期刊文献+

相似任务经验和未来时间充裕感对计划失误的影响 被引量:2

Effects of Similar Task Experience and Time Slack on Planning Fallacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究检验了人们一种潜在的认知倾向,即低估任务的完成时间。本研究分为2个实验,从两个角度来研究人们低估任务时间的行为。实验一从不同预测方式的角度,检验了任务的相似性和认知需求因素对任务时间估计的影响。实验二从未来时间知觉的角度,检验了未来时间充裕感对任务的完成时间预测的影响。结果表明:不同的时间预测方式都会引起对任务完成/持续时间的低估;任务的相似性会利于任务时间估计的精确性;认知需求因素会和任务的相似性产生交互作用,从而影响任务完成时间的估计;未来时间充裕感的程度也会影响人们对当前任务的预测。 People tend to underestimate the time they use in completing a task. Two experiments were designed to uncover the cognitive processes underlying this phenomenon. Experiment 1 tested whether previous experience of similar tasks and NFC (need for cognition) might influence subjects" estimation of task duration/completion time. Experiment 2 tested whether time slack influenced the estimation of task duration/ completing time. Results showed that participants un-derestimated the task duration/completion time both in future and past time estimating. When the task was more similar with previous experience, participants" predictions of task duration were more accurate. There was an interaction between NFC and task similarity in time estimation. Time slack also had effects on the estimation of present task duration.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2010年第4期323-331,共9页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 教育部博士点基金项目(J20100014)资助
关键词 任务相似性 估计方式 时间充裕感 认知需求 similar task experience, approach totime estimation, time slack, NFC
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1邝怡,施俊琦,蔡雅琦,王垒.大学生认知需求量表的修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(1):57-60. 被引量:51
  • 2Block, R. A., Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective durations judgments: A metaanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 184-197.
  • 3Buehler, R., Griffin, D. (2005). Biases and fallacies, memories and predictions: Comment on Roy, Christenfeld and McKenzie (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131,757-760.
  • 4Buehler, R. , Griffin, D. , Ross, M. (1994) . Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,366-381.
  • 5Burt, C. D. B. , Kemp, S. (1991). Retrospective duration estimation of public events. Memory & Cognition, 19,252-262.
  • 6Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 1-36.
  • 7Kahneman, D. , Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in Management Sciences, 12,313-327.
  • 8Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1982). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. In D. KahnemanP. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, (pp.414-421).
  • 9Roy, M. M. , Christenfeld, N. J. S. , MeKenzie, C. R. M. (2005). Underestimating the duration of future events: Memory incorrectly used or memory bias?Psychological Bulletin, 131,738-756.
  • 10Zauberman, G., & Lynch, slack and propensity to J. G. (2005). Resource discount delayed investments of time versus money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 23-37.

二级参考文献16

  • 1安妮·安娜斯塔西 苏珊娜·厄比纳.心理测验[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1998.159-160.
  • 2Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Kao CF.The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition Journal of Personality Assessment 1984, 48 (3): 306-307.
  • 3Cacioppo JT, Petty RE.The Need For Cognition Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42 (1):116-131.
  • 4Koch C, Hayworth E.Examining the Relationship Between Need for Cognition and the Muller-Lyer Illusion North American Journal of Psychology, 2003, 5 (2): 249-256.
  • 5Gulgoz S. Need for Cognition and Cognitive Performance From a Cross-Cultural Perspective: Examples of Academic Success and Solving Anagrams The Journal of Psychology, 2001, 135(1): 100-112.
  • 6Cacioppo Jr, Petty RE, Feinstein .IA, et al. Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals Varying in Need for Cognition Psychological Bulletin, 1996, 119 (2): 197-253.
  • 7Areni CS, Ferrell ME,Wilcox JB. The Persuasive Impact of Reported Group Opinions on Individuals Low vs High in Need for Cognition: Rationalization vs Biased Elaboration? Psychology & Marketing, 2000, 17 (10): 855-862.
  • 8Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, et al. Individual Differences in Intuitive-Experiential and Analytical-Rational Thinking Styles Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71 (2): 390-405.
  • 9Sadowski C J, Cogburn HE.Need for Cognition in the Big-Five Factor Structure The Journal of Psychology,1997, 131 (3): 307-312.
  • 10Evans C J, Kirby JR, Fabrigar LR.Approaches to Learning,Need for Cognition, and Strategic Flexibility Among University Students British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 73: 507-528.

共引文献50

同被引文献33

  • 1杨治良,李朝旭.局中人和局外人的决策差异研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1282-1287. 被引量:20
  • 2黄希庭.未来时间的心理结构[J].心理学报,1994,26(2):121-127. 被引量:65
  • 3张永红,黄希庭.公众时间回溯式记忆的特点[J].心理科学,2005,28(4):775-779. 被引量:4
  • 4Hardesty D M, Carlson J P, Bearden W. Brand familiarity and invoice price effects on consumer evaluations: the moderating role of skepticism toward advertisingiJ].Journal of Advertising, 2002,31 (2): 1 - 15.
  • 5Campbell M C, Keller K L. Brand familiari- ty and advertising repetition effects [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2003, 30(2): 292-304.
  • 6Lafferty B A, Edmondson D R. Portraying the cause instead of the brand in cause-related marketing ads: does it really matter? [J]. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2009, 17(2): 129-144.
  • 7Kent R J, Allen C T. Competitive interfer- ence effects in consumer memory for advertising: the role of brand familiarity [J]. The Journal of Market- ing, 1994: 97-105.
  • 8Rieskamp J, Hoffrage U. Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection [J]. Acta psychologica, 2008, 127 (2): 258-276.
  • 9Ha H Y, Perks H. Effects of consumer per- ceptions of brand experience on the web: Brand fa- miliarity, satisfaction and brand trust [J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2005, 4(6): 438-452.
  • 10Bearden W O, Etzel M J. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions [J]. Journal of consumer research, 1982: 183-194.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部