期刊文献+

利好、利空信息与证券市场稳定性 被引量:6

Market Reaction to Good and Bad News Based on Stability of Stock Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 在考虑中国投资者行为特征的基础上,运用前景理论建立具有有限理性的信息交易者和噪声交易者的动态投资决策模型,通过对模型均衡点的稳定性进行分析并结合计算实验的方法研究利好、利空信息在市场低迷、过渡和繁荣3个不同时期的作用情况及其作用机理。研究结果表明,在市场低迷时期,由于流动性风险过大带来的交易成本大幅增加,导致市场对利空信息的反应大于利好信息;在过渡时期,信息交易者成为调控市场的有效主体,市场对利好、利空信息的反应都是敏感的,利好信息使市场走向繁荣,利空信息使市场走向低迷;当市场处于繁荣时期,由于信息交易者和噪声交易者的交互作用,导致利好信息不但会降低市场的稳定性,还很容易引发大规模的市场波动,而市场对利空信息的反应却不大。研究结果可对市场实施信息调控提供理论指导,以维护中国证券市场长期良好发展。 Taking into consideration the behavior of investors, we set up a model to describe the decision-making of the investors with bounded rationality in the stock market with the prospect theory, which included the information trader and the noise trader. On the foundation of the study on the stability of the model, we studied the roles of good and bad information in stock market from the stagnant to the flourishing with the method of computational experiment, and obtained the results as follow. During the stagnant, the market reaction to bad news is bigger than that of good news because of the liquidity risk. During the transition, the market reaction to both bad and good news is sensitive, for information traders play an important role at this stage. The good news makes the market flourishing and the bad news lead to a sluggish market. However, in contrast with the stagnant, in the boom period, the good news could induce the bigger response than the bad news, since the co-existence of the informed traders and noise traders. Moreover, the good news could also reduce the stable area and be easy to cause the market fluctuation when the force of the news is strong enough. The result of this paper is useful for government to adjust and control stock market using the appropriate information.
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期85-93,共9页 Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(70932003 70871056) 教育部科技创新工程重大项目培育资金(708044) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJCZH061)~~
关键词 利好信息 利空信息 前景理论 市场稳定性 计算试验 good news bad news prospect theory market stability computational experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Braun P A, Nelson D B, Sunnier A M. Good news, bad news, volatility, and betas [ J ]. The Journal of Finance, 1995,50 ( 5 ) : 1575-1603.
  • 2Chulia H, Martens M, Dijk D V. Asymmetric effects of federal funds target rate changes on S&P 100 stock returns, volatilities and correlations [ J ]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010,34(4) :834-839.
  • 3POOh S H, Taylor S J. Stock returns and volatility: An empirical study of the UK stock market [ J ]. .loumal of Bankinz & Finance. 1992.16( 1 ) :37-59.
  • 4Yeh Y H, Lee T S. The interaction and volatility asymmetry of unexpected returns in the greater China stock markets [ J ]. Global Finance Journal, 2000,11 (1) :129-149.
  • 5陆蓉,徐龙炳.“牛市”和“熊市”对信息的不平衡性反应研究[J].经济研究,2004,39(3):65-72. 被引量:198
  • 6Boyd J H, Hu J, Jagannathan R. The stock market' s reaction to unemployment news:Why bad news is usually good for stocks [ J ] . The Journal of Finance, 2005,60(2) :649-672.
  • 7Knif J, Kolari J, Pynnoonen S. Stock market reaction to good and bad inflation news [ J ]. The Journal of Financial Research, 2008,31 (2) : 141-166.
  • 8Andersen T G, Bollerslev T, Diebold F X. Roughing it up:Including jump components in the measurement, modeling and forecasting of return volatility [ J ]. The Review of Economics and Statistics ,2007, 89(4) :701-720.
  • 9Basistha A, Kurov A. Macroeconomic cycles and the stock market' s reaction to monetary policy [ J ]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2008,32 ( 12 ) : 2606 - 2616.
  • 10Beber A, Brandt M W. When it cannot get better or worse:The asymmetric impact of good and bad news on bond returns in expansions and recessions [ J ]. Review of Finance, 2010,14 ( 1 ) : 119-155.

二级参考文献82

共引文献417

同被引文献111

引证文献6

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部