期刊文献+

肋间神经阻滞治疗285例开胸手术后疼痛综合征的回顾性分析 被引量:9

Intercostal nerve blockade for management of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome:a retrospective analysis of 285 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析肋间神经阻滞治疗开胸手术后疼痛综合征(PTPS)的效果,并探讨影响疗效的相关因素。方法 选择完成5次肋间神经阻滞治疗的PTPS患者285例,采用疼痛缓解程度评分法,以总疼痛缓解总百分率50%为界分为治疗有效(A)组和治疗无效(B)组,记录两组患者的性别、年龄、术前有无胸背部疼痛、手术部位、术后放化疗、术后情绪、治疗前疼痛持续时间、治疗前疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)等,分析上述因素与疗效的相关性。结果 治疗后患者总疼痛缓解总百分率>50%者占29.5%(84/285)。两组间年龄、术前有胸背痛、手术取右侧胸部切口、治疗后行化疗、治疗前疼痛VAS评分的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。A组治疗后接受胸部放疗和术后情绪低落者的构成比均显著低于B组(P值均<0.05),治疗前疼痛持续时间亦显著短于B组(P<0.05)。性别、手术部位、术后接受胸部放疗、术后情绪低落、治疗前疼痛持续时间与治疗后疼痛缓解程度的总相关性为76.4%,其中治疗前疼痛持续时间的相关性为69.7%。治疗前疼痛持续时间与治疗后疼痛缓解程度呈负相关(r=-0.635,P<0.05)。结论 PTPS的病因主要为直接或间接的肋间神经损伤,影响其疗效的因素涉及整个围术期,早期治疗是提高疗效的关键。 Objective To conduct a retrospective analysis of 285 patients with post-thoracotomy pain syndrome(PTPS)who were treated by intercostal nerve blockade and to explore the factors the affecting efficacy.Methods A total of 285 PTPS patients receiving intercostal nerve block for five times were divided into 2 groups according to total percentage of pain relief(%Max TOTPAR).The patient with a %Max TOTPAR more than 50% were included in group A and those with less than 50% were included in group B.The clinical records including sex,age,preoperative chest or back pain,surgical site,posttreatment radiotherapy and chemotherapy,postoperative mood,preoperative pain status,duration and visual analogue scale(VAS)pain score were reviewed and analyzed,so as to explore the relevance between the curative effects of the treatment and the above mentioned risk factors.Results After treatment 84 patients(29.5%)achieved a %Max TOTPAR more than 50%.There were no significant differences between A and B groups concerning the age,pretreatment chest or back pain status,right surgical site,posttreatment chemotherapy,VAS pain score before treatment(P0.05).The rate of chest radiotherapy before treatment,incidence of postoperative mood,and duration of pain before treatment in group A were significantly lower or shorter than those in group B(P0.05).Multifactor logistic regression showed that the pain relief rate after treatment had a 76.4% correlation with gender,surgical site,posttreatment chest radiotherapy,postoperative mood,and pretreatment duration of pain.The pretreatment duration of pain was significantly correlated with the pain relief after treatment(r =-0.635,P0.05).Logistic regression showed that the pain relief rate after treatment was 69.7% if the pain duration before treatment was less than 10 months.Conclusion Intercostal nerve injury is the main cause of PTPS.The risk factors of PTPS involves the whole perioperative period.Early treatment is crucial for pain relief.
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期90-92,共3页 Shanghai Medical Journal
基金 上海市级医院适宜技术联合开发推广应用项目(SHDC12010222)
关键词 肋间神经阻滞 开胸手术后疼痛综合征 疼痛缓解 Intercostal nerve blockade Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome Pain relief
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl, 1986, 3: S1-S226.
  • 2Wildgaard K, Ravn J, Kehlet H. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain~ a critical review of pathogenic mechanisms and strategies for prevention. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2009, 36 170-180.
  • 3Maguire M F, Latter J A, Mah~an R, et al. A study exploring the role o{ intercostal nerve damage in chronic pain after thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006, 291 873-879.
  • 4Maguire M F, Ravenscroft A, Beggs D, et al. A questionnaire study investigating the prevalence of the neuropathic component of chronic pain after thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006, 29 ~ 800-805.
  • 5Gilron I. Neural blockade in the evaluation and management of chronic pain: an overview. Pain Res Manage, 2000, 5: 93- I00.
  • 6Maguire M F, Latter J A, Maha}an R, et al. A study exploring the role of intercostal nerve damage in chronic pain a{ter thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006, 29~ 873-879.
  • 7Gerner P. Postthoracotomy pain management problems. Anesthesiol Clin, 2008, 26 : 355-367,.
  • 8! De Cosmo G, Aceto P, Gualtieri E, et al. Analgesia i~ / thoracic surgery: review. Minerva Anestesiol, 2009, 75~ / 393-400.
  • 9SearciM, Joshi A, Attia R. In patients undergoing thoracic surgery is paravertebral block as effective as epidural analgesia for pain management? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2010, 10: 92-96.
  • 10Conlon N P, Shaw A D, Grichnik K P. Postthoraeotomy paravertehral analgesia: will it replace epidural analgesia? Anesthesiol Clin, 2008, 26: 369-380,.

二级参考文献1

  • 1Kazunori Yamashita,Makoto Fukusaki,Yuko Ando,Arihiro Fujinaga,Takahiro Tanabe,Yoshiaki Terao,Koji Sumikawa. Preoperative administration of intravenous flurbiprofen axetil reduces postoperative pain for spinal fusion surgery[J] 2006,Journal of Anesthesia(2):92~95

共引文献5

同被引文献74

  • 1秦建军,赵松,赵高峰,胡伟,齐宇,付明倜,程会芳,赵芳.开胸术后冷冻肋间神经镇痛的临床研究[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2006,13(1):25-27. 被引量:17
  • 2吴镜湘,陈明,赵丽丽,梁昌毅,徐美英.胸科手术后舒芬太尼静脉镇痛的剂量探讨[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(1):22-23. 被引量:50
  • 3鞠辉,冯艺.肋间神经冷冻用于开胸术后镇痛[J].中国医刊,2007,42(9):32-34. 被引量:11
  • 4Grider J S, Mullet T W, Saha S P, et al. A randomized, double- blind trial comparing continuous thoracic epidural bupivacaine with and without opioid in contrast to a continuous paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine for postthoracotomy pain. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ,2012,26( 1 ) :83-89.
  • 5De Cosmo G, Aeeto P, Gualtieri E, et al. Analgesia in thoracic surgery:review. Minerva Anestesiol,2009,75 (6) :393-400.
  • 6Wildgaard K, Ravn J, Kehlet H. Chronic post - thoracotomy pain: a critical review of pathogenic mechanisms and strategies for prevention [J].Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2009,36 : 170 - 180.
  • 7Schnabel A, Reich SU, Kranke P, et al. Etficacy and safety of pa- ravertebral blocks in breast surgery; a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2010, 105 (6): 842-852.
  • 8De Cosmo G, Aceto P, Gu AL, et al. Analgesia in thoracic surgery: review [J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2009, 75 (6): 393-400.
  • 9Cowie B, McGlade D, Ivanusic J, et al. Ultrasound-guided tho- racic paravertebral blockade: a cadaveric study [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2010, 110 (6): 1735-1739.
  • 10Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analge- sic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs. epidural blockade for thoracotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J]. Br.l Anaesth. 2006. 96 (4), 418-426.

引证文献9

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部