摘要
目的:评估认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ)中文版在抑郁性障碍患者中的信度、效度。方法:299例抑郁性障碍患者完成认知情绪调节问卷和流调中心用抑郁自评量表。结果:CERQ全量表的α系数为0.858,9个分量表的α系数在0.622~0.869之间;全量表条目间平均相关系数为0.144,9个分量表的条目间平均相关系数在0.291~0.623之间;全量表的分半信度系数为0.747,9个分量表的分半信度系数为0.613~0.856。验证性因子分析结果显示TLI为0.890,CFI为0.904,IFI为0.905,RMSEA为0.053。依据CES-D得分将被试分为抑郁低分组、抑郁高分组,两组患者在CERQ自我责备、沉思、积极重新评价、理性分析和灾难化等因子上的得分差异显著(P<0.05)。结论:CERQ的信度与效度达到了心理测量学要求,可用于测查抑郁性障碍患者的认知情绪调节方式。
Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in depressive patients.Methods: 299 depressive patients were tested with the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.Results: The alpha coefficient for CERQ-C was 0.858,the alpha coefficient for nine factors ranged from 0.622 to 0.869;the mean inter-item correlation coefficient for CERQ-C was 0.144;the mean inter-item correlation coefficient for nine factors ranged from 0.291 to 0.623,the split-half reliability coefficient for CERQ-C was 0.747;the split-half reliability coefficient for nine factors ranged from 0.613 to 0.856.And the result of confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the nine-factor structure of the CERQ-C was suitable for the depressive patients.The scores of CERQ-C are significantly different in two samples on self-blame,rumination,positive refocus,putting into perspective and catastrophizing.Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the CERQ-C are satisfactory when applied to depressive patients.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
2011年第2期189-191,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
十一五国家科级支撑计划(2007BAI17B05)
关键词
抑郁
认知策略
情绪调节
信度
效度
Depression
Cognitive strategies
Emotion regulation
Reliability
Validity