期刊文献+

助听器瞬态噪声抑制策略(AntiShock^(TM))对聆听舒适度的影响研究

The Effects of a Transient Noise Reduction Strategy(AntiShock^(TM)) on Listening Comfort of Hearing Aid Users
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比评估助听器瞬态噪声抑制策略(AntiShockTM)关闭与开启状态下的聆听舒适度,分析AntiShockTM对聆听舒适度的影响。方法 24名无助听器佩带经验的感音神经性听力损失患者双耳选配助听器,分别在AntiShockTM关闭和开启状态下评估其聆听舒适度。结果①在言语输出强度为55 dB SPL时,受试者将AntiShockTM对聆听舒适度的帮助作用选择为"有部分帮助"或更佳级别的概率与机会值(50%)无显著区别,在言语输出强度为70 dBSPL条件下,受试者将AntiShockTM对聆听舒适度的帮助作用选择为"有部分帮助"或更佳级别的概率显著高于机会值。②在全部聆听条件下,认为AntiShockTM开启对聆听舒适度没有帮助、有部分帮助、有帮助以及非常有帮助的受试者比例分别为35.91%1、9.83%、31.47%以及12.78%。③在言语混合瞬态噪声条件下,认为AntiShockTM开启对聆听舒适度没有帮助、有部分帮助、有帮助以及非常有帮助的受试者比例分别为34.42%、19.33%、33.29%以及13.02%。④在言语、环境噪声混合瞬态噪声条件下,认为AntiShockTM开启对聆听舒适度没有帮助、有部分帮助、有帮助以及非常有帮助的受试者比例分别为37.67%、20.42%、29.30%以及12.56%。结论在本实验室评估环境下,AntiShockTM有助于改善聆听舒适度。 Objective A current technology for detecting and controlling transient noises in hearing aids(AntiShockTM) was evaluated regarding its effects on the listening comfort..Methods Twenty-four subjects with sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study.In a single-blinded paradigm,the subjects were asked to rate benefits of listening comfort to listen to mandarin speech under the conditions of the on and off of the AntiShockTM.Results ①Statistics showed that odds of rating "somewhat helpful" or better was not significantly higher than chance level for speech intensity at 55 dB SPL.However,significant odds of rating "somewhat helpful" or better were obtained for the speech intensity of 70 dB SPL.②Under all the listening conditions,the AntiShockTM was ranked as not helpful at all,somewhat helpful,helpful and very helpful at 35.9%,19.8%,31.5% and 12.8%,respectively.③Under the listening conditions of speech and transient,the AntiShockTM was ranked as not helpful at all,somewhat helpful,helpful and very helpful at 34.4%,19.3%,33.3% and 13.0%,respectively.④Under the listening condition of speech,environmental noise and transient,the AntiShockTM was ranked as not helpful at all,somewhat helpful,helpful and very helpful at 37.7%,20.4%,29.3% and 12.6%,respectively.Conclusion The majority of thesubjects noted the algorithm to "helpful" in laboratory evaluation.
出处 《听力学及言语疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期157-160,共4页 Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30772408) (81070784) 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划(2008BAI50B01)联合资助
关键词 助听器 听力损失 噪声抑制 Hearing aid Hearing loss Noise reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Hellstrom PA,Dengerink HA.Axelsson A.Noise levels from toys and recreational articles for children and teenagers[J].Br J Audiol,1992,26:267.
  • 2Palmer CV,Bentler RA,Mueller HG.Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aver-sive sound[J].Trends Amplif,2006,10:95.
  • 3Mueller HG,Ricketts TA.Digital noise reduction[J].Hear J,2005,58:10.
  • 4Bentler RA.Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids:A systematic review of the evidence[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2005,16:473.
  • 5Bentler RA,Chiou LK.Digital noise reduction:An overview[J].Trends Amplif,2006,10:67.
  • 6Boymans M,Dreschler WA.Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone direc-tionality[J].Audiology,2000,39:260.
  • 7Cord MT,Surr RK,Walden BE,et al.Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2002,13:295.
  • 8Surr R,Walden B,Cord M,et al.Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference[J],J Am Acad Audiol,2002,13:308.
  • 9Ricketts T,Henry P,Gnewikow D.Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids[J].Ear Hear,2003,24:424.
  • 10Mueller HG,Weber J,Hornsby BWY.The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise[J].Trends Amplif,2006,10:83.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部