期刊文献+

瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚或咪唑安定在无痛纤维胆道镜下胆管扩张术中的应用 被引量:10

The application of remifentanil-propofol and remifentanil -midazolam analgesia forcholedochofiberscopic dilatation of bile duct
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚或咪唑安定用于纤维胆道镜下胆管球囊扩张术的镇痛镇静的安全性和有效性。方法回顾接受无痛纤维胆道镜下胆管球囊扩张术的患者95例,其中行瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚(PR组)输注43例,行瑞芬太尼复合咪唑安定(MR组)输注52例。记录两组患者给药前及给药后心率(HR)、血压(MAP)、呼吸频率(RR)和血氧饱和度(SPO2)的变化,记录给药后的镇静程度和镇痛效果,记录术后患者的记忆情况,以及患者围术期不良反应的发生情况。结果与基础值比较,PR组给药后10min及20min时HR增加,20min时MAP升高;MR组给药后20min时HR增加(P〈0.05)。与PR组比较,MR组MAP在给药20min时降低(P〈0.05)。两组镇痛效果相似(P〉0.05),改良OAA/S评分在3—4分者MR组(67%)多于PR组(28%,P〈0.01),MR组对操作记忆少,无局部注射痛,患者满意度高(P〈0.05)。结论瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚或咪唑安定均可以安全的用于纤维胆道镜下胆管球囊扩张术。瑞芬太尼复合咪唑安定血流动力学稳定,顺行性遗忘作用强,镇静时间适中,不良反应少。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of remifentanil-propofol and remifentanil- midazolam analgesia for choledochofiberscopie dilatation of bile duct. Methods 95 patients undergoing choledochofiberseopic dilatation of bile duct were reviewed, 43 of which were dealt with remifentanil-propofol (PR) and 52 with remifentanil-midazolam (MR). After medication, changes of HR, MAP, RR and SPO2 were observed. The effects of sedation and analgesia, the instance of amnesia, and side effects were recorded. Results HR in group PR and MR were increase at 10 to 20 min and 20 rain respectively after medication. MAP in group PR was increased at 20 rain, which were decreased in group MR ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Compared with group PR, group MR achieved similar analgesia ( P 〉 0.05 ) , more moderate sedation with modified OAA/S score of 3 -4 (67% vs 28%, P 〈 0. 01 ), less memory, less injection pain, and higher satisfaction (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Both remifentanil-propofol and remifentanil-midazolam can provide safe and effective sedation and analgesia for choledochofiberscopic dilatation of bile duct. Remifentanil- midazolam provides more stable hemodynamics, more amnesia, moderate sedation duration and less side effects.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期626-629,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 瑞芬太尼 丙泊酚 咪唑安定 纤维胆道镜 Remifentanil Propofol Midazolam Choledochofiberscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1冯秋实.微创外科时代继发性胆总管结石的处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(1):50-52. 被引量:44
  • 2曾莉,吴新民.丙泊酚复合咪唑安定和/或芬太尼在胆道镜操作过程中的镇静作用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2010,26(1):19-20. 被引量:11
  • 3Cohen LB, DeLegge MH, Aisenberg J, et al. AGA Institute Review of Endoscopic Sedation. Gastroenterology, 2007, 133 : 675-701.
  • 4田斌斌,顾卫华,施桂珍,张培红.丙泊酚复合氧化亚氮麻醉用于人工流产术的效果观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2003,19(8):504-504. 被引量:35
  • 5A kcaboy ZN, Akcaboy EY, Albayrak D, et al. Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2006, 50: 736-741.
  • 6Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001, 53 : 620-627.
  • 7el-Bitar N, Sfeir S. Evaluation of remifentanil in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2006, 18: 1209-1216.
  • 8Nieuwenhuijs D, Olofsen E, Romberg R, et al. Response surface modeling of remifentanil-propofol interaction on cardio-respiratory control and bispectral index. Anesthesiology, 2003, 98: 312-322.
  • 9Toklu S, Iyilikci L, Gonen C, et al. Comparison of etomidate-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil sedation in patients scheduled for colonoscopy. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2009, 26 : 370-376.
  • 10Moerman AT, Herregods LL, De Vos MM, et al. Manual versus target-controlled infusion remifentanil administration in spontaneously breathing patients. Anesth Analg, 2009, 108: 828-834.

二级参考文献13

  • 1王永光,裘法祖,杜如昱.腹部外科中的微创技术及其发展[J].腹部外科,2005,18(1):15-16. 被引量:19
  • 2刘金钢,赵海鹰.术中胆道镜经胆囊管行胆道探查的临床应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(6):337-338. 被引量:24
  • 3陈亚进,商昌珍,徐国权,刘璐,陈积圣.腹腔镜联合内镜技术治疗胆囊结石合并胆管结石的临床研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(4):290-292. 被引量:35
  • 4Berggren L, Eriksson I, Mollenhoh P, et al. Sedation for fibreoptic gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam. Br J Anaesth, 1983, 55:289-296.
  • 5Seifert H, Schmitt TH, Gultekin T, et al. Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2000, 14:1207-1214.
  • 6Wehrmann T, Grotkamp J, Stergiou N, et al. Electroencephalogram monitoring facilitates sedation with propofol for rouline ERCP: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002, 56:817-824.
  • 7Gasparovic S, Rustemovic N, Opacic M, et al. Comparison of colonoscopies performed under sedation with propofol or with madazolam or without saedation. Acta Med Austriaca, 2003, 30: 13-16.
  • 8Wehrmann T, Kokabpick S, Lembeke B, et al. Efficacy and safety of intraveneous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study. Gastrointesl Endosc, 1999, 49:677-683.
  • 9Disma N, Astuto M, Rizzo G, et al. Propofol sedation with fentanly or midazolam during oesophagogastroduodenoseopy in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2005, 22:848-852.
  • 10刘树清,陈书忠,吴云光,余明豪.腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆管结石160例[J].世界华人消化杂志,2007,15(25):2734-2736. 被引量:11

共引文献87

同被引文献68

引证文献10

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部