摘要
目的:比较样本人群社区牙周指数(CPI)牙,半口牙龈出血指数与全口牙龈出血指数是否存在差异。方法:抽取北京市海淀区某社区18岁以上女性受试者600例,将其随机分为两组分别进行全口牙龈出血指数(GBI)、龈沟出血指数(SBI)的检查,将其结果与CPI牙和半口牙的结果相比较。结果:CPI牙与全口牙检查的结果差异显著(P<0.05)。但CPI牙加上33或43或25的GBI值与全口牙GBI值差异无显著性(P>0.05)。左侧,右侧和对角线半口牙SBI值与全口牙SBI值差异无显著性(P>0.05);对角线半口牙GBI值与全口牙GBI值差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:在女性牙龈出血的检查中仅用CPI指数牙易出现偏差。左侧上下、右侧上下和对角线半口牙可代表全口牙的SBI;对角线半口牙可代表全口牙的GBI。
AIM: To assess the representation of the community periodontal Index(CPI) teeth and half-mouth examination.METHODS: Data were derived from 600 females(above 18 years old) of Haidian community of Beijing.Gingival bleeding index(GBI) and sulcus bleeding index(SBI) were evaluated between CPI teeth,half-mouth and full-mouth examination.RESULTS: There was significant difference between CPI teeth and full-mouth examination(P0.05).But There was no significant difference between CPI+33,CPI+43,CPI+25 teeth and full-mouth examination for GBI(P0.05).There was no significant difference between left,right,diagonal half-mouth and full-mouth examination for SBI(P0.05).And there was no significant difference between diagonal half-mouth and full-mouth examination for GBI(P0.05).CONCLUSION:Based on the findings of this study,the result of CPI teeth on gingival bleeding index can not correctly reflect the females' full-mouth situation.Left side of mandibuler and maxillary,right side of mandibuler and maxillary,diagonal half-mouth examination can be used for full-mouth examination of SBI.Diagonal half-mouth examination can be used for full-mouth examination of GBI.
出处
《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2010年第12期710-713,717,共5页
Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
关键词
社区牙周指数
半口牙
全口检查
牙龈出血指数
龈沟出血指数
流行病学
community periodontal index(CPI)
half-mouth
full-mouth examination
gingival bleeding index
sulcus bleeding index
epidemiology