期刊文献+

水牛徒手克隆的初步研究 被引量:3

Study on the Hand-made Cloning (HMC) in Buffalo
下载PDF
导出
摘要 徒手克隆是近年发展起来的一种手工化的核移植技术。本试验探讨了不同的去核方法、融合方法和供体细胞类型对水牛HMC效率的影响。试验结果表明,CB处理法去核与荧光染色法去核相比,去核效率及之后的重组胚发育能力均无显著差异(P>0.05);一步法的融合率极显著高于两步法(P<0.01),而两种方法构建的重组胚发育能力则无显著差异(P>0.05);利用卵丘细胞所构建的HMC胚胎的融合率极显著高于耳皮肤成纤维细胞(P<0.01),但重组胚的发育效果差异不显著(P>0.05)。说明利用卵丘细胞作为HMC的供体细胞,采用CB处理法去核和一步融合的方法进行徒手克隆,其生产核移植胚胎效果较好。 The hand-made cloning(HMC) technique describes a simplified nuclear transfer process without the need for micromanipulators.This study was conducted to investigate the effect of different enucleation,fusion methods and donor cell types on the efficiency of HMC in buffalo.The results indicated that chemically assisted enucleation with cytochalasin b(CB) showed similar enucleation efficiency to Hoechst 33342 staining enucleation;the fusion rate of one-step method was significantly higher than two-steps method(P0.01),while the developmental abilities of the couplets reconstructed by the two methods were no significant different from each other(P0.05).The fusion rate of HMC couplets derived from ear fibroblasts was significantly lower than that of couplets from cumulus cells(P0.01),while the cleavage and blastocyst rates of the embryos from the two cell types were not different from each other(P0.05).The study showed that CB assisted enucleation,one-step fusion,cumulus cells can be adopted for HMC in buffalo to improve the efficiency of cloning.
出处 《中国畜牧兽医》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第4期147-150,共4页 China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine
基金 农业部948项目(2006-G49) 广西科技厅基础科研业务费项目(水牛基0830005)
关键词 水牛 HMC 去核 融合 供体细胞 buffalo HMC enucleation fusion donor cells
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Li J,,Du Y,Zhang Y H,et al.Chemically assisted handmade enu-cleation of porcine oocytes. Cloning and Stem Cells . 2006
  • 2Shi D,Lu F,Wei Y,et al.Buffalos (Bubalus bubalis)cloned bynuclear transfer of somatic cells. Biology of Reproduction . 2007
  • 3Srirattana K,,Lorthongpanich C,Laowtammathron C,et al.Effect of donor cell types on developmental potential of cattle(Bos taurus)and Swamp buffalo(Bubalus bubalis)cloned em-bryos. Journal of Reproduction and Development . 2010
  • 4Yang C Y,Li R C,Pang C Y,et al.Study on the inter-subspe-cies nuclear transfer of river buffalo somatic cell nuclei intoswamp buffalo oocyte cytoplasm. Animal Reproduction Science . 2010
  • 5Tecirlioglu RT,Cooney MA,Lewis IM, et al.Comparison of two approaches to nuclear transfer in the bovine: hand-made cloning with modifications and the conventional nuclear transfer technique. Reproduction Fertility and Development . 2005
  • 6Shah R.A,George A,Singh M.K,Kumar D,Chauhan M.S,Manik R,Palta P,Singla S.K.Hand-madecloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)embryos:comparison ofdifferent media and culture systems. Cloning and Stem Cell . 2008
  • 7SHAH R A,GEORGE A,SINGH M K,et al.Pregnancies established from handmade cloned blasto-cysts reconstructed using skin fibroblasts in buffalo(Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology . 2009
  • 8Vajta G et al.Highly efficient and reliable chemically assistedenucleation method for handmade cloning in cattle. ReprodFertil . 2005
  • 9Peura T T,Lewis I M,Trounson A O.The effect of recipient oocyte volume on nuclear transfer in cattle. Molecular Reproduction and Development . 1998
  • 10Vajta G,Lewis I M,Hyttel P,et al.Somatic cell cloning without micromanipulators. Cloning . 2001

同被引文献13

  • 1Ali J, Shelton J N. Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos. J Reprod Fertil, 1993,99 : 471-477.
  • 2Lagutina l, Lazzari G, Duchi R, et al. Comparative aspects of somatic cell nuclear transfer with conventional and zona-free method in cattle, horse, pig and sheep. Theriogenology, 2007, 67 : 90-98.
  • 3Saikhun J, Kitiyanant N, Songtaveesin C, et al. Development of swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos after parthenogenetic activation and nuclear transfer using serum fed or starved fetal fibroblasts. Repord Nutr Dev,2004,44: 65-78.
  • 4Shah R A, George A, Singh M K, et al. Hand-made cloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos: comparison of different media and culture systems. Cloning Stem Cells, 2008,10:435 -442.
  • 5Vajta G, Hyttel P, Callensen H. Morphological changes of in vitro produced bovine hlastocysts after vitrification, in-straw direct rehydration, and culture. Mol Reprod Dev, 1997,48: 9- 17.
  • 6Vajta G, Peura T T, Holm P, et al. New method for culture of zona-ineluded or zona-free embryos: the well of the well (WOW) system. Mol Reprod,2000,55: 256-264.
  • 7Vajta G, Lewis I M, Hyttel P, et al. Somatic cell cloning without micromanipulators. Cloning,2001,3 : 89-95.
  • 8Vajta G, Lewis 1 M, Trounson A O, et al. Handmade somatic cell cloning in cattle., analysis of factors contributing to high efficiency in vitro. Biol Reprod,2003,68 : 571- 578.
  • 9Vajta G, Kragh P M, Mtango N R. Handmade cloning approach: potentials and limitations. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2005,17 97-112.
  • 10Westhusin M, Collas P, Marek D, et al. Reducing the amount of cytoplasm available for early embryonic development decreases the quality but not quantity of embryos produced by in vitro fertilisation and nuclear transplantation. Theriogenology, 1996,46 : 243-252.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部