期刊文献+

基于损失厌恶的Littlewood容量控制准则 被引量:1

Littlewood Capacity Control Rule under Loss-aversion
原文传递
导出
摘要 在传统的航空收益管理单航段两种票价等级的容量控制准则—Littlewood准则容量控制模型基础上考虑有限理性决策中的损失厌恶特性和参照依赖属性,以盈亏均衡点为基点,引入具有损失厌恶特征的效用函数,在Kahneman和Tversky预期理论(Prospect Theory,PT)的框架下,给出单航段两种票价等级的不同损失厌恶程度下高等级座位保护水平的计算公式.理论分析和数值算例均表明,随着损失厌恶程度的增加,在其他条件不变的前提下,高等级座位的保护水平将不断降低. Under the prospect theory which developed by Kahneman and Tversky and by introducing a new utility function which has the loss-aversion characteristics, the Littlewood capacity control rule(the earliest single-resource model for quantity-based revenue management) is considered. Theoretical analysis and numerical examples indicate that the protection level of class 1 will continuously decreased along with the increase of loss aversion degree.
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期80-85,共6页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会与中国民用航空局联合资助(60979010) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(200800070021) 北京市自然科学基金(9102016)
关键词 有限理性 损失厌恶 容量控制 Littlewood准则 bounded rationality loss-aversion capacity control Littlewood rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Littlewood K. Forecasting and control of passenger bookings[C]//Nathanya: 12th AGIFORS Symposium Proceedings, 1972, 12: 95-117.
  • 2Belobaba P P. Air travel demand and airline seat inventory management[D]. Cambridge" Flight Transportation Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1987.
  • 3Belobaba P P. Application of a probabilistic decision model to airline seat inventory control[J]. Operations Research Practice, 1989, 37(2): 183-197.
  • 4Brumelle S L, McGill J I, Oum T H, Sawaki K, Tretheway M W. Allocation of airline seats between stochastically dependent demands[J]. Transportation Science, 1990, 24(3): 183-192.
  • 5Van Ryzin G J, McGill J I. Revenue management without forecasting or optimization: An adaptive algorithm for determining seat protection levels[J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(6): 760-775.
  • 6Xuanmin Su. Bounded Rationality in newsvendor models[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(4), 566-589.
  • 7王虹,周晶.Loss-averse零售商参与的供应链协调机制研究[J].统计与决策,2009,25(3):180-182. 被引量:15
  • 8刘珩,潘景铭,唐小我.基于损失厌恶型零售商的易逝品供应链价格补贴契约研究[J].控制与决策,2010,25(8):1149-1154. 被引量:24
  • 9Kahneman D, Tversky A. A prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-292.
  • 10Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty [J]. Journal of risk Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.

二级参考文献38

共引文献79

同被引文献14

  • 1Zuo‐Jun MaxShen,XuanmingSu.Customer Behavior Modeling in Revenue Management and Auctions: A Review and New Research Opportunities[J].Production and Operations Management.2009(6)
  • 2J. Neil Bearden,Ryan O. Murphy,Amnon Rapoport.Decision Biases in Revenue Management: Some Behavioral Evidence[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management . 2008 (4)
  • 3Irwin P. Levin,Sandra L. Schneider,Gary J. Gaeth.All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes . 1998 (2)
  • 4Kahneman D,Tversky A.Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist . 1984
  • 5Loch, Christoph H.,Wu, Yaozhong.Behavioral operations management. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management . 2005
  • 6Katok,Elena.Using laboratory experiments to build better operations management models. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management . 2012
  • 7Tversky A,Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science . 1981
  • 8Kahneman Daniel,Amos Tversky.Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica . 1979
  • 9Reyna,Valerie F.,Brainerd,Charles J.Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Framing Effects in Choice: Gist Extraction, Truncation, and Conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making . 1991
  • 10Talluri K T,Garrett J Van Ryzin.The theory and practice of revenue management. . 2004

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部