期刊文献+

流动树脂用于预防性树脂充填的临床疗效观察 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的以传统的复合树脂+窝沟封闭方法为对照组,观察流动树脂在预防性树脂充填(preventive resin restoration,PRR)治疗中的临床疗效。方法选择门诊就诊儿童中至少一对同名恒磨牙有小的窝沟龋或窝沟可疑龋为研究对象,随机选择一侧为观察组,对侧为对照组;观察组用流动树脂充填预备好的窝沟及周围无龋的窝沟,对照组用复合树脂充填预备好的窝沟,周围无龋窝沟用窝沟封闭剂封闭。结果经过0.5年、1年、2年三个时间点的观察,观察组治疗成功率每年均高于对照组,在1年、2年时二者的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对小的窝沟龋或窝沟可疑龋预防性树脂充填治疗中,应用流动树脂充填较传统的复合树脂+窝沟封闭有更好的临床疗效。
作者 孙志滢 陈述
出处 《中国煤炭工业医学杂志》 2011年第3期337-338,共2页 Chinese Journal of Coal Industry Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1Simonsen JR. Preventive resin restoration ( Ⅰ ). Quintessence Int,1978,9:69 - 76.
  • 2Simonsen JR. Preventive resin restoration ( Ⅱ ). Quintessence Iht,1978, 9: 95 - 102.
  • 3Strassler HE, Goodman, HS. A durable flowable composite resin for preventive resin restorations. Dent - Today. 2002,21:116 - 121.
  • 4Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives.Dent Mater, 1999, 15:128- 137.
  • 5Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, et al. A characterization of first- generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc, 1998,129:567 - 577.
  • 6Estafan AM, Estafan D: Microleakage study of flowable composite resin system. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2000,21:705- 708,710,712,quiz 714.
  • 7Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, et al. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.Oper Dent, 2001, 26:302-307.
  • 8Hiekel R, Dasch W, Janda R, et al. New direct restorative materials[J]. Int Dent J,1998, 48( 1 ) :3 - 16.
  • 9Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Blum IR, et al. Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations [ J ]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2003, 134 (5) :317 - 323.
  • 10Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swirl E J, et al. A characterization of first generation flowable composites [ J ]. J Am Dent Assoc,1998, 129(5) : 567 -577.

共引文献70

同被引文献36

  • 1李明,李大鲁.单粉型玻璃离子水门汀修复复面Ⅱ类洞邻面的应用效果[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2005,8(4):415-415. 被引量:1
  • 2谢富强.预防性Dyractflow流动复合体充填窝沟龋的临床效果[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(3):409-411. 被引量:5
  • 3徐美玉.Dyract flow流动复合体与光固化窝沟封闭剂治疗磨牙窝沟龋的临床比较[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(4):562-563. 被引量:5
  • 4Simonsen RJ. Stallard RE. Sealant-restorations utilizing a diluted filled resin:One year results[J]. Quintessence Int. 1977, 8(6): 77.
  • 5Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports ofrandomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary[J]. Control Clinic Trials, 1996,17(1): 1-12.
  • 6王忠, 周莹. 不同预防性充填材料临床效果分析[J]. 健康必读,2012,11(10):208-209.
  • 7Jafarzadeh M, Malekafzali B, Tadayon N, et al. Retention of a FlowableComposite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant:One-year Follow-up[J].Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of MedicalSciences,2010, 7(1): 1-5.
  • 8Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Gareia L, et al. Randimized, controlled trialcomparing the retention of a flowable restorative systerm with a conventionalresin sealant: one-year follow up[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent,2005,15(1): 44-50.
  • 9Oba AA, Sonmez IS, Ercan E, et al. Comparison of retention rates of fissuresealants using two flowable restoration materials and conventional resin sealant:two-year follow-up[J]. Med Princ Prut, 2012, 21(3): 234-237.
  • 10Rabello T. Research proposal: evaluation of the ART approach in elderlypatients[J]. J Appl Oral Sci,2006,14(spe): 30-33.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部