期刊文献+

意义阐释分歧的实证研究——以法律语言学为视角 被引量:1

An Empirical Study on the Divergence in Meaning Interpretation——A Survey from the View of Forensic Linguistics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 意义阐释模式经历了从一元化模式到多元化模式,再到后现代的解构化模式的变化历程,意义的客观性逐步走向衰弱,这与其说是人们关于意义问题的立场变化,不如说是人们关于意义问题的认识更加接近实际。客观性在法律领域具有独特的价值,法律领域要保证科学意义上的客观性,却存在着应然层面的客观需求与实然层面的实际分歧之间的紧张。 With the meaning interpretation model having developed from the monistic to the pluralistic, and then to the post - modern deconstructionalized, people's understanding of meaning has become deeper. However, the objectivity of meaning has been gradually weakened. It is not so such that the people's standpoint has been changed as that people's understanding of meaning has been closer to the reality. Since such objectivity in scientific meaning does have the special value in legal field, then how can we guarantee its realization? If it cannot be achieved, how can the divergence between ideal objectivity and actual objectivity be eliminated?
作者 潘黎萍
出处 《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期41-46,共6页 Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 意义 意义阐释 客观性 法律语言 法律解释 meaning meaning interpretation objectivity forensic linguistics legal explanation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1弗雷格.论涵义和指称[G]//涂纪亮.语言哲学名著选辑.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1988.
  • 2拉伦兹 陈爱娥 译.法学方法论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.20.
  • 3哈特 张文显译.法律的概念[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.14.
  • 4戴雪.英宪精义[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001..
  • 5波斯纳.法理学问题[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002..
  • 6Bibi. Criminal Appeal Reports [ J ]. sentence, 1980, ( 2 ).

共引文献229

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部