期刊文献+

基于时间间隔的连续并购行为分析 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 以2000-2007年我国812家A股上市公司的2424次并购事件为样本,运用生存分析中的Cox比例风险模型,分析连续并购的时间间隔特征及其影响因素。研究结果表明:相邻两次并购的时间间隔随着并购次序的上升逐渐下降,说明随着并购次序的上升,管理层的并购经验越丰富,会倾向于更频繁的并购;同时,公司独立董事的比例与并购时间间隔显著正相关,第一大股东的持股比例与并购时间间隔显著负相关。说明独立董事制度会使管理层的并购行为更加谨慎,而一股独大的公司资本结构则会加速并购进程。
出处 《西北工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第1期28-31,43,共5页 Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University(Social Sciences)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Schipper, Thompson. The impact of merger-related regula- tions using exact distributions of test statistics [J].Joumal of Accounting Research,1983, 21(1).
  • 2Loderer ,Martin. Corporate acquisitions by listed firms: The experience of a comprehensive sample [J]. Financial Man- agement,1990, (19): 17-31.
  • 3Rovit, Lemire. Your best M&A strategy:Smart deal makers methodically acquire through good times and bad[J].Harvard Business Review,2003.
  • 4Fuller, Netter, Stegemoller. What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisi- tions[J]. Journal of Finance,2002, (57): 1763-1793.
  • 5Asquith. Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholder returns [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1983, ( 11 ): 51-83.
  • 6冯根福,吴林江.我国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究[J].经济研究,2001,36(1):54-61. 被引量:774
  • 7Malmendier, Tate. Does overconfidence affect corporate in- vestment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited[J]. Euro- pean Financial Management,2005, (11): 649-659.
  • 8Billett, M. T.,Qian, Y. Are Overconfident Managers Born or Made?Evidence of Self-Attribution Bias from Frequent Ac-quirers [J]. Management Science,2005, Accepted Paper Se- ties.
  • 9Fowler, Sehmidt. Determinants of tender offer post-acquisi- tion financial performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, (10): 339-350.
  • 10Ismail. Will Multiple Aequirers ever Learn? The US Evi- dence from Single Versus Multiple Acquirers. Working Pa- per (American University of Beirut). 2005.

二级参考文献9

共引文献773

同被引文献45

  • 1李善民,朱滔.管理者动机与并购绩效关系研究[J].经济管理,2005,31(4):4-12. 被引量:32
  • 2韩立岩,陈庆勇.并购的频繁程度意味着什么——来自我国上市公司并购绩效的证据[J].经济学(季刊),2007,6(4):1185-1200. 被引量:54
  • 3Finkelstein S.,Haleblian J.Understanding Acquisition Performance:The Role of Transfer Effects[J].Organization Science,2002,13(1):36-47.
  • 4Haleblian J.,Devers C.E.,Mcnamara G.,Carpenter M.A.,Davison R.B.Taking Stock of What We Know about Mergers and Acquisitions:A Review And Research Agenda[J].Journal of Management,2009,35(3):469-502.
  • 5Hayward M.L.When Do Firms Learn From Their Acquisition Experience? Evidence from 1990-1995[J].Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(1):21-39.
  • 6Zollom M.Superstitious Learning with Rare Strategic Decisions:Theory And Evidence From Corporate Acquisitions[J].Organization Science,2009,20(5):894-908.
  • 7Barkema H.G.,Schijven M.Toward Unlocking the Full Potential of Acquisitions:The Role of Organizational Restructuring[J].Academy of Management Journal,2008,51(4):696-722.
  • 8Benkard C.L.Learning and Forgetting:The Dynamics of Aircraft Production[J].American Economic Review,2000,90(4):1034-1054.
  • 9Huan Z.,Ghauri P.N.Learning through International Acquisitions:the Process of Knowledge Acquisition in China[J].Management International Review,2008,48(2):207-226.
  • 10Tucker A.L.,Edmondson A.C.Why Hospitals Don't Learn from Failures:Organizational and Psychological Dynamics that Inhibit System Change[J].California Management Review,2003,45(2):55-72.

引证文献2

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部