期刊文献+

中国运动员国际体育仲裁胜诉第一案述评——兴奋剂处罚的程序正义问题 被引量:22

Review of the First Recovering Case of the Chinese Athlete in International Sports Arbitration:The Procedural Justice in the Doping Disciplining
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际体育仲裁院最近推翻了对中国柔道运动员佟文的兴奋剂禁赛处罚,这是中国运动员在国际体育仲裁中第一次胜诉。该案明确了程序规则的含义,强调了程序权利的重要性,明确了程序瑕疵的弥补方法,肯定了体育仲裁中禁反言原则的适用。它启示中国体育界人士应重视兴奋剂检验程序中的程序正义,对运动员的法律救助要制度化,建立运动员法律救助资金保障制度,充分利用国际体育仲裁机制。但本裁决在裁决理由上应做更详细的说明。 The Court of Arbitration for Sport has overturned the decision of the International Judo Federation which imposed a two-year ban on the Chinese judoka Tong Wen for doping.It is the first recovering case of the Chinese athlete in international sports arbitration.In the award of the case,the panel has clarified the meaning of the procedural rules,emphasized the importance of the procedural rights,made clear of the method to change the procedural flaw and recognized the application of the principle of estoppels in the sports arbitration.It tells us that we should pay more attention to the procedural justice,systemized the legal assistance to the athlete,create the income-maintenance programs of legal assistance for the athlete,and make full use of the international sports arbitration.But the reason of the award should be more detailed.
作者 宋彬龄
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《天津体育学院学报》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期109-113,共5页 Journal of Tianjin University of Sport
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:06BTY013)
关键词 体育仲裁 程序正义 兴奋剂 sports arbitration procedural justice doping
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1李海燕,丁彩霞.反兴奋剂中几个法律问题探究[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,33(6):77-80. 被引量:7
  • 2兆丰.《人民司法》蓉城颁奖[J].人民司法,2000(4):21-21. 被引量:1
  • 3Michael S.Foreword:Arbitrating Sports Disputes:A World View[J].Valparaiso University Law Review,2001:237-238.
  • 4Travis T.Winners Never Dope and Finally,Dopers Never Win:Usada Takes Over Drug Testing of United States Olympic Athletes[J].DePaul Journal of Sports Law & Contemporary Problems,2003:144-145.
  • 5Michael.S.Enhancing the Performance of the Doping Court of Arbitration for Sport Can Do Its Job Better[J].Loyola University Chicago Law Journal,2005:1227.
  • 6国际奥委会.洛桑宣言[R].1999.
  • 7Michael S.Doping Due Process:A Critique of the Doping Control Process in International Sport[J].Dickinson Law Review,2002:563-564.
  • 8Michels v. U.S.O.C., 741 F. 2d 155 (7th Cir. 1984).
  • 9Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 335 (1976).
  • 10Get IAAF to pay Krabbe Compensation, BBC Sport, June 27, 2001, http://www.news. bbc. co. uk/sport/hi/english/athletics/newsid- 1410000/1410443. stm (last visited Feb. 22, 2002).

同被引文献187

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部