期刊文献+

集束化治疗对严重脓毒症患者预后的前瞻性随机对照研究 被引量:10

Effects of sepsis bundles on prognosis of patients with severe sepsis: a prospective, randomized, controlled Trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究集束化治疗对综合ICU严重脓毒症患者预后的影响。方法:选2007年10月至2009年12月收住ICU的18岁以上严重脓毒症患者,随机分配入集束化治疗组和对照组,观察两组患者序贯器官衰竭估计(SOFA)评分的变化及血管活性药物使用时间、28d机械通气时间、ICU停留时间和28d病死率。结果:集束化治疗组入选后3d和7dSOFA评分均明显低于对照组同期(P<0.05);集束化治疗组血管活性药物使用时间、28d内机械通气时间、ICU停留时间均短于对照组,28d病死率绝对值下降20%,其中血管活性药物使用时间和ICU停留时间缩短具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:集束化治疗可以明显改善严重脓毒症患者的预后。 Objective To study the effects of sepsis bundles on prognosis of patients with severe sepsis. Methods Patients with severe sepsis, over 18 years old, at the ICU from October 2007 to December 2009,were randomly divided into sepsis bundle group and control group. The SOFA score, the vasoactive agent application times, the mechanical ventilation times at day 28, length of ICU stay, and 28-day mortality of the two groups were recorded. Results As compared to control group, SOFA score at day 3 and 7, the vasoactive agent application times, the mechanical ventilation times at day 28, and length of ICU stay were decreased in the sepsis bundle group (P 〈 0.05). And the patients in the sepsis bundle group had a lower 28-day mortality rate than those did in control group (21.9% vs. 41.9%). Conclusion Application of the sepsis bundles could improve the prognosis of patients with severe sepsis.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第7期1183-1186,共4页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金 佛山市重点科技攻关项目(编号:200708029)
关键词 脓毒症 集束化治疗 预后 随机对照试验 Sepsis bundle Severe sepsis Prognosis Randomized controlled trials
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Balk R A. Severe sepsis and septic shock: definitions, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations [J]. Crit Care Clin 2000, 16( 1 ) : 179-192.
  • 2Gao F, Melody T, Daniels D F, et al. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis : a prospective observational study [J]. Crit Care, 2005,9(6):R764-R770.
  • 3Kortgen A, Niederprtim P, Bauer M. Implementation of an evidence-based standard operating procedure and outcome in septic shock [J]. Crit Care Med, 2006,34(3):943-949.
  • 4Nguyen H B, Corbett S W, Steele R, et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortalitv [J]. Crit Care Med. 2007.35(4), 1105-1112.
  • 5Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy M M, et al. Improvement in process of care and outcome after a muhicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain [J]. JAMA, 2008,299(19): 2294-2303.
  • 6Zambon M, Ceola M, Almeida-de-Castro R, et al. Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: we could go faster [J]. J Crit Care, 2008,23 (4) : 455 -460.
  • 7陈齐红,郑瑞强,林华,汪华玲,卢年芳,邵俊,於江泉.感染性休克集束治疗对病死率影响的前瞻性临床研究[J].中国危重病急救医学,2008,20(9):534-537. 被引量:25
  • 8吴健锋,陈娟,欧阳彬,杨春华,陈敏英,黄顺伟,管向东.集束化治疗依从性及对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克病人病死率影响的研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(12):1006-1008. 被引量:5
  • 9Dellinger R P, Carlet J M, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis andseptic shock [J]. Crit Care Med, 2004,32(3):858-873.
  • 10Dellinger R P, Levy M M, Cadet J M, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2008,34 (1):17-60.

二级参考文献19

共引文献27

同被引文献70

引证文献10

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部