期刊文献+

中美贸易不平衡中的宏观经济因素:基于结构VAR模型的实证研究 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在实际经济周期理论框架下研究中美两国的实际产出、实际汇率和贸易收支之间的相互关系,并利用结构VAR模型进行实证分析,从而找出决定中美贸易不平衡的宏观经济因素。实证结果发现:中美贸易不平衡最主要原因是美国国内过度膨胀的需求,其对两国不平衡的影响程度最大并且持续时间最长,同时,人民币对美元汇率的贬值也是导致不平衡的原因,但它的影响却十分有限。本文最后对中美贸易不平衡的调整提出了政策建议。
出处 《世界经济文汇》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期25-37,共13页 World Economic Papers
基金 感谢国家社会科学基金项目(10CGJ021)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Ahmed, S. , 1993, "International Business Cycles," American Economic Review, 83 (3), 335-359.
  • 2Cbinn, M. and H. ho, 2007, "Current account balances, financial development and institutions: Assaying the world 'saving glut' " Journal of International Morte)" and Finance, 26(4) , 546-569.
  • 3Cho, G. and W. Koo, 2004, "The Trade Imbalance between the United States and China: The Role of Exchange Rate and Trade Liberalization, " Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report, 548, 1-26.
  • 4Cooper, R. , 2008, "Global Imbalances : Globalization, Demography, and Sustainability," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 93-112.
  • 5Coudert, V. and C. Couh',n'de, 2007, "Real Equilibrium Exchange Rate in China," Journal of Asian Economics, 18(4), 568-594.
  • 6Edwards, S. , 2007, "On Current Account Surpluses and the Correction of Global Imbalances," NBER Working Paper, No. W12904.
  • 7Funke, M. and J. Rahn, 2005, "Just how Undervalued is the Chinese Renminbi?" The World Economy, 28(4), 465-489.
  • 8Groenewold, N. and L. He, 2007, "The US-China Trade Imbalance," Economics Letters, 96(1), 127-132.
  • 9King, R. , C. Plosser and S. Rebelo, 1988, "Production, Growth, and Business Cycles : The Basic Neoclassical Model," Journal of Monetary Economics, 21, 195-232.
  • 10Nadenichek, J. , 2000, "The Japan-US Trade Imbalance: a Real Business Cycle Perspective," Japan and the World Econo- my, 12(3). 255-277.

二级参考文献66

共引文献469

同被引文献91

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部