期刊文献+

北京老年男性糖尿病风险积分的探讨和应用 被引量:4

Investigation and application of a diabetes risk score in predicting incident diabetes in male senile people in Beijing
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 尝试建立北京老年男性的糖尿病风险积分(DRS)以预测个体未来糖尿病发生的风险.方法 依据试验组1 370例(年龄为48~87岁)非糖尿病男性患者随访10年的队列资料,运用多元logistic逐步回归建立DRS,同时在检验组340例(年龄为43~88岁)非糖尿病男性患者随访10年的队列资料中进行检验.结果 受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示曲线下面积(AUC)最大的DRS模型包括年龄、高血压史、既往高血糖史、体重指数、空腹血糖、甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C),以此模型建立DRS积分系统,累积分值范围为0~12,4为最佳切点,此积分在试验组和检验组中的AUC分别0.726(95%CI0.692~0.759)和0.765(95%CI 0.691~0.839),敏感性分别为65.3%和68.1%,特异性分别为70.0%和64.8%,阳性预测值分别为37.0%和23.2%,阴性预测值分别为88.2%和94.1%.结论 此DRS结合了一般临床信息、血糖和血脂,对未来糖尿病具有较好的预测效能. Objective To develop a diabetes risk score (DRS)to predict the risk of development of incident diabetes in male senile people in Beijing. Methods DRS was developed basing on a test group including a cohort of 1 370 individuals aged 48-87 years without diabetes at baseline, followed for 10 years by Logistic regression and validated on a value group including a cohort of 340 individuals aged 43-88 years without diabetes at baseline. Results The model with the highest area under the ROC curve ( AUC ) included age, hypertension,history of hyperglycemia, body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, triglycerides, and high-density lipoproteincholesterol (HDL-C). DRS was developed basing on this model with a range from 0 to 12 and an optimal cut-off of 4. AUC were respectively 0. 726 ( 95% CI0. 692-0. 759 ) and 0. 765 ( 95% CI0. 691-0. 839 ) in test group and validation group. The sum score value ≥4 had sensitivity of 65.3% and 68. 1%, specificity of 70. 0% and 64.8%, positive predictive value of 37.0% and 23.2%, negative predictive value of 88.2% and 94. 1%.Conclusion The DRS, derived from clinical information combined with plasma glucose and lipids, is an effective tool to predict incident diabetes.
出处 《中华内分泌代谢杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期1038-1041,共4页 Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
关键词 糖尿病风险积分 糖尿病 受试者特征工作曲线 队列研究 Diabetes risk score Diabetes mellitus Receiver-operating characteristic curve Cohort study
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Wild S,Roglic G,Green A,et al.Global prevalence of diabetes:estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.Diabetes Care,2004,27:1047-1053.
  • 2Rathmann W,Haastert B,Icks A,et al.High prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus inSouthern Germany:target populations for efficient screening:the KORA survey 2000.Diabetologia,2003,46:182-t89.
  • 3Brohall G,Behre CJ,Hulthe J,et al.Prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in 64-year-old Swedish women:experiences of using repeated oral glucose tolerance tests.Diabetes Care,2006,29:363-367.
  • 4Dong Y,Gao W,Nan H,et al.Prevalence of Type 2 diabetes in urban and rural Chinese populations in Qingdao,China Diabetic Medicine,2005,22:1427-1433.
  • 5Stem MP,Williams K,Haffner SM.Identification of persons at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus:do we need the oral glucose tolerance test? Ann Intern Med,2002,136:575-581.
  • 6Lindstrom J,Tuomilehto J.The diabetes risk score:a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk.Diabetes Care,2003,26:725-731.
  • 7Lidfeldt J,Nerbrand C,Samaioe G,et al.A screening procedure detecting high-yield candidates for OGTT.The Women's Health in the Lund Area (WHILA)study:a population based study of middle-aged Swedish women.Eur J Epidemiol,2001,17:943-951.
  • 8Glümer C,Borch-Johnsen K,Colagiuri S.Can a screening programme for diabetes be applied to another population? Diabet Med,2005,22:1234-1238.
  • 9Alberti KG,Zimmet P,Shaw J.International Diabetes Federation:a consensus on Type 2 diabetes prevention.Diabet Med,2007,24:451-463.
  • 10中国肥胖问题工作组数据汇总分析协作组.我国成人体重指数和腰围对相关疾病危险因素异常的预测价值:适宜体重指数和腰围切点的研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2002,23(1):5-10. 被引量:3340

二级参考文献9

共引文献3359

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部