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 成都军区“十一五”计划课题面上项目(MB09024)
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤/调强放射疗法 图像引导放疗 体层摄影术 X线计算机 锥形束 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/ intensity modulated radiotherapy Image guided radiotherapy Tomography,X-ray computed,cone beam
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Butler EB, Teh BS, Grant WH, et al. Smart Boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy. Int J radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,45:21-32.
  • 2Mohan R, Wu Q, Manning M, et al. Radiobiological considerations in the design of fractionation strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000 ,46 :619-630.
  • 3Stock M, Kroupa B, Georg D, et al. Interpretation and evaluation of the gamma index and gamma index angle for verification of IMRT hybrid plans. Phys Med Biol,2005,50:399-411.
  • 4金大伟,戴建荣,李晔雄,余子豪.前列腺癌调强放疗的治疗方案比较[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(1):47-51. 被引量:43
  • 5Yan D, Loekman D, Martinez A, et al. Computed tomography guided management of interfractional patient variation. Semin Radiat Onco1,2005,15 : 168-179.
  • 6Hong TS, Ritter MA, Tome WA, et al. Intensity modulated radiation therapy: emerging cancer treatment technology. Br J Cancer, 2005,92 : 1819 -1824.
  • 7王鑫,胡超苏,应红梅,朱国培,何少琴.摆位系统误差对鼻咽癌放疗剂量分布的影响[J].中国癌症杂志,2008,18(8):620-625. 被引量:55
  • 8潘建基,潘才住,陈传本,张秀春,柏朋刚.摆位系统误差对鼻咽癌调强放疗剂量的影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(5):394-396. 被引量:43
  • 9Van herk M, Kemeijer P, Lebesque JV. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation. Int J radiat Oncol Biol Phys ,2002,52 : 1407-1422.
  • 10Hamlet S, Ezzell G, Aref A. Larynx motion associated with swallowing during radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1994,28:467-470.

二级参考文献38

  • 1Gert O,Luc A,Werner RT,et al.Robert AP,Gerald EH,Shawn WM,et al. Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer with or without Intensity Modulated Beams:a Planning Comparison.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,47:639-648.
  • 2Robert AP, Gerald EH, Shawn WM, et al. Advantages of Using Noncoplanar vs Axial Beam Arrangements when Treating Prostate Cancer with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and the Step-and Shoot Delivery Method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,53:236-243.
  • 3Pollack A,Zagers Gk,Statkschall G,et al.Prostate Cancer Badiation Dose Response:results of the M.D.Anderson Phase Ⅲ Randomized Trial.lnt J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys,2002,53:1097-1105.
  • 4Storey MR,Pollack A,Zagars G,et al.Complications from Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Prostate Cancer:preliminary Results of A Randomized Trial.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,48:635-642.
  • 5Mohan R, Wu Q,Manning M,et al. Radiobiological considerations in the design of fractionation strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancers.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,46:619-630.
  • 6Bragg CM,Conway J,Robinson MH,et al.The role of intersity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of parotid tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,52:729-738.
  • 7Hunt M. The effect of positional uncertainties on the treatment of primary nasopharynx cancer. Med Phys, 1989,16:456 - 464.
  • 8Stroom JC, de Boer JC, Huizenga H, et al. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999,43:905-919.
  • 9Stroom JC, Heijmen BJ. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU - 62 report. Radiother Oncol, 2002,64:75 - 83.
  • 10ICRU Report 50: prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. Bethesda:Intemational Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements(ICRU), 1993 : 1-72.

共引文献125

同被引文献25

  • 1潘建基,郑步宏,张瑜,陈传本,李金莲,张秀春.鼻咽癌适形放疗中摆位误差的测定[J].癌症,2006,25(1):115-118. 被引量:14
  • 2岳金波,于金明,刘菁,尹勇,刘同海,卢洁.锥形束CT测量鼻咽癌放疗计划靶区外放研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(3):223-224. 被引量:5
  • 3何强,荆保国,朱云.鼻咽癌放射治疗中不同摆位技术方法的精度比较[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(10):1538-1540. 被引量:2
  • 4许峰,柏森,王瑾,张洪,钟仁明,蒋晓芹.用锥形束CT图像测量放疗摆位误差[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(6):461-464. 被引量:60
  • 5Nithiananthan S, Schafer S, Uneri A, et al. Demons deformable regis- tration of CT and cone-beam CT using an iterative intensity matching approach [J]. Med Phys, 2011, 38(4): 1785-1798.
  • 6Varian Medical Systems OBI 1.5 Physics Course[M]. 2013, 1:1-230.
  • 7Hurkmans CW, Rcmcijer P, Lcbcsque JV, ct al. Set-up verification us- ing portal imaging; review of current clinical practice[J]. Radiothera- py and oncology, 2001, 58(2): 105-12.
  • 8ICRU. Reports 62 ICIU Publication [C].
  • 9Lei X, Brian T, Eduard S. Overview of imageguided radiation ther- apy[J]. Med Dosimetry, 2006, 31: 91-112.
  • 10van Herk M, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV, et al. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol BiolPhys,2002,52(5):1407-1422.

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部