期刊文献+

高特质愤怒个体对负性情绪面孔注意偏向的实验研究 被引量:19

An Experimental Study of Attentional Bias to Negative Emotion Facial Expressions in High Trait Anger Individuals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨高特质愤怒个体是否对负性情绪面孔有注意偏向。方法采用点探测任务,比较高低特质愤怒个体(高特质愤怒组24人,低特质愤怒组24人)对不同性质情绪面孔同异侧探测符号反应时的差异。结果重复测量方差分析发现存在面孔性质边缘主效应(F=2.426,p=.073)及组别与面孔性质的交互效应,探测位置主效应(F=5.089,p=.029)及组别与探测位置的交互效应,组别、面孔性质与探测位置的交互效应。进一步分析发现,高特质愤怒组对愤怒面孔同侧探测刺激反应时显著快于异侧反应时[(386.12±50.09)ms VS.(403.33±59.39)ms,F=17.050,p=.000],快乐面孔同侧探测刺激反应时显著慢于异侧反应时[(396.88±53.87)ms VS.(380.78±41.06)ms,F=18.200,p=.000)],低特质愤怒组被试不同性质面孔同异侧反应时无显著差异。结论高特质愤怒个体对与愤怒相关刺激存在注意偏向。 Trait anger is a general tendency to react angrily to perceive situations,and it is individual differences in anger proneness such as the tendency to perceive a wide range of situations as annoying or frustrating,and the disposition to respond to such situations with elevations in state anger.Many studies focused on high trait anger individuals' attentional bias,but previous studies had no unanimous conclusion about whether high trait anger participants have attentional bias to negative stimulus,so this study aims to investigate whether there is attentional bias to negative emotion facial expressions in high trait anger individuals.A visual dot probe task was used in this study,and the stimuli were real facial expressions including anger,fear,sadness,neutral and happy faces.A 2(high trait anger / low trait anger) × 5(happy / neutral / angry / sad / fear) × 2(identical side / opposite side) mixed design was adopted to compare the reaction time deviations to different emotion facial expressions with a detecting probe at different sides in the high trait anger participants and the low trait anger participants(high trait anger: n=24,low trait anger: n=24)in the condition of stimuli presentation time 500ms.E-Prime program was used to present the stimulus and to record the reaction time and accuracy to stimuli of all subjects in the visual dot probe task.SPSS was used and Repeated Measurement ANOVA was made.Both the main effect of each variable and the interaction effect of variables were tested.It was shown by Repeated Measurement ANOVA that the marginal main effect(F=2.462,p=.073)in facial expressions properties and the interaction effect(F=3.323,p=.025) between groups and facial expressions properties were found,that the main effect in detecting locations(F=5.089,p=.029)and the interaction effect(F=12.736,p=.001) between groups and detecting locations were found,that the interaction effect(F=4.905,p=.001) among groups,facial expressions properties and detecting locations was found.Further analysis showed the reaction time to detect stimuli of angry facial expression under the identical side was shorter than under the opposite side in the high trait anger group[(386.12±50.09)ms VS.(403.33±59.39)ms,F=17.050,p=.000,and it also showed that the reaction time to detect stimulu of happy facial expression under the identical side was longer than under the opposite side in the high trait anger group[(396.88±53.87)ms VS.(380.78±41.06)ms,F=18.200,p=.000],and the deviation of reaction time to other facial expressions was not significant.In the low trait anger group,there not any significant deviation of reaction time under the identical side or the opposite side to any emotion facial expressions.The reaction time of high trait anger participants to facial expression of anger was significantly shorter than the facial expressions of fear,sadness,neutrality and happiness while the detecting stimulus was at the identical side.Attentional bias to facial expression of anger was shown.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期322-327,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 特质愤怒 注意偏向 点探测 Trait anger Attentional bias Dot probe task
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1王妍,罗跃嘉.大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(4):396-398. 被引量:185
  • 2Algom, D., Chaujut, E., &Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 133, 323 - 338.
  • 3Barazzone, N. , & Davey, G. C. L. (2009). Anger potentiates the reporting of threatening interpretations: an experimental study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(4) ,489 - 495.
  • 4Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, eonquences, and control. New York : McGraw - Hill, 134.
  • 5Bertsch, K., B6hnke, R. , Kruk, M. R., &Naumann, E. (2009). Influence of aggression on information processing in the emotional stroop task an event - related potential study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience ,3(28), 1 - 10.
  • 6Carretie, L. ,Mercado, F.,Hinojosa, J. A., Martin-Loeches, M., &Sotillo, M. (2004). Vtdence- related vigilance biases in anxiety studied through event related potentials. Journal of Affective DiuJrders, 78,119 - 130.
  • 7Chen, CY., Juan, CH., Muggleton, NG, Tzeng, OJL., & Hung, DL. (2007). Impulsive- and premeditated- violent offenders display different pattern.s of attentional disengagement from negative facial expressions. Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting, New York. Retrieved June 2, 2009, from http: // issue, ym. edu. tw/cia/ new/files/ Dr-attend/ 2007/ Q2/ 2007Q207/07 paper, pdf.
  • 8Cohen, D.J., Eckhardt, C. I., & Schagat, K. D . (1998). Attention allocation and habituation to anger- related stimuli during a visual search task. Aggressive Behavior, 24,399 - 409.
  • 9Eckhardt, C. I., & Cohen, D. J . (1997). Attention to anger - relevant and irrelevant stimuli following naturalistic insult. Personality and hutividual DiVerences, 23,619-629.
  • 10Gianeola, P. (2002). The influence of trait anger on the alcohol -aggression relation in men and women. Alcoholism: Clinical and E:t'perimental Research, 26,1350 - 1358.

二级参考文献19

  • 1王妍,罗跃嘉.面孔表情的ERP研究进展[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(4):428-431. 被引量:16
  • 2Boucher JD, Carlson GE.Recognition of facial expression in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,1980,11:263-280.
  • 3McAndrew FT. A cross-cultural study of recognition thresholds for facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1986,17:211-224.
  • 4Wang L, Markham R. The development of a series of photographs of Chinese facial expressions of emotion,Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1999,30(4):397-410.
  • 5Gosselin P, Kirouac G, Dore F.Components and recognition of facial expression in the communication of emotion by actors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1995,68:83-96.
  • 6Ekman P, Friesen WV, O'Sullivan M,et al. Universals and cultural differences in the judgements of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1987,53:712-717.
  • 7Adolphs R. Recognizing emotion from facial expressions:psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews, 2002,1:21-61.
  • 8Pizzagalli D, Koenig T, Regard M, Lehmann D. Faces and emotions: brain electric field sources during covert emotional processing. Neuropsychologia, 1998,36(4):323-332.
  • 9Pizzagalli DA, Lehmann D, Hendfick AM, et al. Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (approximately 160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. Neuroimage, 2002,16(3 Pt 1):663-77.
  • 10Townshend JM,Duka T. Mixed emotions: alcoholics' impairments in the recognition of specific emotional facial expressions. Neuropsychologia, 2003,41(7):773-82.

共引文献184

同被引文献346

引证文献19

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部