期刊文献+

现代汉语量词的评价意义分析 被引量:16

The Evaluation of the Measure Words in Mandarin Chinese
原文传递
导出
摘要 语言评价系统是系统功能语言学框架中的一个意义实现的资源系统,即语言使用者为了准确传递交际情感以及和交际对象成功实现情感协商而有意识或潜意识选择评价资源。评价资源分为外显性和内隐性两种。外显性评价手段主要集中于对词汇语法的选择来表现语言使用者的人际意义,内隐性评价手段则主要是通过对文本整体基调以及文本之外的因素来传递语言使用者的人际意义倾向。外显性研究主要集中在形容词、副词、动词等实词上。由于这一理论是建立在英语语言基础之上,所以对一些英语语言体系中不常见的词的评价较少,量词就是这样的一个词类。本文试图在CCL语料库基础上,用评价理论从外显性评价手段来分析汉语中量词的评价意义,研究发现:(1)量词具有评价意义;(2)量词的评价意义集中在态度系统和级差系统;(3)量词的评价意义分为独立评价意义和伴随性强化评价意义;(4)各种评价意义存在着相互叠加的现象。 The language evaluation system developed by Martin et al.is one of the subsystems of SFL.It aims at figuring out the users' attitude of inter-subjective by the language they adopt.The language evaluation system is widely used in many languages,including Mandarin Chinese.Yet most of the researches are carried out on the lexical layers the same as those in English.Our finding is that such a system can also be applied in the lexis which is lack in English such as measure words.The present paper tires to analyze the language evaluation of the Mandarin measure words.We found:(1) the Chinese measure words possess the function of evaluation;(2) their evaluation functions exist mainly in the systems of attitude and graduation;(3) they can evaluate the attitude in way of independent style and aggrandizement style;(4) the measure words can realize more than one evaluative meaning at the same time.
作者 刘悦明
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期62-67,共6页 Foreign Language Research
关键词 评价理论 量词 评价意义 appraisal theory measure words evaluation meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献24

  • 1张美兰.论《五灯会元》中同形动量词[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),1996(1):109-113. 被引量:24
  • 2王振华.评价系统及其运作——系统功能语言学的新发展[J].外国语,2001,24(6):13-20. 被引量:1037
  • 3Martin,J.R.English Text[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1992.
  • 4Martin,J.R.Interpersonal meaning,persuasion,and public discourse:Packing semiotic punch[J].Australian Journal of Linguistics,1995a(15):3-67.
  • 5Martin,J.R.Reading Positions/Positioning Readers:Judgement in English[J].Prospect:A Journal of Australian TESOL,1995b,10(2):27-37.
  • 6Martin,J.R.Beyond exchange:Appraisal systems in English,in evaluation in text[A].Hunston,S.& Thampsan,G.(eds).Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000.
  • 7Martin,J.R.Tenderness:realisation and individuation in a Botswanan town[A].In N.Knight & A.Mahboob (ed.).Questioning Linguistics[C].Cambridge:Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2008:27-54.
  • 8Poynton,C.Language and Gender:Making the Difference[M].Geelong,Victoria:Deakin University Press,1985.
  • 9Rothery,J.& Stenglin,M.interpreting literature:The role of appraisal[A].In Unsworth,L.(ed.).Researching Language in Schools and Functional Linguistic Perspectives[C].London:Cassell,2000.
  • 10White,P.R.R.Dialogue and inter-subjectivity:Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging[A].In Coulthard,M.,Cotterill,J.,& Rock,F.(eds).Working With Dialog[C].Neimeyer,2000.

共引文献1174

同被引文献233

引证文献16

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部