期刊文献+

基于Hotelling模型的双寡头市场定价博弈分析 被引量:1

A Pricing Game Analysis Based on Hotelling Model in Duopoly Market Fuzhou University
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章在三阶段Hotelling模型的基础上研究了双寡头市场的定价博弈问题。在第一阶段两个寡头企业同时选择价格策略;在第二阶段两寡头企业确定价格大小及相应的定价概率;在第三阶段由消费者选择企业。由博弈分析的结果得出,使用高价和打折相互结合的"混合策略"为双寡头市场定价博弈的唯一纳什均衡策略,此时博弈双方获得最大利润,即高低价混合策略才是理论推导的最佳策略。文章在最后还从正反两方面给出了这个结论实证上的支持。 Using a three - stage Hotelling model, we study the problem of price strategies in duopoly market. The duopoly enterprises simultaneously choose their price strategies in the first stage. In the second stage, two firms determine the optimal price and the probability of former price they chose. In the third stage, consumers will finally decide one of the two firms which they purchase from. According to the game theory, we find that the only Nash equilibrium strategy of this problem is mixed strategy. By this way, the two monopolist get the maximum profits. At the last of our article, we provide two instances to support our conclusion.
机构地区 福州大学
出处 《郑州航空工业管理学院学报》 2011年第2期122-127,共6页 Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics
基金 福州大学科技发展基金项目(09SKQ04)
关键词 双寡头市场 定价策略 博弈分析 duopoly market price strategy game analysis
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献23

  • 1HOTELLING H.Stability in competition [J].Economic Journal, 1929,39(153):41-75.
  • 2ASPREMONT C D.,Gabszewicz C J,Thisse J EOn Hotelling's Stability in Competition[J].Econometrica~ 1979,47:1145-1151.
  • 3JEHIE EProduct Differentiation and Price Collusion[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1992(10):633-641.
  • 4王则柯 梁美灵.价格与市场[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1994..
  • 5蒋青,刘文杰.世界一流管理学名著[M].第2版.乌鲁木齐:新疆人民出版社,2002
  • 6乔治 J 施迪格勒.价格理论[M].李青原,赵慧生,译.北京:商务印书馆,1992.
  • 7王宝钧.中国彩电业的三大预言[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2004.
  • 8张晓霞.中国高层智囊[M].北京:京华出版社,2000.
  • 9Steven E Landburg.价格理论与应用[M].宋纬,黄静,赵惠,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
  • 10汪洋.价格知识问答[M].北京:中国市场出版社,2005.

共引文献38

同被引文献24

  • 1赵德余,顾海英,刘晨.双寡头垄断市场的价格竞争与产品差异化策略——一个博弈论模型及其扩展[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(5):1-7. 被引量:40
  • 2徐兵,朱道立.具有网络外部性的扩展Hotelling模型[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(1):9-17. 被引量:44
  • 3Etzion H, Pang M S. Complementary online services in competitive markets : Maintaining profitability in the presence of net- work effects[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2014, 38(1) : 231 -247.
  • 4Liang W J, Lin Y J, Hwang H. Heterogeneous duopoly, spatially discriminatory pricing, and optimal location[ J]. The An- nals of Regional Science, 2012, 49 ( 3 ) : 845 - 860.
  • 5Matsubayashi N. Price and quality competition: The effect of differentiation and vertical integration[ J]. European Journal ofOperational Research, 2007, 180 ( 2 ) : 907 - 92 I.
  • 6Yue X, Mukhopadhyay S K, Zhu X. A bertrand model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59 (10) : 1182 - 1192.
  • 7Mukhopadhyay S K, Yue X, Zhu X. A stackelberg model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry [ J ]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 134 (2) : 424 - 433.
  • 8Griva K, Vettas N. Price competition in a differentiated products duopoly under network effects [ J ]. Information Economics and Policy, 2011, 23(1) : 85 -97.
  • 9Baake P, Boom A. Vertical product differentiation, network externalities, and compatibility decisions [ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001, 19( 1 ) : 267 -284.
  • 10Zanchettin P. Differentiated duopoly with asymmetric costs[ J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2006, 15 (4) : 999 - 1015.

引证文献1

二级引证文献43

;
使用帮助 返回顶部