期刊文献+

65岁以上老年患者腰椎融合术后的结果手术枝术

Outcome of Lumbar Arthrodesis in Patients Sixty-five Years of Age or Older Surgical Technique
原文传递
导出
摘要 背景:有关老年患者腰椎融合术的价值在以往的文献中报道不多。大多数文献都集中于关注老年患者腰椎融合术并发症的发生率,本研究试图通过与年轻患者的比较,明确老年患者腰椎融合术的临床结果。方法:我们对224例患者进行了单节段腰椎后外侧融合,术中均采用髂骨植骨。结果的评价指标包括Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、整体健康状况36项简明调查问卷(MOSSF-36),腰背痛和腿痛的数字量表,以及融合情况的X线评价。根据患者的平均值变化以及达到临床重要差异最小阈值患者的百分比来对临床结果进行评价。作为比较,将这些患者分为两组:年龄小于65岁者174例和年龄65岁或65岁以上者50例。结果:在6个月、1年以及2年时,和基线水平相比,所有患者临床和健康相关的生活质量评价均有明显的改善。术后2年时老年患者ODI评分平均改善28.5分,年轻患者为24.5分。SF-36身体状态部分的总分,术后2年时老年组相对基线水平平均改善14.2分,年轻组为11.7分。同样,腰背痛和腿痛的数字量表在各个时期的改善程度,老年组均与年轻组类似或更好,术后2年时腿痛评分的差异有统计学意义(老年患者为10.4,年轻患者为6.4;p=0.002)。围手术期的并发症虽然人们对此很有顾虑,但是从术后2年时的情况来看,其并未对临床和健康相关生活质量的结果产生明显的不良影响。结论:本研究显示对椎间盘退变性疾病行腰椎单节段减压内固定融合可使年龄65岁以上的患者明显受益,我们认为对这些患者只要进行适当的筛选,腰椎融合术仍可以作为一个有效且可行的治疗选择。可信水平:预后性研究旦堡。关于证据等级的完整描述详见投稿须知。
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期I0012-I0018,共7页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Brox Jl.Reikeras O,Nygaard Ф,sorense R,Indahl A,Holm I,Keller A,Ingebrigtsen T,Grundnes O,Lange JE,Friis A,Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercise in paltients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc hermiation:a prospective randomized contrlled study .Pain.2006;122:145-55.
  • 2Brox Jl, Sorensen R. Friis A, NygaardФ lndahl A, Keller A, lngebrigtsen T, Eriksen HR, Holm 1, Koller AK, Riise R, Reiker'as O. Randomized clinical trial ~ff lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine, 2003;28:1913-21.
  • 3Ekman P, Moller H, Tullberg T, Neumann P, Hedlund R. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2007;32:2178-83.
  • 4Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessherg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine. 2001 ;26:2521-34.
  • 5Ha KY, Na KH Shin JH, Kim KW. Comparison of posterolateral fu-sion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:.229-34.
  • 6Han X, Zhu Y, Cui C, Wu Y. A meta-analysis of circumferential fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine, Spine. 2009;34:E618-25.
  • 7Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Burkus JK, Pryor PW, Hardacker JW, Carreon LY. Two-year fusion and clinical outcomes in 224 patients treated with a single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion with iliae crest bone graft. Spine J. 2009;9:880-5.
  • 8Tosteson AN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Herkowitz H, Albert T, Boden SD, Bridwell K, Longley M, Andersson GB, Blood EA, Grove MR, Weinstein JN; SPORT Investigators. Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:845-53.
  • 9Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Blood EA, Tosteson AN, Birkmeyer N, Herkowitz H, Longley M, Lenke L, Emery S, Hu SS. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observalional cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1295-304.
  • 10Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year resuits for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine. 2008;33:2789-800.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部