摘要
根据有关的数据资料,基于全国和甘肃的模拟分析,对低保政策、农村扶贫开发政策与负所得税在五个方面进行测算与比较。从模拟分析的结果来看,与最低生活保障制度和扶贫开发相比,负所得税尽管在花费资金方面较多,但是具有覆盖人数多、调节收入差距明显、税率可以灵活调整、年标准线明显高于低保线(或绝对贫困线)等优势。
On the basis of the data information and the simulation analysis of China and Gansu Province the paper makes a calculation and comparison of the urban and rural lowest cost-of-living system,rural poverty alleviation and development policies and negative income tax in five aspects.The result shows that the negative Income tax is obviously superior to the lowest cost-of-living system and poverty alleviation and development policies in coverage, income adjustment,tax rate adjustment regulation and annual standard line(absolute poverty line) in spite of the relatively higher cost.
出处
《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期79-87,共9页
Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金(09XJL012)
2010年度全国党校系统重点调研课题"用负所得税调节我国收入分配差距研究"
关键词
负所得税
最低生活保障制度
扶贫开发
甘肃省
negative income tax
the subsistence allowances system
poverty alleviation development
Gansu Province