期刊文献+

技术基础科学领域科技创新群体的考核、评价指标和方法研究 被引量:3

Research on Assessment,Evaluation Index and Method for Scientific and Technological Innovation Group in Technical Basic Sciences Field
原文传递
导出
摘要 制定了对技术基础科学领域科技创新群体进行考核的指导原则和方法。结合技术基础科学领域的特征,以成果数量为基础,质量水平为核心,重大效应为重点的原则建立了评价指标体系,运用带有专家可信度的层次分析法确定各指标的权重,构建了能够同时处理科技创新群体评价指标模糊性和灰色性特征的灰色模糊评价模型。最后进行了实证检验和分析,并对评价对象提出了建议。 It formulated the guiding principle and method of assessment to scientific and technological innovation group in the field of technological basic science.Considering technical basic sciences field's characteristic,and according to the principle that the achievement quantity is foundation,the quality level is a core,and the significant effect is a key,the evaluation index system was established.It put expert reliability into AHP method to decide the importance of each index,and proposed grey and fuzzy evaluation model that can process simultaneously fuzziness and grey characteristic of the evaluation index.Finally,empirical test and analysis was carried on,and the suggestion was given for the object of evaluation.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期159-164,共6页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-07-0241) 国家自然科学基金项目(60940005 71073039)
关键词 技术基础科学 科技创新群体 考核 评价指标体系 灰色模糊评价模型 technical basic sciences scientific and technological innovation group assessment evaluation index system grey and fuzzy evaluation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献56

  • 1道格拉斯·C·诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994..
  • 2张新华.科研管理三角形及其应用[J].黑龙江高教研究,1998,.
  • 3[1]Ancona,D.G. (1990). Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. [J] Academy of Management Journal. 33(2): 334-365.
  • 4[2]Ancona,D.g.&Caldwell,D.F.(1992):Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams. [J] Administrative science quarterly, 37:634-665.
  • 5[3]Cohen,S.G, Bailey,D.E (1997): What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. [J] Journal of Management. Vol23 No3 239-290.
  • 6[4]Hackman,J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. [C] Pp.315-342 in J.W.Lorsch(ED). Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • 7[5]Hambrick,D.C.&D'Aveni,R.A.(1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. [J] Management science,38(10):1445-1466.
  • 8[6]Henderson,J.C.&Lee,S.(1992). Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. [J] Management Science,38(6):757-777.
  • 9[7]Keller,R.T.(1994):Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. [J]Academy of management journal, 37:167-179.
  • 10[8]Kim,Y.&Lee,B.(1995). R&D project team and team performance in Korea: A multidimensional approach.[J] R&D Management,25(2):179-196.

共引文献164

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部