组织内知识共享:概念、测量与整合模型被引量：3

Knowledge Sharing in Organization:Concept,Measurement and Unified Model

导出

摘要清晰界定知识共享概念,对其测量维度加以归纳,提炼出四类影响因素:知识特性、主体特性(如自我效能感)、主体间关联特性和环境特性(如组织氛围),分别从组织与个人绩效对知识共享的作用予以阐述,并在分析研究现状的基础上构建知识共享整合模型。 The paper briefly explains the concept of knowledge sharing （KS） and the measurement dimensions. Then it introduces the main factors ＇affecting KS ： properties of knowledge, properties of a unit （ e. g. , sense of self-worth） , properties of relationships between units, and properties of environment （ e. g. , organizational climate）. It also analyzes the tunctions of KS from the perspective of individual and organization influence. At last, the paper analyzes the present structures, builds a unified model of KS.

作者史江涛

机构地区山西大学经济与工商管理学院

出处《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第8期121-125,共5页 Library and Information Service

关键词知识共享测量维度整合模型 knowledge sharing measurement dimensions unified model

分类号 G302 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1Alavi M, Leidner D. Review: KnoMedge management and knowledge managemenl systems. MIS Quarierly ,2001,25 ( 1 ) : 107 - 136.
2Lin H, Lee G. Perceptions of senior managers toward knowledgesharing behavior. Management Decision,2004,42( 1 ) : 108 - 125.
3Senge P. Sharing knowledge. Executive excellence, 1998,15 (6) : 11 - 12.
4Gilbert M, Cordey-Hayes M. Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve suecessful technological innovation. Tcchnvation,1996,16(6) :301 -312,315.
5Hendriks P. Why share knowtedge? The influence of ICT on motivation tot knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 1999,6(2) :91 - 100.
6Nonaka I, Takcuchi H. The knowledge creating company. New York : Oxford University Press, 1995 : 9 - 58.
7Davenport T,Prusak L. How organization manage what they know. Cambridge : Harvard Business School Press, 1998 : 17 - 18.
8Ford D. Knowledge sharing:Seeking to understand intentions and actual sharing[ dissertation ]. Kingston : Quee' s University,2004.
9Ardichvili A, Page V, Wentling T. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-shm-ing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2003,7 ( 1 ) :64 - 77.
10Hooff B,Ridder J. Knowledge sharing in context. Journal of Knowl edge Managetneut ,2004,8 (6) : 117 - 130.

二级参考文献48

1Reagans, R. , & McEvily, B. Network structure and knowl- edge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range[ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003 (48) : 240 - 267.
2Leenders, R. , van Engelen, J. M. L. , & Kratzer, J. Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective [ J ]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2003 (20) : 69 - 92.
3Koskinen, K. U. , Pihlanto, P. , Vanharanta, H. Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context[ J]. International Journal of Project Management 2003 ( 21 ) : 281-290.
4Bstieler, L. The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty on New Product Development and Time Efficiency[ J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2005 (22) : 267 - 284.
5Utterback, J. The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm[ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1971 ( 2 ) : 75 - 88.
6Campbell, D. J. and Gingrich, K. F. The interactive effects of task complexity and participation on task performance: a field experiment[ J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986 (38) :162 - 180.
7De Brentani Ulrike , Kleinschmidt Elko J . . Corporate Culture and Commitment : Impact on Performance of International New Product Development Programs [ J ] . Journal of Product Innovation Management , 2004 (5) :309 - 333.
8Dodgson, M. Organizational learning: a review of some literatures[ J]. Organization Studies, 1993 (14) : 375 - 394.
9Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation [ J ]. Organization Science, 1994 (5), 14 - 37.
10Vakkari, P. Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval[ J]. Information Processing & Management 1999 (35) : 135 -157.