期刊文献+

DNA定量在乳腺导管非典型增生与原位癌诊断中的应用 被引量:3

Quantitative measurement of DNA content in diagnosis of breast ductal atypical hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的DNA定量鉴别乳腺导管非典型增生与原位癌、原位癌及浸润癌。方法对乳腺导管非典型增生(7例)、原位癌(15例)及浸润癌(18例)共计40例进行细胞涂片,Feulgen染色,全自动图像分析仪进行细胞核定量检测。结果乳腺导管非典型增生及原位癌均未见DNA异倍体,未出现五倍体(5c)细胞,两组间DNA指数及S期细胞比率有统计学差别(P<0.05)。浸润癌检测到大量DNA异倍体,出现五倍体(5c)细胞,DNA指数及S期细胞比率高于原位癌,但不具有统计学差别(P>0.05)。结论利用图像分析仪检测DNA含量、S期细胞比率对乳腺导管非典型增生与原位癌的鉴别、原位癌与浸润癌的鉴别具有一定的临床意义。 Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of quantitative measurement of DNA content in differential diagnosis of proliferative breast diseases.Methods Cytological smears from a total of 40 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia(ADH,7 cases),ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS,15 cases)and invasive carcinoma(INV,18 cases)were subjected to Feulgen staining and image cytometry for quantitative detection of nuclear DNA.Results The ADH and DCIS showed no DNA aneuploidy,and there were no 5c cells.The S phase fraction and DNA index of DCIS showed higher values than that in the ADH with a statistically significant difference(P0.05).INV showed DNA aneuploidy,and the presence of 5c cells.The S phase fraction and DNA index of INV were higher than that of DCIS,but the difference was statistically not significant.Conclusions Quantitative evaluation of DNA content by image cytometry and S-phase fraction may have potential significance in differential diagnosis of breast ADH and DCIS,DCIS and INV.
出处 《中国体视学与图像分析》 2010年第4期425-427,共3页 Chinese Journal of Stereology and Image Analysis
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30872414)
关键词 图像分析仪 非典型增生 乳腺肿瘤 DNA含量 S期细胞比率 image cytometry atypical ductal hyperplasia breast neoplasms DNA content S phase fraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Vogelbruch M, Bocking A, Rutten A, et al. DNA image cytometry in malignant and benign sweat gland tumours [ J]. The British Journal of Dermatology, 2000, 142(4) : 688 - 693.
  • 2李志华,夏潮涌,黄中新,覃莉,唐海兰,饶晓黎.乳腺癌细胞核DNA含量不同分析方法的比较[J].中国体视学与图像分析,2003,8(3):154-157. 被引量:14
  • 3Yildirim A S, Combos A, Hopfenmuller W, et al. The prognostic significance of determining DNA content in breast cancer by DNA image cytometry: the role of high grade aneuploidy in node negative breast cancer [ J ]. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2007, 60(6): 649- 655.
  • 4Merkel D E, Me Guire W L. Ploidy, proliferative activity and prognosis: DNA flow cytometry of solid tumors [ J ]. Cancer, 1990, 65(5) : 1194 - 1205.
  • 5Barlogie B, Raber M N, Schumann J. Flow cytometry in clinic cancer research [J].Cancer Research, 1983, 43 : 3982 - 3997.
  • 6Joensuu H, Alanen K, Falkmer U G, et al. Effect of DNA ploidy classification on prognosis in breast Cancer [ J]. International Journal of Cancer, 1992, 52 (5) :701 - 706.
  • 7Hedley D W, Rugg C A, Ng A B, et al. Influencen of celluar DNA content on disease - free survival of stage II breast cancer patients [ J]. Cancer Research, 1984, 44 ( 11 ) : 5395 - 5398.
  • 8O' Reilly S M, Camplejohn R S, Barnes D M, et al. DNA index, S - phase fraction histological grade and prognosis in breast cancer[ J]. British Journal of Cancer, 1990, 61(5) : 671 -674.
  • 9Wenger C R, Clark G M. S-phase fraction and breast cancer - a decade of experience [ J ]. Breast Cancer Reseach and Treatment, 1998, 51 (3) : 255 - 265.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Norris HJ, Bahr GF, Mikel UV. A comparative morphometry and cytophotometric study of intraductal hyperplasis and intraductal carcinoma of the breast. Anal Quant Cytol Histol, 1988, 10:1-3
  • 2Bocking A, Chrieber C. DNA aneuploidy as a marker of prospective malignancy in mastopa-thias. Nineteenth International Congress of the IAP. Madrid, Abstracts Ⅱ. 1992; 114-117
  • 3Spyratos F, Brifod M. Flow cytomutric styoly of DNA distribution in cytopunctures of benign and malignant breast lesions. Anal Quant Cytol Histol, 1987, 9:485-488
  • 4Baak JPA. Manual of quantitative pathology in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Berlin Heidelberg New Yprk:Springer-Verlag. 1991:218-222
  • 5Jeousuu H. Effect of DNA ploid classification on prognosis in breast cancer. Int J cancer. 1992, 52(5): 701-703
  • 6Gundersen HJG. The nucleator. J. Microsc, 1988; 151:5-6
  • 7Gundersen HJG. Bagger P, Bendtse FT, et al. The new sterological tools: Disector, fractionator and point sampled intercept and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS, 1988; 96:857-860
  • 8G. Haroske, E Giroud, A. Reith, A. bocking. 1997 ESCAP consensus report on diagnostic DNA image cytometery Part; Bisic consideration and recommendations preparation measurement and interpretation.Analytical Cellular Patholgy1998, 17:189-200
  • 9夏潮涌.DNA含量检测在肿瘤学研究中的新进展[J].实用肿瘤杂志,1999,14(1):5-6. 被引量:6
  • 10夏潮涌.肿瘤细胞DNA倍体分析中易于误解的若干问题[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2001,23(5):353-354. 被引量:7

共引文献13

同被引文献26

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部