期刊文献+

单纯后外侧融合术治疗腰椎滑脱的临床研究 被引量:8

Clinical results of posterolateral fusion in treating lumbar low-grade spondylolisthesis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨轻度腰椎滑脱减压复位后单纯行后外侧融合(PLF)的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2001年10月至2008年7月收治的37例轻度腰椎滑脱行单纯PLF患者的临床资料.其中男性9例,女性28例;年龄27~88岁,平均60.1岁.术前和末次随访时采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分进行临床评价,融合及复位后丢失情况采用X线片及CT进行评价.结果 37例患者均获随访,随访时间14~96个月,平均36.4个月.术后滑脱复位率为76.4%,末次随访时34例(91.9%)出现复位丢失,平均丢失5.8%(-3.0%~25.8%).术前、术后及末次随访的滑脱率比较差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000);术后椎间盘高度与术前、末次随访之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);末次随访腰前凸角度与术前、术后之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);末次随访VAS和ODI评分与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000).X线片和CT评价融合率分别为91.9%和94.6%.并发症有出现退变性侧凸2例,术后14个月出现上方邻近节段后滑脱1例,术后24个月出现螺钉切割断裂1例,术后早期出现伤口感染行清创术1例.结论 轻度腰椎滑脱患者复位后行单纯PLF中期随访时普遍存在滑脱矫正少量丢失现象,但临床效果及融合率尚可. Objective To analyze the clinical outcomes and losses of correction for posterolateral fusion on low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From October 2001 to July 2008, 37 patients with a mean age of 60. 1 years ( range, 27-88 years ) with low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral fusion, including 9 males and 28 females, were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The fusion status and loss of correction were assessed using plain radiographs and CT. Results All the 37 patients had got complete follow-up for 14-96 months (average 36. 4 months); post-operative reduction rate was 76.4%, and 34 patients (91.9%) showed loss of correction with a mean loss rate 5. 8% ( range,-3.0%-25.8% ). The percentage of slip of pre-operative, post-operative and final follow-up indicated significant difference( P < 0. 05 )compared with each other; post-operative intervertebral disc height indicated significant difference in comparison with that of pre-operatively and at final follow-up( P < 0. 05 ); lumbar lordosis angle at final follow-up showed significant difference when compared with that of pre-operatively and postoperatively (P < 0. 05); VAS and ODI at final follow-up indicated significant difference in contrast to that of pre-operative (P < 0.05 ). Upon final follow-up, the complications were found in 2 cases who presented degenerative scoliosis at 15 and 17 months after the surgery, in 1 case with cranial adjacent segment retrolisthesis at the 14 months after the surgery, in 1 case with cut-out and breakage of screws at the 24 months after the surgery, and in 1 case with postoperative infection which were cured after debridement. Conclusions For mid-term follow-up of low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis, posterolateral fusion shows loss of correction in most cases, but presents good clinical outcome and fusion rate.
机构地区 中国医学科学院
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期119-124,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 脊椎前移 脊柱融合术 治疗结果 并发症 Spondylolisthesis Spinal fusion Treatment outcome Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Suk SI,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al.Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1997,22:210-220.
  • 2Madan S,Boeree NR.Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2002,27:1536-1542.
  • 3Ekman P,S(o)ller H,Tullberg T,et al.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2007,32:2178-2183.
  • 4Kim KT,Lee SH,Lee YH,et al.Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2006,31:1351-1358.
  • 5Christensen FB,Hansen ES,Eiskjaer SP,et al.Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation:a prospective,randomized clinical study of 146 patients.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2002,27:2674-2683.
  • 6Videbaek TS,Christensen FB,Soegaard R,et al.Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion:long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2006,31:2875-2880.
  • 7Soegaard R,Bunger CE,Christiansen T,et al.Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective:cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe,chronic low back pain.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2007,32:2405-2414.
  • 8Lenke LG,Bridwell KH,Bullis D,et al.Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis.J Spinal Disord,1992,5:433-442.
  • 9Taillard WF.Etiology of spondylolisthesis.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1976:30-39.
  • 10Ha KY,Na KH,Shin JH,et al.Comparison of posterolateral fusion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.J Spinal Disord Tech,2008,21:229-234.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Posffusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord, 1995,8:464-473.
  • 2Yang KH, King AL. Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain. Spine, 1984,9 : 557-565.
  • 3Chou WY, Hsu CJ, Chang WN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal postemlateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Stag,2002,122:39-43.
  • 4Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine, 1988, 13:375-377.
  • 5Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J, 2001,10:314-319.
  • 6Rahm MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord,1996, 9:392-400.
  • 7Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, et al. Adjacent-segment morbidity after Graf ligamentoplasty compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg, 2001, 95 Suppl 1:5-10.
  • 8Ishihara H, Osada R, Kanamori M, et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord, 2001,14 : 91-99.
  • 9Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, et al. Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoporative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion.Spine, 2000,25: 1837-1842.
  • 10Penta M, Sandhu A, Fraser RD. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine, 1995, 20: 743-747.

共引文献37

同被引文献77

  • 1海涌,陈晓明,陈志明,邹德威,马华松,邵水霖,周雪峰.后路椎间融合术治疗成人腰椎滑脱的前瞻性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(10):586-589. 被引量:66
  • 2董福龙,申才良,张建湘,汤健,杨庆国,江曙.Basis椎弓根螺钉固定加环形植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱[J].临床骨科杂志,2011,14(6):627-630. 被引量:7
  • 3西永明,贾连顺.退行性腰椎滑脱外科治疗中的相关问题[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(1):65-67. 被引量:55
  • 4曾忠友,曾玮,金才益,裴仁模,吴立东,江春宇.下腰椎椎弓根螺钉内固定术后翻修[J].国际骨科学杂志,2006,27(6):377-379. 被引量:1
  • 5McAfee PC, DeVine JG, Chaput CD,et al. The indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis: analysis of 120 cases[J]. Spine, 2004, 4(6):644-649.
  • 6Khan JA, Bajracharya AR.Surgical treatment ofisthmic spondylolisthesis with radicular pain in adults [J]. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, 2007,46 (168):170-174.
  • 7Floman Y, Millgrarn MA, Ashkenazi E, et al. Instrumented slip reduction and fusion for painful unstable isthmie spondylolisthesis in adults [J]. Spinal Disord Tech,2008,21 (7):477-483.
  • 8Sasso RC, Shively KD, Reilly TM.Transvertebral Transsacral strut grafting for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis L5-S1 with fibular allografl[J]. Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21(5):328-333.
  • 9Prybis BG, Fedder IL, Cunningham BW,et al.Comparison between posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in adult spondylolisthesis [J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr,2007,65(3 B):764-770.
  • 10Lee SH, Choi WG, Lim SR, et al. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005,30(6 Suppl): $60-65.

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部