期刊文献+

曲线梁独塔斜拉桥的抗震分析模型探讨 被引量:2

Discussion on Finite Element Models for Seismic Analysis of a Curved Cable-Stayed Bridge with Single Pylon
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以东平水道大桥为工程背景,比较了按弯梁原始线形建立的曲梁模型和按以直代弯方式建立的直梁模型在结构动力特性、地震响应等方面的差异,讨论斜拉弯桥有限元简化建模的可能性,并通过改变主梁的弯曲圆心角探讨直梁模型的适用性。分析表明,采用以直代弯建模对结构的主要振型周期、模态和质量参与系数不会产生明显误差;非线性时程分析结果也肯定了直梁模型的数值精度;主梁弯曲圆心角的增大则会削弱直梁模型的适用性。误差分析结果显示,直梁建模方式对一般桥梁结构的抗震设计具有足够的可信度。 Based on the Dongping Channel Bridge,two finite element models(FEMs) were established,i.e.a straight model neglecting the spatial shape of the curved deck and using straight geometry instead,and a curved model according to the original shape of the deck.Comparison between these two FEMs in both structural dynamical characteristics and seismic response was conducted to discuss the possibility of simplifying the seismic analytical model.Furthermore,applicability of the straight model was assessed through varying the central angle of the curved deck.The results show that the straight model will not cause unacceptable errors in main periods,mode characteristics and modal participating mass ratios.The time history analytical results obtained from the straight model are proved to be credible.Increase in the central angle will impair the applicability of the straight model.Error analysis tells that the straight model is sufficiently accurate in seismic analysis and can be applied in the practical seismic bridge design.
出处 《结构工程师》 2011年第1期98-104,共7页 Structural Engineers
关键词 斜拉弯桥 有限元模型 动力特性 地震响应 比较分析 curved cable-stayed bridge FEM dynamic characteristics seismic response comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Virlogeux M. Recent evolution of cable-stayed bridges [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 1999,21 : 737-755.
  • 2Deger Y,Cantieni R, de Smet C A M, et al. Finite element model optimization of the new Rhine Bridge based on ambient vibration testing [ C ]//Proceedings of Eurodyn ' 96,1996:817-822.
  • 3Dionysius M Siringoringo, Yozo Fujino. Dynamics characteristics of a curved cable-stayed bridge identifiedfrom strong motion records [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2007,29:2001-2017.
  • 4Brownjohn J M W, Lee J, Cheong B. Dynamic performance of a curved cable-stayed bridge [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 1999,21 : 1015-1027.
  • 5范立础.桥梁抗震[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2001..
  • 6彭雪林,任伟新,葛继平.大跨度斜拉桥的建模与模态分析[J].结构工程师,2003(z1):414-417. 被引量:3
  • 7李国豪.桥梁结构稳定与振动[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2002.287-344.
  • 8聂利英,李建中,范立础.复杂结构地震动输入方向的基本原理及其影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(3):30-34. 被引量:17
  • 9Menun C, Kiureghian A D. A replacement for the 30%, 40% and SRSS rules for muhicomponentseismic analysis [ J ]. Earthquake Spectra, 1998, 14 (1) :153-163.
  • 10Oscar A L6pez, Ronald Torres. The critical angle of seismic incidence and the maximum structural response [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1997,26(9) :881-894.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Fan Lichu, Seismic Design of Highway Bridge[ M ]. Huajie International Publishing Co. Limited, Hong Kong, 1997.
  • 2E. L. Wilson et al. Three - dimension Dynamic Analysis for Multi - component Earthquake Spectra [ J ]. EESD, 1982 ; 10:471 - 476.
  • 3OSCAR A. LOPEZ et. The critical angle of seismic incidence and the maximum structural response[J]. EESD ,1997, VOL 26 ,881 -894.
  • 4冯云田,李明瑞,林春哲.复杂结构的弹性地震反应分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,1991,11(4):77-86. 被引量:29

共引文献206

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部