期刊文献+

骨髓增生异常综合征患者骨髓CD34+细胞亚群及其表面造血因子受体的表达 被引量:6

Differentiation and expression of membrane hemopoietic cytokine receptors on CD34+ bone marrow cells in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者骨髓CD34+细胞亚群及其表面干细胞因子受体(SCF-R)、红细胞生成素受体(EpoR)、粒细胞集落刺激因子受体(G-CSFR)及血小板生成素受体(TpoR)的表达情况及其意义。方法采用流式细胞术检测2008年7月至2010年3月天津医科大学总医院新诊断的45例MDS患者(17例低危患者、28例高危患者)及30名对照组原代骨髓CD34+CD38+及CD34+CD38+细胞亚群及其表面SCF-R、EpoR、G.CSFR及Tp0R的表达率。结果高危组CD34+细胞比例[0.53%(0.10%~1.68%)]明显高于对照组[0.13%(0.08%~0.32%),P〈0.01],其他2组问比较差异无统计学意义。低危组和高危组CD34+CD38+细胞比例(86.3%±8.5%、82.6%±11.1%)显著低于对照组(92.3%±3.4%,均P〈0.05),而CD34+CD38+细胞比例(13.7%±8.5%、17.4%±11.0%)显著高于对照组(7.7%±3.4%,均P〈0.05)。对照组骨髓CD34+CD38+细胞亚群EpoR表达率(18.7%±18.3%)显著低于CD34+CD38+细胞亚群(63.6%±20.O%,P〈0.01),两亚群之间SCF-R、G-CSFR及TpoR表达率差异无统计学意义。在CD34+CD38+细胞亚群中,3组间SCF-R和TpoR表达率差异无统计学意义,而低危组和高危组EpoR的表达率[9.0%(1.4%~12.7%)、5.2%(1.1%~14.1%)]明显低于对照组[9.6%(5.1%~30.1%),均P〈0.05],G—CSFR的表达率(29.8%4-19.1%、28.7%±21.1%)明显低于对照组(44.4%4-23.4%,均P〈0.05);在CD34+CD38+细胞亚群中,3组间SCF-R和G-CSFR表达率差异无统计学意义,低危组和高危组EpoR的表达率(42.2%±21.9%、25.7%±15.6%)明显低于对照组(63.6%±20.O%,均P〈0.01),TpoR的表达率(5.4%±4.7%、4.1%±4.0%)明显低于对照组(10.1%±8.3%,均P〈0.05)。MDS患者骨髓CD34+CD38+和CD34+CD38+细胞亚群表面受体表达率低的患者其外周血血红蛋白水平、中性粒细胞及血小板计数减低的发生率明显高于受体表达率不低的患者(均P〈0.05)。结论MDS患者的原代骨髓CD34’细胞亚群分化异常,膜表面部分造血细胞因子受体表达减低,这可能与MDS患者血细胞减少有关,有望用于辅助诊断MDS。 Objective To detect the abnormalities of differentiation and expression of membrane hemopoietic cytokine receptors on CD34+ bone marrow cells in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Methods Forty-five newly diagnosed MDS cases from July 2008 to March 2010 in our hospitaland 30 normal controls were enrolled. There were 17 low-risk and 28 high-risk patients. The CD34 + CD38 + and CD34 + CD38- bone marrow cells and the expressions of stem cell factor receptor (SCF-R), erythropoietin receptor ( EpoR ), granuloeyte colony-stimulating factor receptors ( G-CSFR ) and thrnmbopoietin receptor (TpoR) on those cells were measured by flow eytnmetry. Results The mean percentage of CD34+ in karyocyte of MDS eases in high-risk patients [0. 53% (0. 10% - 1.68% ) ] was significantly higher than that of control group [ 0. 13% (0. 08% - 0. 32% ), P 〈 0. 01 ]. The mean percentages of CD34 + CD38 + cells were significantly lower in low and high-risk groups (86. 3% ± 8.5% and 82. 6% ± 11. 1% ) than those in control group (92. 3% ± 3.4% ). And the percentage of CD34 + CD38- cells was significantly higher in either low-risk or high-risk group ( 13.7% -+ 8. 5% and 17.4% -+ 11.0% ) than that in control group (7.7% ± 3.4% , both P 〈 0. 05 ). In control group, the mean percentage of antigen expression of EpoR was significantly lower in CD34+ CD38 + cells than that in CD34+ CD38+ cells ( 18.7%± 18.3% vs 63.6% ± 20. 0% , P 〈 0. 01 ). The expressions of SCF-R, G-CSFR and TpoR were not significantly different between two cell populations. The expressions of EpoR on CD34 + CD38 + cells of low and high-risk MDS groups [9. 0% ( 1.4% - 12. 7% ), 5.2% ( 1.1% - 14. 1% ) ] were significantly lower than those of control group [9. 6% (5.1% -30. 1% ), both P 〈0. 05]. The expressions of G-CSFR on CD34+CD38+ cells of low and high-risk MDS groups (29. 8% ± 19. 1% , 28. 7%± 21. 1%) were significantly lower than those of control group (44. 4%±23.4%, both P 〈0. 05). The quantities of EpoR on CD34 +CD38+ cells of low and high-risk MDS groups (42.2% ±21.9%, 25.7%± 15.6%) were significantly lower than those of control group (63.6% ±20. 0% , both P 〈0. 01 ). The expressions of TpoR on CD34 ~ CD38- cells of low and high-risk MDS groups (5.4% ± 4.7%, 4. 1% ± 4. 0%) were significantly lower than those of control group ( 10. 1% ±8.3% , both P 〈 0. 05 ) . The incidence of cytopenia with low expression rates of hemopoietic cytokine receptors on CD34+ cells was higher than that of MDS with high expression rates. Conclusion The abnormalities of differentiation and membrane hemopoietie cytokine receptors expression of CD34+ bone marrow cells in MDS are associated with MDS cytopenia and may be useful for the diagnosis of MDS.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期234-238,共5页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 国家“十一五”科技支撑计划(2008BAl61802) 天津市科技支撑计划重大疾病防治专项基金(07ZCGYSF00600)
关键词 骨髓增生异常综合征 抗原 CD34 原癌基因蛋白质C-KIT 受体 红细胞生成 受体 粒细胞集落刺激因子 Myelodysplastic syndromes Antigens, CD34 Proto-oncogene protein c-kit Receptors, erythropoietin Receptors, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1施均,邵宗鸿,刘鸿,陈桂彬,张益枝,白洁,何广胜,付蓉,赵明峰,曹燕然,吴玉红,井丽萍,郝玉书,杨天楹,杨崇礼.联合化疗治疗高危组骨髓增生异常综合征及其转化的急性髓系细胞白血病疗效分析[J].中国实用内科杂志,2004,24(9):531-532. 被引量:9
  • 2施均,邵宗鸿,刘鸿,白洁,曹燕然,何广胜,凃梅峰,王秀丽,郝玉书,杨天楹,杨崇礼.Transformation of myelodysplastic syndromes into acute myeloid leukemias[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2004(7):963-967. 被引量:9
  • 3曹燕然,邵宗鸿,施均,王化泉,刘鸿,付蓉,赵明峰,何广胜,白洁,涂梅峰,邢莉民,崔振珠,孙娟,贾海蓉,杨天楹.骨髓增生异常综合征多指标综合诊断的前瞻性研究[J].中国实用内科杂志,2006,26(8):1145-1147. 被引量:12
  • 4Lorand-Metze hematopoietic I, Ribeiro E, Lima CS, maturation abnormalities by et al. Detection of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes and its utility for the differential diagnosis with non-clonal disorders. Leuk Res, 2007, 31 : 147- 155.
  • 5Loken MR, van de Loosdrecht A, Ogata K, et al. Flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes: report from a working conference. Leuk Res, 2008, 32:5-17.
  • 6Stachurski D, Smith BR, Pozdnyakova O, et al. Flow cytometric analysis of myelomonocytic cells by a pattern recognition approach is sensitive and specific in diagnosing myelodysplastic syndrome and related marrow diseases: emphasis on a global evaluation and recognition of diagnostic pitfalls. Leuk Res, 2008, 32:215-224.
  • 7van de Loosdrecht AA, Westers TM, Westra AH, et al. Identification of distinct prognostic subgroups in low- and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes by flow cytometry. Blood, 2008, 111: 1067-1077.
  • 8van de Loosdrecht AA, Alhan C, Bene MC, et al. Standardization of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes: report from the first European Leukemia Net working conference on flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes. Hematologica, 2009, 94 : 1124- 1134.
  • 9Della Porta MG, Maleovati L, Invemizzi R, et al. Flow cytometry evaluation of erythroid dysplasia in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia, 2006, 20:549-555.
  • 10Wells DA, Benesch M, Loken MR, et al. Myeloid and monocytic dyspoiesis as determined by flow cytometric scoring in myelodysplastic syndrome correlates with the IPSS and with outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood, 2003, 102:394-403.

