摘要
目的探讨灾难救助者替代性创伤与特质应对方式及社会支持的关系。方法采用替代性创伤问卷、特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)与社会支持评定量表(SSRS)对91名灾难救助者进行调查。结果①不同性别救助者在替代性创伤上行为反应这一维度得分存在显著差(t=-2.335,P<0.05);②灾难救助者消极应对分量表得分,除了认知反应这一维度外,与替代性创伤各维度呈显著正相关(r=0.381,P<0.05);积极应对分量表得分除认知反应和生活信念外,与替代性创伤各维度呈显著负相关(r=-0.286,P<0.01);③社会支持总分与情绪反应呈显著负相关(r=-0.252)。结论倾向于采用积极应对方式的灾难救助者,其创伤程度较低;而倾向于采用消极应对方式的灾难救助者,其创伤程度较高;灾难救助者得到的社会支持越多,则其情绪反应越少。
Objective To explore the relationship between vicarious traumatization coping and social support.Methods A total of 91 trauma helpers were tested by vicarious traumatization questionnaire,TCSQ and SSRS.Results ①There were significant differences in sex on behavioral response;there were no significant differences on vicarious traumatization questionnaire in culture degree,professions and income.②Negative coping style were positively related to vicarious traumatization(r=0.381,P0.05),positive coping style were negatively related to vicarious traumatization(r=-0.286,P0.01).③Social support were negatively related to emotional response(r=-0.252).Conclusion The one who was attended to use positive coping style had less vicarious traumatization.The one who tended to use negative coping style had more vicarious traumatization.The trauma helpers who had more social support had less emotional response.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2011年第4期412-413,共2页
China Journal of Health Psychology
基金
唐山市科学技术研究与发展计划课题(08130230C)
关键词
灾难救助者
替代性创伤
特质应对方式
社会支持
Trauma helpers
Vicarious traumatization
Trait coping styles
Social support