期刊文献+

不完全信息条件下象征式竞购合谋的均衡策略分析 被引量:7

Equilibrium Analysis of Complementary Takeover Collusion under Incomplete Information
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究象征式竞购合谋这种典型合谋方式的均衡策略问题。考虑到竞购双方估值信息的不完全,以拍卖理论中的竞标模型为基础,确定了合谋激励条件,求解了合理的利益补偿价值,并在此基础上通过博弈分析得出了竞购合谋的均衡策略,最后分析了目标公司针对竞购双方合谋在保留价格上的响应策略。研究表明,竞购者合谋并未降低收购活动的经济效益,目标公司能够通过设定合理的保留来抑制合谋行为的发生。 This paper deals with the equilibrium strategies on complementary takeover collusion.Considering the incomplete information of the value on the target and based on the bidding model,we manifest the incentive for collusions and resolve the rational interest compensation,and then get the equilibrium collusion strategies.Furthermore,we analyze the response strategies of the target firm's reservation price.It is shown that the bidding collusion does not erode the economic benefit of takeover,and the target firm can restrain from collusion by setting a reasonable reservation price.
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期45-50,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70973096) 国家博士点基金资助项目(20096118110010) 陕西省高校重点学科专项资金建设项目
关键词 象征式竞购合谋 不完全信息 利益补偿价值 保留价格 Complementary Takeover Collusion Incomplete Information Interest Compensation Reservation Price
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Fishman M J. A theory of preemptive takeover bidding [J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1988, 19(1):88-101.
  • 2Hirshleifer D, P'ng I. Facilitation of competing bids and the price of a takeover target [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1989,2 : 587-606.
  • 3Bulow J, Huang M, Klemperer P. Toeholds and takeovers[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1999,107(3):427-454.
  • 4Shapiro C. Theories of oligopolistic behaviour[M]. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 1989,1:329- 414.
  • 5McAfee R P, McMillan J. Bidding rings[J]. The American Economic Review,1992,8(3):579-599.
  • 6Kofman F, Lawarree J. Collusion in hierarchical agency[J]. Econometrica, 1993,61 : 629-656.
  • 7王宏,陈宏民,顾巧明.基于第二价格预拍的竞标者合谋均衡分析[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(3):132-140. 被引量:6
  • 8Graham D A, et al. Collusive bidder behavior at single-object second price and English auctions[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1987, 95 (6): 1217- 1239.

二级参考文献23

  • 1潘泽清,张维.大股东与经营者合谋行为及法律约束措施[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(6):118-122. 被引量:29
  • 2董志强,蒲勇健.公共管理领域监察合谋防范机制[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(3):116-121. 被引量:17
  • 3Feinstein, J. S. , Block, M. K. , Nold, F.D.. Asymmetric information and collusive behavior in auction markets [J]. American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (3):441--460.
  • 4Porter, R. H. , Zona, D. J.. Detection of bid-rigging in procurement auctions [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(3): 518--538.
  • 5Hendricks, K. , Porter, R. H.. An empirical study of an auction with asymmetric information [J. The American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5): 865--883.
  • 6Hendricks, K. , Porter, R. H. , Tan,G.. Bidding rings and the winner's curse [J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2008, 39(4): 1018--1041.
  • 7Porter, R. H. , Zona, D. J.. Ohio school milk markets: An analysis of bidding [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1999, 30(2)I 263--88.
  • 8Pesendorfer, M.. A study of collusion in first-price auctions [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2000, 67 , (3): 381--411.
  • 9Cramton, P. C. , Schwartz, J. A.. Collusive bidding:Lessons from the FCC spectrum auctions [J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2000, 17(3): 229--252.
  • 10Cramton, P. C. , Schwartz, J.A.. Collusive bidding in the FCC spectrum auctions E J2. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2002, 1(1), Article 11.

共引文献5

同被引文献95

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部