共引文献20

同被引文献68

  • 1周永明.骨髓增生异常综合征的中医病机特点和治疗对策[J].中医杂志,2005,46(5):383-385. 被引量:27
  • 2黎莉,徐从高,王秀问,郭其森,孙亚红,孙丽美.重组人白介素-11治疗化疗所致血小板减少症的疗效和机制[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(6):377-379. 被引量:23
  • 3潘娟,甘欣锦2.血可宁治疗化疗后血小板减少的实验研究[J].吉林中医药,2005,25(12):57-59. 被引量:9
  • 4冯宝章,郝玉书.MDS骨髓细胞癌变的主要机制[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2006,15(2):148-150. 被引量:7
  • 5Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 4th Edition. Lyon: IARC Press,2008 : 87 - 103.
  • 6Lacombe F, Durrieu F, Briais A, et al. Flow cytometry CIM5 gating for immunophenotyping of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia, 1997; 11(11) :1878 -1886.
  • 7Xu D, Schuhz C, Akker Y, et al. Evidence for expression of early myeloidantigens in mature, non-blast myeloid cells in myelodyspla- sia. Am J Hematol,2003 ;74( 1 ) :9 - 16.
  • 8Ogata K, Nakamura K, Yokose N, et al. Clinical significance of phenotypic features of blasts in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood ,2002 ; 100 ( 12 ) :3887 - 3896.
  • 9Ogata K, Yoshida Y. Clinical implications of blast immunopheno- types in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia Lymphoma, 2005 ;46 (9) :1269 - 1274.
  • 10Fuchigami K, Moil H, Matsuo T, et al. Absolute number of circulating CD34 + cells is abnormally low in refractory anemias and extremely high in RAEB and RAEB-t:novel pathologic features of myelodysplastic syndromes identif ied by highly sensitive flow cytometry. Leuk Res, 2000;24(2) :163 - 174.

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部