期刊文献+

延迟时间与预先信息对任务切换的作用 被引量:3

The Effects of Delay Time and Foreknowledge on Task Switching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对切换代价的本质存在任务设置惯性和任务设置重构两种观点。为揭示二者在切换代价中的关系,研究了不同延迟时间条件下预先信息对任务切换的作用,结果发现:(1)延迟时间对切换代价有显著影响,100ms的切换代价显著高于1000ms的切换代价,而600ms分别与100ms、1000ms之间的切换代价无显著差异;(2)预先信息对切换代价的影响显著,全部信息的切换代价显著低于无信息和部分信息的切换代价,而后二者之间无显著差异;(3)延迟时间与预先信息无交互作用。这表明,延迟时间与预先信息分别作用于任务设置惯性和任务设置重构,切换代价反映了这两种具有相加效应的加工过程。 Task switching refer to the process frequently from one task to another task,and the switching process is an important function of executive control,which control switching course between two tasks which compete for the same cognitive resources in working memory.In task switching,switch cost is the performance differences in task-switch and task-repetition trials.Based on the theories of the subtractive method reaction time,switch cost is the index of executive control.Recently,some researches have attempted to specify nature and origins of switch cost to uncover the mechanisms underlying task switching performance.Theoretically,there is disagreement as to whether switch cost actually represents the task-set reconfiguration or the task-set inertia.The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of delay time and foreknowledge on task switching.Explicit task-cueing paradigm was used in the present study.There were 29 participants(12 males and 17 females) volunteered to take part in the experiment.A 3(delay time:100ms,600ms and 1000ms) × 3(foreknowledge type:no foreknowledge,part foreknowledge and full foreknowledge) ×2(task type:switch task and repetition task) within-subject design was conducted to examined the mechanisms of effects of foreknowledge on task switching under the conditions of difference delay time.The correct RT and switch cost were measured.The results showed:(1) the main effect of delay time was significant,the switch cost with 100ms was larger than with 1000ms,however,no difference significantly among 600ms and 100ms or 1000ms.(2) The amount of switch cost depend on foreknowledge,switch cost was smaller with full foreknowledge than with part and no foreknowledge,but no difference significantly between the later two.(3) The interaction between delay time and foreknowledge did not appear.The findings suggested that delay time and foreknowledge acted on task-set inertia and task-set reconfiguration severally,which were two differences cognitive processes underlying switch cost.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期396-402,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 中央财经大学2010年度青年科研创新团队"转型期重点人群的社会心理指标跟踪与预警" 中财121人才工程青年博士发展基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30670717)
关键词 任务切换 切换代价 执行控制 task switching switch cost executive control
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献46

  • 1史艺荃,周晓林.执行控制研究的重要范式——任务切换[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):672-679. 被引量:21
  • 2齐冰,白学军,沈德立.材料类型和任务可预测性在任务转换中的作用[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):41-44. 被引量:5
  • 3Modern Chinese Frequency Dictionary (in Chinese). Beijing Language Institute Publisher, 1986(现代汉语频率词典.北京语言学院出版社,1986)
  • 4ColletteF, LindenM V. Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2002, 26:105 - 125
  • 5Norman D A, Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson R J,Schwartz G E, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self regulation. Advances in research and theory, New York: Plenum Press, 1986. 1 - 18
  • 6Baddeley A D, Hitch G. Working memory. In: Bower G Aed. The psychology of learning and motivation (vol.8). New York: Academic Press, 1974.47 - 89
  • 7Jersild A T, Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology (Whole No. 89), 1927
  • 8Biederman I. Human performance in contingent information processing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology :General, 1972, 93:219 -238
  • 9Allport D A, Styles E A, Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and performance, XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing, MIT Press, 1994. 421 -452
  • 10Dark V. Switching between memory and perception: Moving attention or moving memory retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 1990, 18:119 -127

共引文献11

同被引文献32

  • 1Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003, 7 (3) : 134-140.
  • 2Altmann E M, Gray W D. An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 2008, 115 (3) : 602-639.
  • 3Sohn M H, Anderson J R. Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2001, 130 (4) : 764-778.
  • 4Ruthruff E, Remington R W. Johnston J C. Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001, 27 (6) : 1404-1419.
  • 5Koch I, Allport A. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory and Cognition, 2006, 34 (2) : 433-444.
  • 6Waszak F, Hommel B. Allport A. Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching:, negative priming and competitor priming. Memory and Cognition, 2005, 33 (4) : 595-610.
  • 7Meiran N, Chorev Z, Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 2000, 41 (3) : 211-253.
  • 8Hsieh S. Two-component processes in switching attention: A study of event-related potentials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2002, 94 (2) : 1168-1176.
  • 9Allprot, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994) . Shifting inten- tional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: C. U- milta, M, Moscovith (Eds.) , Attention and pe(ormance, XV, Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum, 421-452.
  • 10Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000) . Task switching, stimulus-respon- sebindings and negative priming. In: S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.) : Control of cognitive processes: Attention and perfor- mance, Cambridge Massachusetts, 35-70.

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部