消解叙述的读者叙事判断

Narrative Judgment of Denarration

消解叙述是近来叙事学理论的重要概念，然而目前的研究忽视了从读者接受角度探讨其文学意义。本文借鉴詹姆斯·费伦的修辞性叙事理论对小说《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》中的消解叙述策略进行探究，在分析文内受述者叙事判断的基础上考察小说叙事进程与读者叙事判断之间的互动。分析表明，消解叙述由明显或隐含的伦理立场所支撑，叙述者及文内受述者的伦理判断将左右读者的阐释判断。同时，本文认为消解叙述具有多种形态，关于其是否具有颠覆或解构故事事实与叙述话语之区分的作用，应结合具体作品探讨。

Denarration, though emerged as an important concept in recent narrative studies,has yet received little investigation on its literary significance from the perspective of audience response. By adopting James Phelan＇s rhetorical approach to narrative,this paper studies the technique of denarration used in the novel of Life o.fPi,and discusses the interaction between narrative progression and audience judgment based on a close reading of the judgment made by the narratees within the fiction. The a- nalysis reveals that denarration is underpinned by explicit or im- plicit ethical positions and that the audience＇s interpretive judgment is influenced by their ethical judgment of the narrators and narratees. While there are varieties of denarration, its effect on story-discourse distinction should be explored within the specific context of an individual narrative.