期刊文献+

论民族国家的生存方式与比较教育和国际教育研究模式 被引量:5

Nation-state's Beings and Models of International and Comparative Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 民族国家是当代世界最基本的组织形态,是国际关系的基本主体,而比较教育和国际教育又是以民族国家为基本单元开展研究的。本文着重指出了国际教育的双重性,并重点探讨了民族国家的生存方式如何决定或影响着比较教育和国际教育研究模式,最后强调民族国家对于比较教育和国际教育的重要性。 Nation-state is the most basic organizational style in the contemporary world and the subject of international relations, which is therefore the basic unit for conducting the international and comparative education research. The article points out the duality of international education,focusing on the exploration of how the nation-state beings determine or impact on the models of international and comparative education
作者 朱旭东
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期1-6,共6页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 民族国家 生存方式 比较教育 国际教育 nation-state being international and comparative education
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[德]沃尔夫冈·布列钦卡.教育科学的基本概念[M].胡劲松,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.54.
  • 2马蕾.“二战”后西方国际教育思想研究[D],北京师范大学博士论文,2010,7,38.
  • 3Tewksbury,D. G.(1944).IntemationalEdueation as a Foundations Discipline. History of Education Journal, 1 ( 1 ), 21-24.
  • 4Scanlon, D. G. (1960). International Education: A Documentary' History. New York:Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University. p. 1.
  • 5Butts, R. F. (1971). International Education: Overview. In L. C. Deighton (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 164 - 171). New York: The Macmillan Company & The Free Press, p. 165.
  • 6Wright,Q. (1955).The Study of International Relations. New York : Appleton Century Crofts. p. 307.
  • 7辞源修订组商务印书馆编辑部.辞源[Z].北京:商务印书馆,1984.573,3294.
  • 8Inter-. (2008). In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary [ EB/OL]. http ://www. merriam-webster, corn/dictionary/ inter-, 2009 -06-14.
  • 9Room, A. (1999). The Cassell Dictionary of Word Histories. London: Cassell. p. 315.International. (2008).In- Merriam-WebsterOnlineDictionary [EB/OL]. http ://www. merriam-webster.com/dictionary/international, 2009-06- 14.
  • 10Fraser, S. E. (1967). Chapter V: International and Comparative Education. Review of Educational Research, 37 ( 1 ), 57-73.

共引文献5

同被引文献60

  • 1赵荷花.谁使我们成为教师——论教师身份之特性[J].教育研究与实验,2010(4):56-60. 被引量:6
  • 2曲正伟.教师的“身份”与“身份认同”[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(04A):34-38. 被引量:84
  • 3刘康.从区域研究到文化研究:人文社科学术范式转换[J].文艺研究,2007(6):12-20. 被引量:16
  • 4安迪·格林.教育与国家形成:英、法、美教育体系起源之比较[M].王春华,等译.北京:教育科学出版社,2004.337.
  • 5Arnold Anderson.Comparative Education Over a Quarter Century:Maturity and Challenges [J]. Comparative Education Review, 1977,21(2-3) :405-416.
  • 6Max Eckstein.The Comparative Mind [J].Comparative Education Review, 1983,27 (3):311- 322.
  • 7Goldschmidt P., Eyermann T. S.. International Educational Performance of the United States:Is There a Problem that Money Can Fix? [J ].Comparative Education, 1999,35 ( 1 ) : 27-43.
  • 8Joe Tin-Yao Lo.The Junior Secondary History Curricula in Hung Kong and Shanghai :A Com- parative Study [ J ].Comparative Education, 2004,40 ( 3 ) : 343-361.
  • 9Noel F. Mc Ginn.Education, Democratization, and Globalization :A Challenge for Comparative Education [J ].Comparative Education Review, 1996,40 (4) : 341-357.
  • 10Dale,R. and Robertson,S.. The Varying Effects of Regional Organizations as Subjects of Globalization of Education [ J ].Comparative Education Review, 2002,46 ( 1 ) : 37-66.

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部