期刊文献+

前列腺电切术后两种引流袋对尿路感染的作用比较 被引量:4

Comparison on the role of two drainage bags to urinary tract infection after transurethral resection of prostate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨抗返流引流袋在减少前列腺电切术后尿路感染中的作用。方法前列腺电切术后留置导尿的179例患者被随机分成抗返流引流袋组(A组94例)和普通集尿袋组(B组85例),抗返流引流袋每周更换一次,普通集尿袋每天更换一次。对两组一周以内及一周以上的尿培养结果行统计学分析。结果两组在一周以内及一周以上的尿培养细菌阳性率比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=24.37,P<0.01;χ2=33.13,P<0.01)。结论抗返流引流袋可以减少前列腺电切术后留置导尿患者的尿路感染。 Objective To explore the role of antireflux drainage bag to reduce urinary tract infection after transurethral resection of prostate(TURP).Methods 179 patients with indwelling urethral catheter after TURP were randomly divided into antireflux drainage bags group(A group,94 cases) and common urine collection bags group(B group,85 cases).Antireflux drainage bags were replaced once weekly.Common urine collection bags were replaced once daily.The culture positive rates of urine specimens under and over one week were statistical analyzed in two groups.Results The culture positive rates of urine specimens under and over one week showed significant difference in two groups(p0.01 and p0.01).Conclusion Antireflux drainage bag can reduce urinary tract infection of patients with indwelling urethral catheter after TURP.
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2011年第7期141-142,共2页 Hainan Medical Journal
关键词 前列腺电切术 抗返流引流袋 普通集尿袋 尿路感染 Transurethral resection of prostate Antireflux drainage bag Common urine collection bag Urinary tract infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

共引文献34

同被引文献33

  • 1陈爱金,林洁.抗折返引流尿袋与普通集尿袋对尿路感染影响的比较[J].福建中医学院学报,2005,15(5):57-58. 被引量:16
  • 2沈赛娟,张鹏年,江琳.抗返流引流袋在减少术后患者尿路感染中的作用[J].安徽医药,2007,11(9):851-852. 被引量:16
  • 3Guajardo ara CE, Gonz61ez Martinez PM, Ayala Gaytan JJ. An- tibiotic resistance of Esherichia coli from community acquired uri- nary tract infections. What antimicrobial to use [J ]. Salud Publica Mex, 2009, 51 (2): 155-159.
  • 4Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaneomycin versus teicoplainin: systematic review and meta- analysis [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2009, 53 (10) : 4069-4079.
  • 5Guajardo - Lara CE, Gonzalez - Martfnez PM, Ayala - Gaytan JJ. Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia eoli from community - acquired u-rinary tract infections. What mltimicrobial to use? J Salud Public Mex, 2009,51 (2) :155 - 159.
  • 6Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M. Comparative etcacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta - analy- sis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2009,53(10) :4069 -4079.
  • 7Kallenberg F, Hossaek TA, Woo HH. kong - term followup after e- lectrocautery transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Adv Uml, 2011:359478.
  • 8Watts RE, Hancock V, Ong CL, et al. Escherichia coli isolates cau- sing asymptomatie baeteriufia in catheterized and noncatheterized in- dividuals possess similar virulence properties. ] Clln Mierobiol, 2010,48(7) :2449-2458.
  • 9陈红花.导尿管相关尿路感染危险因素调查分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2008,18(9):1276-1278. 被引量:97
  • 10雷小玲,邹瑞芳.导尿与留置导尿医院感染的防治[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2009,19(22):3055-3056. 被引量:33

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部