期刊文献+

一种系统化的行为形成因子分类方法 被引量:16

A Systematic Taxonomy for Performance Shaping Factor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了准确表述能够诱发人为差错的情景环境,对人因可靠性分析(HRA)中的行为形成因子(PSF)进行归纳整理,构建一种新的系统化的PSF分类方法。对现有人因可靠性文献中的PSF进行分析,明确PSF的定义及其内涵。通过分析人机交互过程,指出PSF应该包含:操作者,机器,任务,组织,环境和辅助系统等6个方面,分别从上述6个方面对PSF进行细致分解,最终构建包括6个方面38个元素的PSF分类方法。 In order to accurately describe the scenario that can induce human error,PSF in HRA is collected,and a new systematic taxonomy for PSF is constructed.PSF in existing literatures is analyzed,and the definition and connotation of PSF is specified.According to the analysis of human-machine interaction process,it is pointed that PSF should include six aspects,which are operator,machine,task,organization,environment and assisting devices.As to each of the six aspects,PSF is decomposed in details respectively,and the new systematic taxonomy for PSF is constructed ultimately,which includes thirty-eight items from six aspects.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期20-25,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 行为形成因子(PSF) 人因可靠性分析(HRA) 人为差错 人机交互 人因 performance shaping factor(PSF) human reliability analysis(HRA) human error human machine interaction human factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Swain A D, Guttmann H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications[R]. NUREG/CR-1278. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.
  • 2Kim J W, Jung W D. A taxonomy of perfurmance influence factors for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2003, 16(1): 479-495.
  • 3Williams J C. A databased method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance[A]. IEEE 4^th Conference on ttuman Factor and Power Plants[C]. Monterey, California: 1988:436-453.
  • 4Vaurio J K. Human factors, human reliability and risk assessment in license renewal of a nuclear power plant[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94(11) : 1818-1826.
  • 5Fabiano B, Curro F, Reverberi A P, et al. Port safety and the container revolution: A statistical study on human factor and occupational accidents over the long period[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(8): 980-990.
  • 6Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM)E MJ. London: Elsevier Science Ltd. , 1998.
  • 7Chang Y H, Wang Y C. Signifieant human risk factors in aircraft maintenance technicians[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(1) :54-62.
  • 8Swain A D. Accident sequence evaluation program human reliability analysis procedure[R]. NUREG/CR-4772. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987.
  • 9Hanaman G W, Spurgin A J, l,ukic Y. Human cognitive reliability model for PRA analysis[R]. NUS-4531.Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute, 1984.
  • 10Barriere M. Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a techniques for human event analysis (ATHEANA)[R]. N UREG-1624. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2000.

二级参考文献49

共引文献36

同被引文献150

引证文献16

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部