期刊文献+

基于偏微分方程的肉品图像去噪对比研究 被引量:2

COMPARISON OF MEAT IMAGE DENOISING ALGORITHMS BASED ON PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 肉品中含有水分,或者切割过程中产生的脂肪碎屑或结缔组织,其可见光图像容易产生噪声。基于偏微分方程模型的算法去噪同时能够保持图像的某些特征,常见的有Perona-Malik模型、全变差ROF模型、Y-K四阶模型。通过对Lena图像加入高斯噪声和椒盐噪声,对比了三种模型的信噪比、方法噪声及运算时间。在此基础上,以猪肉图像为去噪对象,比较三种算法的性能。结果表明:ROF模型在去除噪声的同时,保持细节的能力强于其他两种模型,YK四阶偏微分方程模型能够去除噪声,但是图像模糊。去噪效果最差的是P-M模型。 Meat product contains moisture contents as well as fat chips and connective tissues produced during the cutting process,so the noise is common in its image under visible light.The algorithms based on partial differential equation model can remove the noise as well as keep certain features of the image,the widely used models are the Perona-Malik model,the ROF total variation model and the Y-K fourth-order model.In this paper we compared these three models in their signal-to-noise ratios,method noise and operating time by mixing the Gauss noise and the spiced salt noise with the Lena image,and on this basis we selected the pork image as denosing object and compared the performance of these three models.Experimental result showed that the ROF model is superior in maintaining the image details when removing the noise than other two models,the Y-K fourth-order partial differential equation model can remove the noise but with blurring image,and the P-M model is the worst among the three in removing the meat image noise.
出处 《计算机应用与软件》 CSCD 2011年第4期109-112,共4页 Computer Applications and Software
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2008AA10Z211) 校博士基金项目(08zx7101)
关键词 肉品图像 Perona-Malik模型 全变差 ROF模型 You-Kaveh四阶模型 方法噪声 Meat image Perona-Malik model ROF total variation model Y-K fourth-order model Method noise
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献51

共引文献85

同被引文献22

  • 1仵冀颖,阮秋琦,安高云.偏微分方程约束下基于动态大小模块的图像修复模型[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2007,19(8):1034-1040. 被引量:3
  • 2Xu R,Chen Y W.Wavelet-based multiresolution medical image regis-tration strategy combining mutual information with spatial information[J].International Journal of Innovative Computing,Information and Control,2007,3(2):285-296.
  • 3Manjon J V,Carbonell C J,Lull J J,et al.MRI denoising using non-lo-cal means[J].Medical Image Analysis,2008(12):514-523.
  • 4Buades A,Coll B,Morel J M.A non-local algorithm for image denoising[C]//IEEE CVPR,San Diego,California,IEEE Press,2005:60-65.
  • 5Kervrann C,Boulanger J.Optimal spatial adaptation for patch-based image denoising[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2006,15(10):2866-2878.
  • 6CoupéP,Yger P,Prima S,et al.An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for3-D magnetic resonance images[J].IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,2008,27(4):425-441.
  • 7Avanaki A N,Diyanat A,Sodagari S.Optimum parameter estimation for non-local means image de-noising using corner information[C]//The 9 th International Conference on Signal Processing,Beijing,China,IEEE Press,2008:861-863.
  • 8Zimmer S,Didas S,Weickert J.A rotationally invariant block matching strategy improving image denoising with non-local means[C]//Interna-tional Workshop on Local and Non-Local Approximation in Image Pro-cessing,Lausanne,Switzerland,2008.
  • 9Smith S M,Brady J M.SUSAN-A new approach to low level image pro-cessing[J].International Journal of Computer Vision,1997,23(1):45-78.
  • 10Zhang Y K,Zhang Y J,Lu H B.Statistical sinogram smoothing for low-dose CT with segmentation-based adaptive filtering[J].IEEE Transac-tions on Nuclear Science,2010,57(5):2587-2598.

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部