期刊文献+

认知语法和构式语法在论元结构问题上的互补性 被引量:21

On the Complementarity of Cognitive Grammar and Construction Grammar on Argument Structure Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 论元结构是理论语言学的一个核心问题,也是认知语法和构式语法关注的焦点。认知语法强调语义的百科性,借助包含独立理据的认知手段对语义基础进行识解,在构式的理据性以及构式和动词的融合上能为构式语法提供补充。构式语法强调自上而下的思路处理论元结构,促使认知语法更加重视构式的意义表征。两种理论框架关注的焦点虽然有所不同,但具有内在统一性,可以互相补充,提高对于论元结构问题的解释力。 As a key issue in theoretical linguistics, argument structure attracts a great deal of attention from Cognitive Grammar and Construction Grammar. Cognitive Grammar, which emphasizes the encyclopedic nature of meaning, construes the semantic base by means of independently motivated cognitive methods. It can provide important insights for the study of constructional motivations as well as the fusion between the verb and the construction in Construction Grammar. Construction Grammar, on the other hand, stresses the top-down approach in the study of argument structure, and calls for Cognitive Grammar to attach more significance to the representation of constructional meaning. These two theoretical frameworks, despite their different focuses, can be unified and become mutually complementary. In this way, they can achieve more explanatory power for argument structure.
作者 张翼
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期44-49,共6页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 论元结构 认知语法 构式语法 argument structure Cognitive Grammar Construction Grammar
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1赵彦春.语义合成原则的有效性——对Taylor(2002)证伪的证伪[J].外国语,2008,31(3):20-30. 被引量:9
  • 2Langacker,R.Cognitive Grammar:A BasicIntroduction. . 2008
  • 3Zhang,R.Enriched Composition and Inference inthe Argument Structure of Chinese. . 2005
  • 4Langacker,R.Cognitive(Construction)Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics . 2009
  • 5Broccias,C.Towards a history of Englishresultative constructions:the case of adjectivalresultative constructions. English Languageand Linguistics . 2008
  • 6Boas,H.Resolving form-meaning discrepanciesin Construction Grammar. Constructional Reorganization . 2008
  • 7Boas,H.Determining the structure of lexicalentries and grammatical constructions inConstruction Grammar. Annual Review ofCognitive Linguistics . 2008
  • 8Langacker,R.Cognitive Grammar. The OxfordHandbook ofCognitive Linguistics . 2009
  • 9Rappaport Hovav,M,B.Levin.Morphologyand Lexical Semantics. Handbook ofMorphology . 1998
  • 10Croft,W.Construction Grammar. The Oxford Handbook ofCognitive Linguistics . 2009

二级参考文献14

  • 1Croft,W.& D.A.Cruse.Cognitive Linguistics[M].Cambridge University Press,2004.105;105-254.
  • 2Lakoff,G.,and Johnson,M.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980.
  • 3Sweetser,E.Compositionality and blending:semantic composition in a cognitive realistic framework[M].In Janssen and Redeker (eds.) 1999.129-62.132-3.
  • 4Taylor,J.R..Cognitive Grammar[M].Oxford University Press.2002.97-120;9;99;106;98-99;106.
  • 5Taylor,J.R.Models of meaning in Comparison:The Two-level Model (Manfred Bierwisch) and the Network Model (Ronald Langacker)[A].Rene Dirven,and Johan Nanparys.Current Appraoches to the Lexicon[M].pp-26.Frankfurt a.M.:Langman.5,1995.
  • 6Langacker,R.W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar.Vol.I.Theoretical Prerequisites[M].Standford,Cal.:Stanford University Press,1987.76;76.
  • 7Russell,B.Human Knowledge:Its Scope and Limits[M].London:George Allen and Unwen,1948.163.
  • 8Aristotle.Metaphysics[M].Tr.H.Tredennick=Works XVII-XVIII.1980.10-11.
  • 9Leach,E.Anthropological aspect of language:Animal categories and verbal abuse[A].E,H.Lenneberg.New Directions in the Study of Language[M].Cambridge,Mass.:MIT Press 1964,34;23-63.
  • 10Taylor,J.R..Linguistic Categorization:Prototypes in Linguistic Theory[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1989.2-3.

共引文献8

同被引文献419

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部