期刊文献+

珠江三角洲新垦大气核化速率研究 被引量:3

Atmospheric Nucleation Rate at Xinken Site in the Pearl River Delta of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 计算了珠江三角洲新垦地区的大气核化速率,对核化机制及核化速率计算的影响因素进行了分析.基于PRIDE-PRD2004观测实验期间新垦站点的气溶胶数浓度谱分布观测数据,计算出3 nm粒子的表观形成速率.根据表观形成速率与核化速率之间的关系式,分析了1 nm粒径临界核的大气核化速率.结果表明,新粒子事件期间3 nm粒子的表观形成速率为7.2~9.4 cm-3.s-1,1 nm临界核的大气核化速率为7.65×102~1.14×105 cm-3,与前体物硫酸蒸气浓度比较一致,气态硫酸应是主要的核化前体物.新垦地区背景气溶胶中积聚模态对碰并汇贡献较大,事件期间气溶胶数浓度变化对核化速率计算结果影响不大.本研究获取了新垦核化速率信息,有助于进一步了解核化机制.由于成核临界粒径的不确定性对核化速率计算结果影响很大,确定成核临界粒径对核化速率计算十分重要. The atmospheric nucleation rates are calculated,the nucleation mechanism and factors affecting the calculation are investigated at Xinken Site in the Pearl River Delta of China.Based on particle size distribution data from Xinken site during PRIDE-PRD2004,the apparent formation rates of 3 nm particles are obtained.Nucleation rates for critical nuclei of 1 nm size are analyzed from particle flux equation of different size in the diameter axis.The results show the 3 nm apparent formation rates during the new particle formation events are 7.2-9.4 cm-3.s-1,the atmospheric nucleation rate for 1 nm critical nuclei are 7.65 × 102-1.14 × 105 cm-3.The derived nucleation rates are consistent with the concentrations of precursor vapor sulphuric acid,which are supposed to participate nucleation in most cases.With higher contribution of accumulation mode background aerosol to coagulation sink,the variation in particle number during event period imposes neglectable influence on the calculated nucleation rates.Information on nucleation rates provide further insight into the nucleation mechanism.Since variation in critical nuclei size may lead large uncertainty to nucleation rates,identification of the exact critical nuclei size is important for nucleation rate study.
出处 《环境科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期930-935,共6页 Environmental Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40805052,41005065,40975089)
关键词 PRIDE-PRD2004 新粒子形成 表观形成速率 核化速率 临界核 PRIDE-PRD2004 new particle formation apparent formation rate nucleation rate critical nuclei
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Jung C H, Kim Y P. Numerical estimation of the effects of condensation and coagulation on visibility using the moment method[ J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2006. 37: 143-161.
  • 2Peters A, Wichmann H E, Tueh T, et al. Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles[J]. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997, 155 (4) : 1376-1383.
  • 3Anderson T L, Charlson R J, Schwartz S E, et al. Climate forcing by aerosols-a hazy picture [ J ]. Science, 2003, 300: 1103-1104.
  • 4Kulmala M, Vehkamaki H, Petaja T, et al. Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review ofobservalions[ JJ. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2004, 35: 143- 176.
  • 5Dal Maso M, Kulmala M, Riipinen I, et al. Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR Ⅱ, Hyytiala, Finland[J]. Boreal Environment Research, 2005, 10(5): 323-336.
  • 6Kulmala M. How panicle nucleate and grow [J]. Science, 2003, 302: 1000-1001.
  • 7Pirjola L, Lebtinen K E J, Hansson H C, et al. How important is nucleation in regional/global modelling? [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31( 12): L12109.
  • 8Seinfeld J H, Pandis S N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From air pollution to climate change[ M ]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995. 545-595.
  • 9Korhonen P, Kulmala M, Laaksonen A, et al. Ternary nucleation of H2SO4 , NH3 , and H20 in the atmosphere [ J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104 ( D21 ) : 26349- 26353.
  • 10Yu F, Turco R P. Ultrafine aerosol formation via ion-mediated nucleation[ J ]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2000, 27 : 883- 886.

