期刊文献+

长程脑电图联合脑干听觉诱发电位在早期预测中重度脑功能损害患者预后中的应用研究 被引量:4

THE STUDY APPLIED ON L-EEG UNITED BAEP IN EARLY PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH MODERATE OR SEVERE BRAIN IMPAIRMENT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对急性脑功能损害患者进行长程脑电图(Long-term electroencephalogram,L-EEG和脑干听觉透发电位(brainstem auditory evoked potential,BAEP)检查,以探讨其早期预测预后的临床价值。方法:对明确临床诊断的40例急性脑功能损害患者进行L-EEG和BAEP监测,并按Synek和Hall标准进行分级,采用格拉斯哥预后分级(Glasgow outcome scale,GOS)进行临床预后评估,综合分析比较L-EEG联合BAEP与GCS早期预测脑功能损害患者预后的准确性。结果:GCS早期预测中重度脑功能损害患者预后的敏感性、特异性和综合预测准确率分别为76.9%、64.3%和72.5%,L-EEG联合BAEP敏感性、特异性和综合预测准确率分别为92.3%、85.7%和90.0%,经统计学处理,有显著性差异(P值均<0.05)。结论:L-EEG联合BAEP检查对中重症脑功能损害患者预后的早期判断有着重要价值。 Objective:To study the clinical value of early prediction in patients with moderate or severe brain impairment Long-term electroencephalogram (L-EEG)and brain-stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP).Methods:L-EEG and BAEP were monitored in 40 patients with brain impairment diagnosed clinically.The patients were graded by Synek in EEG and Hall in BAEP.Using Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS)assessed clinical outcomes.The research findings were analyzed comprehensively and compared the accuracy of L-EEG united BAEP with GCS in early prediction of the prognosis of patients with brain impairment.Results:The sensitivity,specificity and comprehensive prediction accuracy rates were 76.9%,64.3% and 72.5% on GOS,and same time which were 92.3%,85.7% and 90.0% on L-EEG united BAEP in the brain impairment patients.There were significant difference between GOS and L-EEG with BAEP (P0.05).Conclusion:The examination of L-EEG and BAEP was of important valuable in early prediction of prognosis of patients with moderate or severe brain impairment.
出处 《现代电生理学杂志》 2011年第1期3-7,共5页 Journal of Modern Electrophysiology
关键词 急性脑功能损害 脑电图 脑干听觉诱发电位 评估预后 acute cerebral impairment electroencephalogram brain-stem auditory evoked potential prediction of prognosis.
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献26

  • 1王今达,王宝恩.多脏器功能失常综合征(MODS)病情分期诊断及严重程度评分标准(经庐山’95全国危重病急救医学学术会讨论通过)[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):346-347. 被引量:1413
  • 2黄华品,车春晖,郑安,庄晓芸,江芳,刘楠.动态脑电图对皮层或脑干病变昏迷病人预后的评估价值[J].福建医科大学学报,2005,39(3):342-344. 被引量:17
  • 3[2]Young GB,Mclachlam RS,Kreeft JH.An electron encephalographic classification for coma[J].Can J Neurol Sci,1997,24(4):320 ~ 325
  • 4[5]Chen R,Bolton CF,Young B.Prediction of outcome in patients with anoxic coma:a clinical and electrophysiologic study[J].Crit Care Med,1996,24(4):672 ~ 678
  • 5[6]Hockaday JM.EEG changes in acute cerebral anoxia from cardiac or respiratory arrest[J].Electroenceph Clin Neurophysi,1965,18:575
  • 6[7]Newlon PG,Greenberg RP,Enas GG,et al.Effects of therapeutic pentobarbital coma on multimodality evoked potentials recorded from severely head injured patients[J].Neurosurgery,1983,12:613 ~ 619
  • 7[8]Logi F,Fischer C,Murri L,et al.The prognostic value of evoked responses from primary somatosensory and auditory cortex in comatose patients[J].Clin Neurophysiol,2003,114:1615 ~ 1627
  • 8[9]Ogura M,Naka,D,Ozaki F.Extradural spinal cord stimulation therapy for prolonged coma after head trauma[J].The society for Treatment of Coma,1995,4:179 ~ 185
  • 9[11]Pohlmann-Eden B,Dingethal K,Bender HJ,Koelfen W.How reliable is the predictive value of SEP patterns in severe brain damage with special regard to the bilateral loss of cortial responses?[J].Intensine Care Med,1997,23(3):301 ~ 8
  • 10Hockaday JM. EEG changes in acute cerebral anoxia from cardiac or respiratory arrest[J]. Electroenceph. alogr Clin Neurophysio. 1965,18:575.

共引文献64

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部