期刊文献+

判定技术直达去向合理性的静态条件和动态条件方法 被引量:2

The Static Condition and Dynamic Condition for Technical Direct Trains' Rationality Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了判定技术直达去向的合理性,提出静态条件和动态条件2种判定方法。静态条件方法是指:根据铁路运输组织学中的必要条件生成车流强度标准的计算公式,以列车平均编组辆数作为表格的横向表头,以运行里程作为纵向表头,形成技术直达去向的车流强度标准汇总表。动态条件方法是指:根据铁路运输组织学中的充分条件生成车流强度标准的计算公式,结合现场的最远站改编法则确定技术直达去向的车流强度标准。结合实例阐述静态条件和动态条件的计算过程及使用方法。通过对比分析得知,静态条件方法适用于评价规划技术直达去向的合理性,动态条件方法适用于评价既有技术直达去向的合理性。 This paper proposes static condition method and dynamic condition method for technical direct trains' rationality evaluation. The static condition method is that: according to the necessary condition in railway transportation theory, developing the formula of car flow intensity standard, with the average car number of each train as the horizontal header and the traveling mileage of each train as the vertical header, the summary table for car flow intensity standard of technical direct trains is built up. The dynamic condition method is that: based on the sufficient condition in railway transportation theory, generating the formula of car flow intensity standard, combined with the actual operations' discipline that cars are organized into the longest distance train to adaptation, targeted directly to determine the car flow intensity standard of technical direct trains. With examples, the calculation procedure and application method of static condition and dynamic condition are explained. By comparing the results, static condition method is suitable for planning technical direct trains' rationality evaluation, and dynamic condition method is appropriate for existing technical direct trains' rationality evaluation.
出处 《中国铁道科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期116-120,共5页 China Railway Science
基金 铁道部科技研究开发计划项目(2009X004-A 2009X005-B 2009X013-G)
关键词 技术直达 编组计划 车流组织 车流强度 静态条件 动态条件 Technical direct train Train formation plan Car flow organization Car flow intensity Static Dynamic condition
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献14

  • 1朱松年,曹家明,赵强,杜文.车流组织综合优化[J].铁道学报,1993,15(3):59-69. 被引量:16
  • 2孙晚华,郑时德.编组站到达流生成方法的研究[J].北方交通大学学报,1994,18(4):499-505. 被引量:6
  • 3郑时德 吴汉琳.铁路行车组织[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1988.171-174.
  • 4苗邦均,李致中.技术直达列车最优方案的算法[J].西南交通大学学报,1978,(8).
  • 5[3]胡思继.铁路行车组织.北京:中国铁道出版社,2001.
  • 6[5]林伯梁.车流运行径路与列车编组计划的整体优化模型及模拟退火算法:[D].成都:西南交通大学,1994:31-46.
  • 7Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L. Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 8 (2): 173-195.
  • 8Zitzler E , Thiele L. Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 3 (4) : 257-271.
  • 9滕传琳 主编,林瑞耕,黄燕 责任编.管理运筹学[M]中国铁道出版社,1986.
  • 10M. Lundy,A. Mees. Convergence of an annealing algorithm[J] 1986,Mathematical Programming(1):111~124

共引文献43

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部