二级参考文献38

  • 1Kerminen, V.-M., L. Pirjola, and M. Kulmala, 2001: How significantly does coagulational scavenging limit atmospheric particle production? J. Geophys. Res., 106, 24119-24125.
  • 2Kulmala, M., 2003: How particles nucleate and grow. Science, 307, 1000-1001.
  • 3Ansmann, A., R. Engelmann, D. Althausen, U. Wandinger, M. Hu, Y. H. Zhang, and Q. S. He, 2005: High aerosol load over the Pearl River Delta, China, observed with Raman lidar and Sun photometer. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L13815, doi: 10.1029/2005GL023094.
  • 4Birmili, W., A. Nowak, K. Schwirn, K. Lehmann, A. Massling, and A. Wiedensohler, 2004: A new method to accurately relate dry and humidified number size distributions of atmospheric aerosols. Journal of Aerosol Science, Abstracts of EAC, Budapest, 1, 15- 16.
  • 5Boy, M., and Coauthors, 2005: Sulphuric acid closure and contribution to nucleation mode particle growth. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5, 863-878.
  • 6Cheng, Y. F., and Coauthors, 2006: Mixing state of elemental carbon and non-light-absorbing aerosol com- ponents derived from in situ particle optical properties at Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China. J. Geophus. Res.. 111. doi:10.1029/2005JD006929.
  • 7Coffman, D. J., and D. A. Hegg, 1995: A preliminary study of the effect of ammonia on particle nucleation in the marine boundary layer. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 7147-7160.
  • 8Dal Maso, M., M. Kulmala, I. Riipinen, R. Wagner, T. Hussein, P. P. Aalto, and K. E. J. Lehtinen, 2005:Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR Ⅱ, Hyytiala, Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 10, 323-336.
  • 9DeMore, W. B., and Coauthors, 1997: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modeling. Evaluation No. 12, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publication 97-4, 278pp.
  • 10Ehhalt, D. H., and F. Rohrer, 2000: Dependence of OH concentration on solar UV. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3565-3571.

共引文献4

同被引文献58

  • 1Woo K S,Chen D R,Pui D Y H,et al.Measurement of Atlanta aerosol size distributions:observations of ultrafine particle events [J].Aerosol Science and Technology,2001,34(1):75-87.
  • 2Dunn M J,Jimenez J L,Baumgardner D,et al.Measurements of Mexico City nanoparticle size distributions:observations of new particle formation and growth [J].Geophysical Research Letters,2004,31(10):L10102.1-L10102.4.
  • 3Birmili W,Wiedensohler A.New particle formation in the continental boundary layer:meteorological and gas phase parameter influence [J].Geophysical Research Letters,2000,27(20):3325--3328.
  • 4Birmili W,Berresheim H,Plass-Dülmer C,et al.The Hohenpeissenberg aerosol formation experiment(HAFEX):a long-term study including size-resolved aerosol,H2SO4,OH,and monoterpenes measurements [J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2003,3(2):361-376.
  • 5O\'Dowd C D,McFiggans G,Greasey D J,et al.On the photochemical production of new particles in the coastal boundary layer [J].Geophysical Research Letters,1999,26(12):1707-1710.
  • 6Perry K D,Hobbs P V.Further evidence for particle nucleation in clear air adjacent to marine cumulus clouds [J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1994,99(D11):22803-22818.
  • 7Clarke A D,Davis D,Kapustin V N,et al.Particle nucleation in the tropical boundary layer and its coupling to marine sulfur sources [J].Science,1998,282(5386):89-92.
  • 8Twohy C H,Clement C F,Gandrud B W,et al.Deep convection as a source of new particles in the midlatitude upper troposphere [J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2002,107(D21):AAC6.1-AAC6.10.
  • 9Kuang C,McMurry P H,McCormick A V.Determination of cloud condensation nuclei production from measured new particle formation events [J].Geophysical Research Letters,2009,36(9):L09822.1-L09822.5.
  • 10Lihavainen H,Kerminen V M,Komppula M,et al.Production of "potential" cloud condensation nuclei associated with atmospheric new-particle formation in northern Finland [J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2003,108(D24):AAC11.1-AAC11.8.

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部