期刊文献+

Finding Data Tractable Description Logics for Computing a Minimum Cost Diagnosis Based on ABox Decomposition

Finding Data Tractable Description Logics for Computing a Minimum Cost Diagnosis Based on ABox Decomposition
原文传递
导出
摘要 Ontology diagnosis, a well-known approach for handling inconsistencies in a description logic (DL) based ontology, computes a diagnosis of the ontology, i.e., a minimal subset of axioms in the ontology whose removal restores consistency. However, ontology diagnosis is computationally hard, especially computing a minimum cost diagnosis (MCD) which is a diagnosis such that the sum of the removal costs attached to its axioms is minimized. This paper addresses this problem by finding data tractable DLs for computing an MCD which allow computing an MCD in time polynomial in the size of the ABox of a given ontology. ABox decomposition is used to find a sufficient and necessary condition to identify data tractable DLs for computing an MCD under the unique name assumption (UNA) among all fragments of that are at least as expressive as without inverse roles. The most expressive, data tractable DL identified is without inverse roles or qualified existential restrictions. Ontology diagnosis, a well-known approach for handling inconsistencies in a description logic (DL) based ontology, computes a diagnosis of the ontology, i.e., a minimal subset of axioms in the ontology whose removal restores consistency. However, ontology diagnosis is computationally hard, especially computing a minimum cost diagnosis (MCD) which is a diagnosis such that the sum of the removal costs attached to its axioms is minimized. This paper addresses this problem by finding data tractable DLs for computing an MCD which allow computing an MCD in time polynomial in the size of the ABox of a given ontology. ABox decomposition is used to find a sufficient and necessary condition to identify data tractable DLs for computing an MCD under the unique name assumption (UNA) among all fragments of that are at least as expressive as without inverse roles. The most expressive, data tractable DL identified is without inverse roles or qualified existential restrictions.
出处 《Tsinghua Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CAS 2010年第6期623-632,共10页 清华大学学报(自然科学版(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.61005043 and 60970045)
关键词 ontology diagnosis minimum cost diagnosis description logics data tractability ontology diagnosis minimum cost diagnosis description logics data tractability
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/, 2004.
  • 2Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness D L, et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2003.
  • 3Schlobach S. Diagnosing terminologies. In: Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 2005: 670-675.
  • 4Reiter R. A theory of diagnosis from first principles. ArtificialIntelligence, 1987, 32(1): 57-95.
  • 5Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Sirin E, et al. Repairing unsatlstiable concepts in OWL ontologies. In: Proceeding of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference. Budva, Montenegro, 2006: 170-184.
  • 6Du Jianfeng, Shen Yidong. Computing minimum cost diagnoses to repair populated DL-based ontologies. In: Proceeding of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference. Beijing, China, 2008: 265-274.
  • 7Artale A, Calvanese D, Kontchakov R, et al. The DL-Lite family and relations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2009, 36: 1-69.
  • 8Cadoli M. Two methods for tractable reasoning in artificial intelligence: Language restriction and theory approximation [Dissertation]. Universita degli studi di Roma La Sapienza, Italy, 1993.
  • 9Pan J Z, Thomas E. Approximating OWL-DL ontologies. In: Proceeding of the 22nd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2007: 1434-1439.
  • 10Horrocks I, Sattler U, Tobies S. Practical reasoning for very expressive description logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 2000, 8(3): 239-263.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部